NCT01613508

Brief Summary

The primary aim of the study is to compare the results of an established, successful procedure, which is total hip arthroplasty through a mini-posterior approach to a less studied - increasingly popular procedure, which is total hip replacement through the direct anterior approach utilizing the orthopedic table.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
116

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 27, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 5, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Activity monitors will be worn

    3 monitoring sensors will be worn by the subject.

    Baseline to 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Direct Anterior Approach

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

An oblique incision is made over the anterior margin of the tensor muscle. The fascia of the tensor muscle is identified and incised. The muscle is swept digitally laterally and a retractor is placed over the superior aspect of the femoral neck. The hip capsule is then incised and retracted.

Procedure: Direct Anterior Approach

Mini-Posterior Approach

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The surgical approach involved a 7 to 9.5 cm incision along the posterior aspect of the femur starting at the tip of the greater trochanter and proceeding distally. The fascia of the gluteus maximus was split, and blunt dissection revealed the underlying abductor and external rotator musculature. The external rotators an the hip capsule were incised and preserved as one layer, with an attempt being made to preserve the insertion of the quadratus femoris on the femur. The hip was dislocated posteriorly and the femoral neck was cut in accordance with the preoperative plan.

Procedure: Mini-Posterior Approach

Interventions

Direct Anterior Approach
Mini-Posterior Approach

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or Female patients between 20 and 100 with unilateral osteoarthritis (DJD) who are surgical candidates for total hip arthroplasty
  • Study participants must be able to give informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant proximal femoral deformity (post SCFE, Perthes, DDH), acetabular dysplasia (ANY CROWE), inflammatory arthritis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, prior infection of hip joint, significant leg length discrepancy (\> 4cm), osteoporosis, arthrodesis of the affected hip.
  • The presence of infections, highly communicable diseases, e.g. AIDS, active tuberculosis, venereal disease, hepatitis.
  • Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect normal gait or weight bearing.
  • Presence of previous prosthetic hip replacement device (any type).
  • Active Metastatic disease
  • Active major Psychiatric illness
  • Active Drug or alcohol abuse
  • BMI \> 40.
  • Patients that are known to be pregnant
  • Actively failing contralateral hip replacement.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Michael Taunton, MD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PI

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2012

First Posted

June 7, 2012

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 31, 2017

Study Completion

February 27, 2018

Last Updated

December 5, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-12

Locations