NCT01613222

Brief Summary

A study to test the accuracy of SpO2 sensors with various patient monitors, co-oximeters, and modules.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2012

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2012

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 19, 2012

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2013

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 5, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

June 5, 2012

Results QC Date

July 29, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 11, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS)

    The Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) calculation is used to measure accuracy of the test SpO2 device compared to reference SpO2 device. A scatterplot is created with the forehead sensor saturation on the y-axis and the measured blood saturation on the x-axis. The line of identity is drawn representing the ideal points, meaning that the forehead sensor saturation is always the same as the blood saturation. The dispersion of the actual data points around the line of identity can be measured using a statistical calculation called Arithmetic Root Mean Square (ARMS). The smaller ARMs the closer the data points lie around the line of identity, representing a more accurate sensor as accurate and appropriate. Data analysis follows ISO 80601-2-61, 2011, Annex EE and the FDA Guidance Document for Pulse Oximeters (FDA Draft Guidance, July 19, 2007).

    60 minutes

Study Arms (1)

Pulse oximetry monitoring

EXPERIMENTAL

The U-TruSignal with different sensors is feasible for noninvasive and continuous SpO2 monitoring and meets the specified measurement accuracy when compared to a co-oximetry gold reference.

Device: Pulse oximetry

Interventions

Pulse oximetry measurement using SpO2 sensors, patient monitors, co-oximeters, and various modules.

Pulse oximetry monitoring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Ability to provide written informed consent or have a legally authorized representative provide written informed consent
  • Subjects who are 18-55 years of age
  • Subjects must be willing and able to comply with study procedures
  • HbCO\<3% (for smokers only)

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject or a legally authorized representative is unable to provide written inform consent.
  • Subjects that are considered morbidly obese (defined as BMI \> 39.5),
  • Subjects with injuries, deformities or abnormalities that may prevent proper application of the device under test,
  • Smokers with COHb levels \>3% or subjects who have smoked within two (2) days. Subjects will be screened for COHb levels of \>3% with a Masimo Radical 7 (Rainbow).
  • Subjects with known respiratory conditions (uncontrolled asthma, head cold, flu, pneumonia / bronchitis, respiratory distress / respiratory or lung surgery, emphysema, COPD, lung disease),
  • Subjects with known heart or cardiovascular conditions,
  • Female subjects that are actively trying to get pregnant or are pregnant,
  • Subjects taking blood thinners or medications with aspirin or other antiplatelet medication in them (applies only to arterial draw study),
  • Subjects with Systolic blood pressure \>140mmHg,
  • Subjects with Diastolic blood pressure \>100mmHg,
  • Subjects with heart rhythms other than a normal sinus rhythm or with respiratory sinus arrhythmia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinimark

Louisville, Colorado, 80027, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Oximetry

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood Gas AnalysisBlood Chemical AnalysisClinical Chemistry TestsClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisHeart Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularRespiratory Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, Respiratory SystemInvestigative Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jeffrey Conner
Organization
GEHealthcare

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey Conner

    GEHC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2012

First Posted

June 7, 2012

Study Start

June 19, 2012

Primary Completion

February 15, 2013

Study Completion

February 15, 2013

Last Updated

February 5, 2019

Results First Posted

February 5, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations