Study of Two Teaching Techniques to Teach Cardiac Auscultation to Physicians
Self-Directed Study Using MP3 Players Versus Multimedia Lecture to Improve Auscultation Proficiency of Physicians: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
83
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our objective was to test two educational interventions for teaching cardiac auscultation: self-directed learning using portable audio files versus a single, massed multimedia lecture intervention similar to current best practice, to determine which would most effectively increase recognition of common cardiac sounds by physicians. The investigators hypothesized that doctors learning on their own time could better improve their skills.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 9, 2012
CompletedJune 2, 2021
May 1, 2021
5 months
May 8, 2012
May 28, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in auscultation score at 4 and 12 weeks
Primary outcome was an improvement in test score from pre-test to 4 and 12-week post-test. All participants took a 15-question pretest in addition to a posttest at 4 and 12 weeks using identical heart sound files to those used in training. Each test Tests consisted of 8-second clips of each heart sound file, with 10 beats of each sound.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Learner Satisfaction
12 weeks
Learner confidence
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl arm
Intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention arm
Interventions
Participants in the interventional arm of the study were given an MP3 player which contained eight, 15-second heart sound files (7 pathologic heart sound files and 1 normal heart sound file) alternated with nine leisure songs. MP3 players could play files in order or "shuffle" files in random order. Each heart sound file was introduced by the narrated phrase "Identify this sound,", followed by 10 beats of a heart sound recording, then the narrated identification of the heart sound. Participants were asked to use the MP3 player in order to improve their auscultation skills as often as they could and asked to record their activities while listening, but were given no further training.
Following the pretest, participants in the control arm received a 1-hour multimedia lecture (Power Point) taught by the same faculty member (AGK), which reviewed the pathophysiology, exacerbating and relieving factors, as well as visual diagrams of the heart sounds. The normal and seven pathologic heart sounds were played for participants during the lecture for a total of 2 minutes through high-quality home stereo speakers, exposing learners to 1280 beats in the 1-hour session. Abnormal sounds were taught in groups of systolic, diastolic and extra sounds, and were first introduced by name, and then as unknowns using mixed practice in each of the three sections.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All non-cardiologist physicians from one institution were eligible for the study. Participants were 83 non-cardiologist physician volunteers (57 practicing physicians, 26 residents in training) from one Academic Independent Medical Center in the Northeastern United States enrolled between January 11, 2011 and February 25, 2011.
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiologists,
- Non-physicians.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Reading Hospital and Medical Center
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19612, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anthony A Donato, MD
The Reading Hospital and Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antony G Kaliyadan, MD
The Reading Hospital and Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Program Director, Internal Medicine, Reading Hospital and Medical Center; Clinical Associate Professor, Internal Medicine, Jefferson Medical College
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2012
First Posted
May 11, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 9, 2012
Last Updated
June 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05