Effects of Inhaled Cannabis on Driving Performance
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to expand understanding of the effects of cannabis on driving performance with and without the presence of low levels of alcohol. This project will involve the development a of a protocol and driving environment that is sensitive to the effects of cannabis on driving performance by building on prior driving situations used previously for testing the effects of alcohol on driving.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 1, 2017
CompletedMay 2, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.7 years
June 4, 2012
April 17, 2017
April 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Driving Performance
Measured by standard deviation of lane position. Metrics of driving performance were modeled using the SAS GLM Select function to identify changes in driver performance. Numbers represents coefficients on the regression equation such that this increase would be expected for every unit increase. A unit for THC is 1 ng/ml and a unit for BAC is 0.01% BAC. In understanding the regression coefficients, for THC the units for the coefficient would be expressed as cm per (ng/ml of THC), and for BrAC the units for the coefficient would be expressed as cm per (0.01% BrAC). The overall regression equation would be represented as SDLP = Intercept + Cthc x THC + Cbrac x BrAC. The coefficients indicate the strength of the effect on driving performance with higher coefficients indicating larger effects relative to the concentrations. Coefficients of zero indicate no effect or interactive effect.
Through entire drive, 0.5-1.3 hr post cannabis administration.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
THC Concentration in Plasma Sample
-0.7 hr, 0.25hr, 1.1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, 4.5 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr post cannabis administration
THC Concentration Levels in Whole Blood
-0.7 hr, 0.25hr, 1.1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, 4.5 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr post cannabis
Study Arms (6)
0% THC with 0.065 g/dL BAC
EXPERIMENTAL2.5-3.5% THC with 0.065 g/dL BAC
EXPERIMENTAL6.0-7.5% THC and 0.065 g/dL BAC
EXPERIMENTAL2.5-3.5% THC with 0 g/dL BAC
EXPERIMENTAL6.0-7.5% THC with 0 g/dL BAC
EXPERIMENTAL0% THC with 0 g/dL BAC
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Subjects will be dosed to an approximate peak BAC of 0.065%. Subjects will be tested on the decline such that subjects will be at or above the goal BAC (0.05%) throughout the drive
Cannabis vapor is produced from 500 mg either placebo (0% THC), approximately 2.5-3.5% THC (low dose), or approximately 6.0-7.5% THC (high dose) bulk cannabis plant material to yield doses of approximately 0, 12.5-17.5, or 30-37.5 mg THC
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy adult (age 21-55) men and women, based on medical and psychological evaluation
- Currently valid unrestricted (except for vision correction) US driver's license
- Licensed driver for at least the past two years
- Drove at least 1300 miles in the past year, by self-report
- Live within an 80 mile radius of NADS
- Available for an overnight stay followed by a full-day study session for six sessions
- Must be considered a light or moderate drinker according to Quantity-Frequency-Variability Scale (QFV)
- Cannabis use with a minimum frequency averaging at least one day per quarter and no more than three days a week during the three months prior to study entry
- Peripheral veins suitable for repeated venipuncture and/or placement of an intravenous catheter
- Systolic blood pressure within a clinically normal range (120 ± 30 mmHg) and -diastolic blood pressure of 80 ± 20 mmHg..
- Good command of written and spoken English
- Female subjects with reproductive potential must agree to use (and/or have their partner use) one (1) acceptable method of birth control beginning at the screening visit throughout the study (including intervals between treatment periods/panels) and until 2 weeks after the last dose of study drug in the last treatment period. Acceptable methods of birth control include the following: intrauterine device (IUD-with or without local hormone release), diaphragm, spermicides, cervical cap, contraceptive sponge, oral contraceptives or condoms. Abstinence is an alternative lifestyle and subjects practicing abstinence may be included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of any clinically significant illness, as detected by history, physical examination, and/or laboratory tests, that might influence driving performance (e.g., seizures, sleep apnea, narcolepsy, vertigo, chronic fatigue syndrome) or put the subject at increased risk of adverse events (e.g., cardiac arrhythmia, hypertension)
- History of a clinically significant adverse event associated with cannabis or alcohol intoxication
- Donation of more than 450 mL of blood within 14 days of study drug administration
- If female, pregnant or nursing
- Currently interested in or participating in drug abuse treatment, or participated in drug abuse treatment within 60 days preceding study enrollment
- Currently taking drugs that are contraindicated for use with study drugs
- Requires any special equipment to aid in driving (ex. pedal extensions, hand brake or throttle, spinner wheel knobs or other non-standard equipment)
- Significant history of motion sickness or demonstrates significant simulator sickness during practice drives at screening (SSQ). Subjects must have scores below the following values on the SSQ: Nausea \< 21, Oculomotor \<32, Disorientation \< 15, and Total Score \< 32.
- Current alcohol or cannabis use disorder, as identified by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test for alcohol or Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test for cannabis.
- History of any illness that, in the opinion of the study investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose an additional risk to the subject from study participation
- Prior participation in a driver impairment or distraction-related research study conducted at NADS that uses the same base drive.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gary R Gaffneylead
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)collaborator
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
National Advanced Driving Simulator
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Related Publications (4)
Hartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Pierce RS, Gorelick DA, Gaffney G, Huestis MA. Cannabis effects on driving lateral control with and without alcohol. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Sep 1;154:25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
PMID: 26144593RESULTHartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Gorelick DA, Gaffney G, Huestis MA. Controlled Cannabis Vaporizer Administration: Blood and Plasma Cannabinoids with and without Alcohol. Clin Chem. 2015 Jun;61(6):850-69. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.238287. Epub 2015 May 27.
PMID: 26019183RESULTHartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Gorelick DA, Gaffney G, Huestis MA. Controlled vaporized cannabis, with and without alcohol: subjective effects and oral fluid-blood cannabinoid relationships. Drug Test Anal. 2016 Jul;8(7):690-701. doi: 10.1002/dta.1839. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
PMID: 26257143RESULTHartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Pierce RS, Gorelick DA, Gaffney G, Huestis MA. Cannabis effects on driving longitudinal control with and without alcohol. J Appl Toxicol. 2016 Nov;36(11):1418-29. doi: 10.1002/jat.3295. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
PMID: 26889769RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study examined only occasional users and the generalization to new or frequent cannabis users is unclear.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Timothy L. Brown, Co-PI
- Organization
- National Advanced Driving Simulator
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary G Gaffney, M.D.
National Advanced Driving Simulator
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, College of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2012
First Posted
June 15, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 2, 2018
Results First Posted
June 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2018-04