Ovarian Endometrioma Ablation Using Plasma Energy Versus Cystectomy
Prospective, Monocentric Study Comparing Cystectomy to PlasmaJet Ablation in the Surgical Management of Ovarian Endometriomas
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Objective: To compare loss of ovarian parenchyma following ovarian endometrioma ablation using the PlasmaJet system versus cystectomy, using postoperative examination by 3D ultrasound. Design: Prospective comparative study. Setting: Two experienced surgeons practicing in two University tertiary referral centers. Patients: Fifty women with no previous history of ovarian surgery managed for unilateral ovarian endometrioma \> 30 mm in diameter. Interventions: Endometrioma ablation by plasma energy using the PlasmaJet system and ovarian tissue sparing cystectomy. Main Outcome Measures: 3D ultrasound assessment of postoperative reduction in ovarian volume and antral follicle count (AFC) .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Nov 2010
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedMay 14, 2012
May 1, 2012
2.5 years
May 9, 2012
May 11, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Loss of ovarian volume
Evaluation of ovarian volumes of both the operated and the contralateral healthy ovary using a tridimensional ultrasound by vaginal route. The volume of each ovary expressed in cm³ was estimated using the formula D1 x D2 x D3 x π / 6. The Mann and Whitney test is performed to compare measurements made on the operated ovaries vs. those made on the contralateral ovaries.
3 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Decrease in ovarian antral follicles count (AFC)
3 months postoperatively
Antimullerian Hormone level (AMH)
3 months postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Ablation using the PlasmaJet system
EXPERIMENTALOrigin of cyst invagination is identified after lysis of adhesions between ovary and adjacent broad ligament, leading to characteristic "chocolate fluid" evacuation. Surgeon then attempts to turn cyst completely inside out via original invagination site of diameter averaging 1 to 2cm. Ablation of cyst's inner surface is performed using the PlasmaJet system in coagulation mode set at 40, at distance averaging 5mm from tip of handpiece, and with exposure time limited to 1 to 2s on each site. Care is taken not to leave any untreated sites and to ablate the edges of the invagination site and corresponding peritoneal implants on adjacent broad ligament. When cyst reversion is not feasible, surgeon progressively exposes cyst interior to guide plasma beam at an angle perpendicular to the inner surface.
Cystectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgical excision of an ovarian endometrioma by cystectomy involves three distinct areas, each requiring a different excision procedure. Area A from where cyst invagination originates, measures 1 cm² on average and is revealed by lysing adhesions between the ovary and the adjacent broad ligament, leading to the characteristic "chocolate fluid" evacuation. The excision by scissors of area A allows the surgeon to identify a cleavage plane close to the cyst wall, which can be followed without significant bleeding (area B). Should adhesions appear in the cleavage plane, they are coagulated and cut, so as not to strip the ovarian cortex. Close to the ovarian hilus, for complete cyst removal, adhesions require coagulation using bipolar current and section by scissors (area C).
Interventions
Ablation of the inner surface of the cyst is then performed using the PlasmaJet system in coagulation mode set at 40, at a distance averaging 5 mm from the tip of the handpiece, and with an exposure time limited to 1 to 2 seconds on each site. Care is taken not to leave any untreated sites and to ablate the edges of the invagination site and the corresponding peritoneal implants on the adjacent broad ligament.
Surgical excision of an ovarian endometrioma by cystectomy involves three distinct areas, each requiring a different excision procedure. Area A from where cyst invagination originates, measures 1 cm² on average and is revealed by lysing adhesions between the ovary and the adjacent broad ligament, leading to the characteristic "chocolate fluid" evacuation. The excision by scissors of area A allows the surgeon to identify a cleavage plane close to the cyst wall, which can be followed without significant bleeding (area B). Should adhesions appear in the cleavage plane, they are coagulated and cut, so as not to strip the ovarian cortex. Close to the ovarian hilus, for complete cyst removal, adhesions require coagulation using bipolar current and section by scissors (area C).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 45 years;
- Surgery required by pelvic pain or infertility related to endometriosis;
- Clinical and imaging data proving unilateral ovarian endometrioma which diameter exceeds 30 mm.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgery on ovaries or IVF procedures;
- Bilateral endometriomas;
- Pregnancy
- Woman not French speaker.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University Hospital
Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, 63033, France
University Hospital
Rouen, Seine-Maritime, 76031, France
Related Publications (1)
Roman H, Bubenheim M, Auber M, Marpeau L, Puscasiu L. Antimullerian hormone level and endometrioma ablation using plasma energy. JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):e2014.00002. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00002.
PMID: 25392649DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Horace Roman, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Rouen
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2012
First Posted
May 11, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 14, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05