TAP Catheters Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Section
Quality of Recovery Following Administration of Transverse Abdominus Plane (TAP) Catheter as Compared to Intrathecal Morphine After Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: a Prospective, Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Morphine, when given as part of spinal anesthesia, is associated high incidence of nausea and pruritus, which may affect quality of recovery. The investigators hypothesize that long-acting local anesthetic infusions via TAP catheter can provide better quality of recovery after cesarean section than spinal morphine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedMay 8, 2012
May 1, 2012
9 months
April 30, 2012
May 7, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of recovery after cesarean section
To determine whether using continuous TAP catheters would result in a better quality of recovery after elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia as compared to intrathecal morphine using QoR-40 questionnaire
48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Incidence of nausea/vomiting
48 hours
incidence and severity of pruritus
48 hours
overall oral narcotic use during the 48 hours post-operatively
48 hours
Study Arms (2)
TAP catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndwelling TAP catheter placed at the end of c-section. It will be dosed with 20ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% at that time. Double lumen OnQ C-block pump containing 700 ml of the Ropivacaine 0.2% will be attached to the TAP catheters in the recovery room. The catheters will run at 7cc/hr/side for 50 hrs.
intrathecal morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.3 mg of intrathecal morphine
Interventions
dosed with 20ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% at that time. Double lumen pump containing 700 ml of the Ropivacaine 0.2% will be attached to the TAP catheters in the recovery room. The time that this occurs will be recorded in the eMAR. The catheters will run at 7cc/hr/side for 50 hrs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients age 18 - 45 years of age undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
- Ability to read and write English
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing other concomitant procedure
- Patients with history of diabetes or chronic steroid use
- Patients with chronic or recent (within 1 week prior to procedure) opioid use.
- Patients without the mental capacity to consent for the procedure/study.
- Patients requiring a translator in order to sign the consent for the procedure/study.
- Patients with a history of allergic reactions to local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stamford Anesthesiology Services, PClead
- I-Flowcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stamford Hospital
Stamford, Connecticut, 06904, United States
Related Publications (10)
Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):616-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 18020088BACKGROUNDLoane H, Preston R, Douglas MJ, Massey S, Papsdorf M, Tyler J. A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
PMID: 22410586BACKGROUNDEslamian L, Jalili Z, Jamal A, Marsoosi V, Movafegh A. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. J Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):334-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1336-3. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22354671BACKGROUNDMcMorrow RC, Ni Mhuircheartaigh RJ, Ahmed KA, Aslani A, Ng SC, Conrick-Martin I, Dowling JJ, Gaffney A, Loughrey JP, McCaul CL. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):706-12. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer061.
PMID: 21498494BACKGROUNDCostello JF, Moore AR, Wieczorek PM, Macarthur AJ, Balki M, Carvalho JC. The transversus abdominis plane block, when used as part of a multimodal regimen inclusive of intrathecal morphine, does not improve analgesia after cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):586-9. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181b4c922.
PMID: 19916252BACKGROUNDMcDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj CH, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):186-91, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3.
PMID: 18165577BACKGROUNDCharuluxananan S, Kyokong O, Somboonviboon W, Narasethakamol A, Promlok P. Nalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1789-1793. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000066015.21364.7D.
PMID: 12761013BACKGROUNDDe Oliveira GS Jr, Fitzgerald PC, Marcus RJ, Ahmad S, McCarthy RJ. A dose-ranging study of the effect of transversus abdominis block on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after outpatient laparoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1218-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182303a1a. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
PMID: 21926373BACKGROUNDMyles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
PMID: 10740540BACKGROUNDLiu SS, Wu CL. The effect of analgesic technique on postoperative patient-reported outcomes including analgesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2007 Sep;105(3):789-808. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278089.16848.1e.
PMID: 17717242BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- attending anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2012
First Posted
May 8, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 8, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05