NCT01611493

Brief Summary

A potential complicating factor affecting implants is crestal bone loss. The causes of crestal bone loss are attributed to several factors. Among those hypothesized, proof for one or another cause remains obscure. Clinical documentation suggests that implant design may be a key factor. While the evidence is inconclusive, various authors suggest that it is a result of a combination of effects including (1) limited drilling procedure and restricted second-stage surgery 2, (2) rough implant surface in crestal bone 3, (3) microthread design for implant stiffness 4, (4) loading along a conus versus a flat interface 5, and (5) the absence of a significant microgap 6. The practice of platform switching (e.g. placing a 4 mm diameter abutment on a 5 mm implant seating surface physically moves the inflammatory cell infiltrate zone away from the crestal bone). The growing body of anecdotal platform switch evidence supports this biological width hypothesis. Here the biological width refers to the height of the dento-gingival attachment apparatus around a normal tooth and is defined as the distance necessary for a healthy existence of bone and soft tissue from the most apical extent of a dental restoration. To formally test this hypothesis the current study has been designed. The Prevail implant has been made with an integrated medialized seating surface that establishes a platform switching function. This implant moves the implant/abutment interface away from the crestal bone and may therefore reduce the amount of bone loss observed in the standard (non-medialized) Osseotite implant design. The objective of this study is to evaluate crestal bone levels adjacent to the implant reference point from the time of implant placement to a period of two years after loading.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2011

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2011

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 31, 2012

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 5, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2012

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 5, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

May 31, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 1, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Dental ImplantsJaw, Edentulous, Partially/rehabilitationJaw, Edentulous, Partially/surgeryrandomised Clinical TrialsHumans

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Preservation of crestal bone

    Two years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Osseus integration

    Two years

Study Arms (2)

Osseotite Prevail Implant

EXPERIMENTAL

The Osseotite Prevail will be placed in sites with native bone, with at least three months of healing since tooth extraction or four months from bone augmentation grafting procedure.

Device: Osseotite Prevail Implant

Osseotite Non Prevail Implant

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Osseotite Non Prevail Implant will be placed in sites with native bone, with at least three months of healing since tooth extraction or four months from bone augmentation grafting procedure

Device: Osseotite Non Prevail Implant

Interventions

Osseotite Prevail will be placed in sites with native bone, with at least three months of healing since tooth extraction or four months from bone augmentation grafting procedure

Osseotite Prevail Implant

Osseotite Non Prevail Implant will be placed in sites with native bone, with at least three months of healing since tooth extraction or four months from bone augmentation grafting procedure

Osseotite Non Prevail Implant

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients of either sex and any race greater than 18 years of age
  • Patients for whom a decision has already been made to use dental implants for the restoration of existing edentulism in the mandible or maxilla.
  • Patients must be physically able to tolerate conventional surgical and restorative procedures.
  • Patients must agree to be evaluated for each study visit, especially the yearly follow-up visits.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with active infection or severe inflammation in the areas intended for implant placement.
  • Patients with a \> 10 cigarette per day smoking habit.
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
  • Patients with uncontrolled metabolic bone disease where there is a diagnosis of the following: Osteomalacia, primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism, renal osteodystrophy, or Paget's disease of bone.
  • Patients with a history of therapeutic radiation to the head
  • Patients in need of bone grafting at the site of the intended study implant for augmentation purposes.
  • Patients who are known to be pregnant at the screening visit.
  • Patients with evidence of severe para-functional habits such as bruxing or clenching

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CES University / Faculty of Dentistry

Medellín, Antioquia, 050021, Colombia

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Jaw, Edentulous, PartiallyMouth, Edentulous

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Jaw, EdentulousJaw DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesMouth DiseasesTooth Diseases

Study Officials

  • Andres Duque, MSc

    CES University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Pablo E Correa, MSc

    CES University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Astrid Giraldo, Postgraduate

    CES University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Andres Duque, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2012

First Posted

June 5, 2012

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion

November 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 5, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations