SpO2 System Accuracy Testing With Different Sensors
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A study to test the accuracy of SpO2 sensors with various patient monitors, co-oximeters, and modules.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 19, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 5, 2019
CompletedFebruary 5, 2019
January 1, 2019
8 months
June 5, 2012
July 29, 2013
January 11, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS)
The Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) calculation is used to measure accuracy of the test SpO2 device compared to reference SpO2 device. A scatterplot is created with the forehead sensor saturation on the y-axis and the measured blood saturation on the x-axis. The line of identity is drawn representing the ideal points, meaning that the forehead sensor saturation is always the same as the blood saturation. The dispersion of the actual data points around the line of identity can be measured using a statistical calculation called Arithmetic Root Mean Square (ARMS). The smaller ARMs the closer the data points lie around the line of identity, representing a more accurate sensor as accurate and appropriate. Data analysis follows ISO 80601-2-61, 2011, Annex EE and the FDA Guidance Document for Pulse Oximeters (FDA Draft Guidance, July 19, 2007).
60 minutes
Study Arms (1)
Pulse oximetry monitoring
EXPERIMENTALThe U-TruSignal with different sensors is feasible for noninvasive and continuous SpO2 monitoring and meets the specified measurement accuracy when compared to a co-oximetry gold reference.
Interventions
Pulse oximetry measurement using SpO2 sensors, patient monitors, co-oximeters, and various modules.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ability to provide written informed consent or have a legally authorized representative provide written informed consent
- Subjects who are 18-55 years of age
- Subjects must be willing and able to comply with study procedures
- HbCO\<3% (for smokers only)
You may not qualify if:
- Subject or a legally authorized representative is unable to provide written inform consent.
- Subjects that are considered morbidly obese (defined as BMI \> 39.5),
- Subjects with injuries, deformities or abnormalities that may prevent proper application of the device under test,
- Smokers with COHb levels \>3% or subjects who have smoked within two (2) days. Subjects will be screened for COHb levels of \>3% with a Masimo Radical 7 (Rainbow).
- Subjects with known respiratory conditions (uncontrolled asthma, head cold, flu, pneumonia / bronchitis, respiratory distress / respiratory or lung surgery, emphysema, COPD, lung disease),
- Subjects with known heart or cardiovascular conditions,
- Female subjects that are actively trying to get pregnant or are pregnant,
- Subjects taking blood thinners or medications with aspirin or other antiplatelet medication in them (applies only to arterial draw study),
- Subjects with Systolic blood pressure \>140mmHg,
- Subjects with Diastolic blood pressure \>100mmHg,
- Subjects with heart rhythms other than a normal sinus rhythm or with respiratory sinus arrhythmia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GE Healthcarelead
Study Sites (1)
Clinimark
Louisville, Colorado, 80027, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jeffrey Conner
- Organization
- GEHealthcare
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jeffrey Conner
GEHC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2012
First Posted
June 7, 2012
Study Start
June 19, 2012
Primary Completion
February 15, 2013
Study Completion
February 15, 2013
Last Updated
February 5, 2019
Results First Posted
February 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01