Effective Feedback to Improve Primary Care Prescribing Safety
EFIPPS
1 other identifier
interventional
262
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We hypothesise that feedback and feedback + psychology informed intervention delivered to primary care medical practices will reduce high-risk prescribing to patients compared to a simple educational intervention alone. The specific objectives are :
- 1.To test the effectiveness of the two EFIPPS feedback arms in reducing the specified primary outcome of a composite measure of high-risk antipsychotic, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and antiplatelet drug prescribing
- 2.To test the effectiveness of the two EFIPPS feedback arms in reducing the specified secondary outcomes of the six individual measures constituting the composite
- 3.To assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedOctober 7, 2014
October 1, 2014
1.3 years
May 17, 2012
October 5, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite measure of proportion of patients at risk of an adverse event from specified prescribing.
The primary outcome is a composite of six high-risk prescribing measures relating to antipsychotic, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet drug use. It is defined as the proportion of patients particularly at risk of an adverse event from the specified prescribing, who receives one or more high risk prescriptions. A composite is reasonable because each of the underlying indicators is based on evidence of harm and has been judged valid in one or more formal consensus studies, so the composite is a coherent measure of 'high-risk prescribing'.
Change in proportion of patients prescribed a high risk drug between baseline and 12 months after the intervention
Study Arms (3)
Usual care
PLACEBO COMPARATORUsual care + feedback of practice performance
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care + feedback + health psychology intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Practices in the usual care arm receive a one-off educational newsletter and support for searching for patients in their electronic health record in the form of downloadable searches
Usual care (educational newsletter and support for searching) plus quarterly feedback of practice rates of high risk prescribing compared to a benchmark of the upper quartile of all practices in the year before
Usual care (educational newsletter + support for searching) plus quarterly feedback plus health psychology informed intervention (persuasive communication and action planning) embedded in feedback
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- General medical practices in NHS Ayrshire and Arran, NHS Lanarkshire and NHS Lothian
You may not qualify if:
- Practices with \<250 registered patients
- Practices with \<93% of scripts in the new PIS data warehouse having a unique patient identifier (the Community Health Index \[CHI\] number)
- Practices which were formed after 1st January 2011
- Practices which cease to exist during the trial
- Practices which merge during the trial, where the merging practices were originally in different arms of the trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Dundeelead
- Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Governmentcollaborator
- University of Strathclydecollaborator
- Information Services Division, NHS Scotlandcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
NHS National Services Scotland
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Guthrie B, Treweek S, Petrie D, Barnett K, Ritchie LD, Robertson C, Bennie M. Protocol for the Effective Feedback to Improve Primary Care Prescribing Safety (EFIPPS) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial using ePrescribing data. BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 13;2(6):e002359. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002359. Print 2012.
PMID: 23242239RESULTGuthrie B, Kavanagh K, Robertson C, Barnett K, Treweek S, Petrie D, Ritchie L, Bennie M. Data feedback and behavioural change intervention to improve primary care prescribing safety (EFIPPS): multicentre, three arm, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2016 Aug 18;354:i4079. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4079.
PMID: 27540041DERIVEDBarnett KN, Bennie M, Treweek S, Robertson C, Petrie DJ, Ritchie LD, Guthrie B. Effective Feedback to Improve Primary Care Prescribing Safety (EFIPPS) a pragmatic three-arm cluster randomised trial: designing the intervention (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01602705). Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 11;9:133. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0133-9.
PMID: 25304255DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruce Guthrie
Professor of Primary Care
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Primary Care Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2012
First Posted
May 21, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10