Study Stopped
because of difficulties for participants enrollment
Safe and Effective Sedation in Chronic Alcoholic Patients Underwent Diagnostic Endoscopic Procedures: Study Comparing Midazolam and Propofol With Midazolam
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sedative endoscopic examination using sedative premedication has been undertaken to induce conscious sedation for comfortable and painless endoscopy. Midazolam has been most widely used as a sedative premedication because it has lots of advantages, such as a short half-life, a faster onset of sedation and an excellent sedative hypnotic effect. However, midazolam has been used regardless of whether or not alcohol although using midazolam in chronic alcoholics is related to paradoxical reaction, characterized by increased talkativeness, emotional release, excitement, and excessive movement. In recent years, propofol has been used safety and effectively in sedative GI endoscopy because of its potent hypnotic effect and its ultrashort pharmacokinetic profile. Therefore, The present study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of BPS (propofol in combination with midazolam) with conventional sedation (midazolam) in chronic alcoholic patients undergoing diagnostic GI endoscopic procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 9, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2015
CompletedNovember 28, 2017
March 1, 2014
2.7 years
June 1, 2012
November 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction of endoscopists, nurses and patients
endoscopists and nurses - about 5 minutes after the end of the procedure / patients - upon meeting discharge criteria (modified Aldrete score), an expected average of 20min
about 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
completion rate of endoscopy
about 5 minutes after the end of procedure
number of participants with complications
participants will be followed during the procedure and recovery time, an expected average of 20 min
Study Arms (2)
conventional sedation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORmidazolam
BPS group
EXPERIMENTALmidazolam plus propofol
Interventions
In both study arms, patients who were 20-70 years of age received an initial intravenous bolus of 0.05mg/kg of midazolam, while patients ≥71 years of age received an initial intravenous dose of 1mg of midazolam. After 2min following this initial dose of midazolam, the conventional sedation group received additional boluses as needed of 1 to 2 mg of midazolam at the discretion of the endoscopist, to target moderate sedation. The BPS group received an initial 0.5mg/kg bolus of intravenous propofol at 2min after midazolam administration. Subsequent incremental boluses of 10 to 20 mg of propofol were allowed to be given at the discretion of the endoscopist every 30s to target moderate sedation.
In both study arms, patients who were 20-70 years of age received an initial intravenous bolus of 0.05mg/kg of midazolam, while patients ≥71 years of age received an initial intravenous dose of 1mg of midazolam. After 2min following this initial dose of midazolam, the conventional sedation group received additional boluses as needed of 1 to 2 mg of midazolam at the discretion of the endoscopist, to target moderate sedation. The BPS group received an initial 0.5mg/kg bolus of intravenous propofol at 2min after midazolam administration. Subsequent incremental boluses of 10 to 20 mg of propofol were allowed to be given at the discretion of the endoscopist every 30s to target moderate sedation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥ 20
- ECOG ≥ 2
- patient who consents to enroll the trial
You may not qualify if:
- age \< 20
- pregnant or lactating women
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status class V
- chronic pulmonary disease
- history of allergic to propofol
- history of complication of sedation endoscope
- liver failure or hepatic encephalopathy
- who didn't consented to enroll the trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Severance hospital
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2012
First Posted
June 12, 2012
Study Start
May 9, 2012
Primary Completion
January 30, 2015
Study Completion
January 30, 2015
Last Updated
November 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2014-03