A Comparison of Tumescence in Breast Reduction Surgery
3 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators' main hypothesis is that in breast reduction surgery, the use of tumescent solution containing both dilute lidocaine and epinephrine will lead to better control of postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, shorter time through postoperative phases of care, quicker discharge from the hospital and lower numbers of hospital readmissions than the use of tumescent solution containing only dilute epinephrine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 5, 2020
CompletedOctober 5, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.9 years
May 4, 2012
May 23, 2019
October 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Post-operative Pain
Aim 1 is to determine the effect of dilute lidocaine in tumescent solution on post-operative pain following breast reduction surgery. The data points that will be statistically compared will be pain scores determined via a validated pain survey (pain levels on a scale of 0-10 where 10 is the worst pain) and the amount of narcotic medication administered (in Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU), phase 2 and up to 24 hours post-op) determined from responses to survey questions and by reviewing the medical record.
Up to 24 hours following surgery
Amount of Post-Operative Narcotic Medication Administered
Aim 1 is to determine the effect of dilute lidocaine in tumescent solution on post-operative pain following breast reduction surgery. The amount of narcotic medication administered (in Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU), phase 2 and up to 24 hours post-op) determined by reviewing the medical record.
Up to 24 hours following surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting
Up to 24 hours following surgery
Anti-emetic / Intraoperative Medication Administered (mg)
Up to 24 hours following surgery
Anti-emetic / Intraoperative Fentanyl Administered (Measured in Micrograms)
Up to 24 hours following surgery
Time to Discharge
Up to 24 hours following surgery
Unplanned Hospital Readmission
Up to 1 week following surgery
Study Arms (2)
Tumescent solution with dilute epinephrine
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this arm of the study will be randomized to receive tumescent solution containing dilute epinephrine (1:1,000,000) during their breast reduction.
Tumescent solution with dilute lidocaine and epinephrine
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this arm of the study will receive tumescent solution containing both dilute lidocaine (0.05%) and dilute epinephrine (1:1,000,000).
Interventions
Tumescent Solution containing both dilute lidocaine (0.05%) and dilute epinephrine (1:1,000,000)
Tumescent Solution containing dilute epinephrine (1:1,000,000) only
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Women under the age of 18 years
- Breast feeding or pregnant women
- Incarcerated women.
- Women unable to give consent because of impaired decision making ability.
- Women who have reported allergies to the substances that will be used in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin Transformations Surgery Center
Middleton, Wisconsin, 53562, United States
Related Publications (11)
Lu L, Fine NA. The efficacy of continuous local anesthetic infiltration in breast surgery: reduction mammaplasty and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Jun;115(7):1927-34; discussion 1935-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000163332.04220.bd.
PMID: 15923838BACKGROUNDRawlani V, Kryger ZB, Lu L, Fine NA. A local anesthetic pump reduces postoperative pain and narcotic and antiemetic use in breast reconstruction surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jul;122(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181774349.
PMID: 18594373BACKGROUNDKryger ZB, Rawlani V, Lu L, Fine NA. Decreased postoperative pain, narcotic, and antiemetic use after breast reduction using a local anesthetic pain pump. Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Aug;61(2):147-52. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31815a23ef.
PMID: 18650606BACKGROUNDSchurr MJ, Gordon DB, Pellino TA, Scanlon TA. Continuous local anesthetic infusion for pain management after outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surgery. 2004 Oct;136(4):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.016.
PMID: 15467660BACKGROUNDCleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
PMID: 8080219BACKGROUNDQuality improvement guidelines for the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain. American Pain Society Quality of Care Committee. JAMA. 1995 Dec 20;274(23):1874-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530230060032.
PMID: 7500539BACKGROUNDKlein JA. Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1990 Mar;16(3):248-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1990.tb03961.x.
PMID: 2179348BACKGROUNDOstad A, Kageyama N, Moy RL. Tumescent anesthesia with a lidocaine dose of 55 mg/kg is safe for liposuction. Dermatol Surg. 1996 Nov;22(11):921-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00634.x.
PMID: 9063507BACKGROUNDLarson JD, Gutowski KA, Marcus BC, Rao VK, Avery PG, Stacey DH, Yang RZ. The effect of electroacustimulation on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain in outpatient plastic surgery patients: a prospective, randomized, blinded, clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar;125(3):989-94. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ccdc23.
PMID: 20195124BACKGROUNDHeller L, Kowalski AM, Wei C, Butler CE. Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of local anesthetic infusion and intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia pump for pain management after free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Oct;122(4):1010-1018. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181858c09.
PMID: 18827631BACKGROUNDChristie BM, Kapur S, Kempton SJ, Hanson SE, Ma Y, Rao VK. A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Lidocaine in Breast Reduction Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1074e-1079e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003243.
PMID: 28445354RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Venkat Rao
- Organization
- University of Wisconsin - Madison
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Venkat K Rao, M.D. M.B.A
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2012
First Posted
May 21, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 5, 2020
Results First Posted
October 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10