Concentration of Antimicrobials in Catheter-lock Solutions
CONAN
Concentration and Antibiotic Activity in Antibiotic Lock Solutions
2 other identifiers
interventional
125
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The antibiotic lock technique (ALT) is used as local treatment for Catheter-Related Bacteremia (CRB). It consists in the administration of a concentrated antimicrobial solution with a calculated volume to fill the lumen of the catheter. The lock solution is indwelled within the catheter for a defined period of hours or days before been removed. Currently, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidelines for treatment and management of CRB, recommends to change the antibiotic solution every 24 hours. The investigators expect to determine the stability of the concentration of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline used in lock solutions, and thus to assay the optimal timeframe that the concentration of antibiotic used in lock solution keeps its in vivo antimicrobial activity. Study Hypothesis: An antibiotic lock solution maintains in vivo concentration and antimicrobial activity for at least 10 days after its infusion inside a subcutaneous port catheter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 19, 2015
February 1, 2015
2.7 years
April 24, 2012
February 18, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Antimicrobial concentration of catheter-lock solutions at the end of port indwelling time.
1 to 10 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Bioactivity of antimicrobials in lock solutions at the end of port indwelling time.
1 to 10 days
Anticoagulant activity of antimicrobial-lock solutions at the end of port indwelling time.
1 to 10 days
Study Arms (5)
Vancomycin antimicrobial-lock
EXPERIMENTALVancomycin antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 2 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Teicoplanin antimicrobial-lock
EXPERIMENTALTeicoplanin antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 10 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Linezolid antimicrobial-lock
EXPERIMENTALLinezolid antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 1.8 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Daptomycin antimicrobial-lock
EXPERIMENTALDaptomycin antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 5 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Tigecycline antimicrobial-lock
EXPERIMENTALTigecycline antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 4.5 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Interventions
Randomization of 5 patients into vancomycin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Randomization of 5 patients into teicoplanin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Randomization of 5 patients into linezolid antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Randomization of 5 patients into daptomycin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Randomization of 5 patients into tigecycline antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Intravenous access port recently inserted (≤ 3 days of insertion).
- Intravenous access port inserted more than 3 days before informed consent form signing patient. In this case, a blood sample from the catheter will be drawn for blood culture before administration of the antibiotic lock solution.
- Informed Consent Form Signed.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with confirmed or suspected local or systemic infection related to the catheter.
- Reported allergy or intolerance to the antibiotic employed for study lock solutions.
- Patients younger than 18 years old.
- Pregnant women or women in nursing period.
- Personal incapacity to subscribe the informed consent to participate in the clinical trial.
- Patient Replacement Criteria:
- All patients and/or their legal representatives will be inform that they can leave the clinical trial in whenever they wish to do it, without prejudice to their medical attention.
- Also, according to the criteria of the principal investigator, a patient could be separated from the clinical trial. The reasons to separate a patient from the study and replace him/her are:
- Severe adverse reaction that could threat the life of the patient.
- Resolution of the patient or from his/her legal representative to abandon the study.
- No attend to the extraction visit date.
- Development of clinical inconveniences that may indicate to abandon the study in behalf of the patient.
- While antibiotic lock solution is within the port, manipulation or use of the port for administration of any kind of medication or fluid.
- Impossibility to extract 4 ml of the antibiotic lock solution from the port.
- Impossibility to extract 5 ml of peripheral blood sample at the moment of extraction of the antibiotic lock solution.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008, Spain
Related Publications (12)
Del Pozo JL, Rodil R, Aguinaga A, Yuste JR, Bustos C, Montero A, Espinosa G, Garcia-Fernandez N. Daptomycin lock therapy for grampositive long-term catheter-related bloodstream infections. Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Mar;66(3):305-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02830.x.
PMID: 22340450RESULTDel Pozo JL, Garcia Cenoz M, Hernaez S, Martinez A, Serrera A, Aguinaga A, Alonso M, Leiva J. Effectiveness of teicoplanin versus vancomycin lock therapy in the treatment of port-related coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteraemia: a prospective case-series analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Nov;34(5):482-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
PMID: 19713086RESULTdel Pozo JL. Role of antibiotic lock therapy for the treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Int J Artif Organs. 2009 Sep;32(9):678-88. doi: 10.1177/039139880903200918.
PMID: 19882553RESULTMermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJ, Sherertz RJ, Warren DK. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):1-45. doi: 10.1086/599376.
PMID: 19489710RESULTdel Pozo JL, Patel R. The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Aug;82(2):204-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100247. Epub 2007 May 30.
PMID: 17538551RESULTSherertz RJ, Boger MS, Collins CA, Mason L, Raad II. Comparative in vitro efficacies of various catheter lock solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 May;50(5):1865-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1865-1868.2006.
PMID: 16641463RESULTFennell JP, O'Donohoe M, Cormican M, Lynch M. Linezolid lock prophylaxis of central venous catheter infection. J Med Microbiol. 2008 Apr;57(Pt 4):534-535. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47665-0.
PMID: 18349379RESULTLaPlante KL, Mermel LA. In vitro activity of daptomycin and vancomycin lock solutions on staphylococcal biofilms in a central venous catheter model. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Aug;22(8):2239-46. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm141. Epub 2007 Apr 1.
PMID: 17403700RESULTDel Pozo JL, Alonso M, Serrera A, Hernaez S, Aguinaga A, Leiva J. Effectiveness of the antibiotic lock therapy for the treatment of port-related enterococci, Gram-negative, or Gram-positive bacilli bloodstream infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;63(2):208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
PMID: 19026506RESULTRaad I, Hanna H, Jiang Y, Dvorak T, Reitzel R, Chaiban G, Sherertz R, Hachem R. Comparative activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline against catheter-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus bacteremic isolates embedded in biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 May;51(5):1656-60. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00350-06. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
PMID: 17353249RESULTRobinson JL, Tawfik G, Saxinger L, Stang L, Etches W, Lee B. Stability of heparin and physical compatibility of heparin/antibiotic solutions in concentrations appropriate for antibiotic lock therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):951-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki311. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
PMID: 16155063RESULTLabthavikul P, Petersen PJ, Bradford PA. In vitro activity of tigecycline against Staphylococcus epidermidis growing in an adherent-cell biofilm model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Dec;47(12):3967-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.12.3967-3969.2003.
PMID: 14638511RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
JOSE L DEL POZO, MD. Ph. D.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
- STUDY CHAIR
CESAR E BUSTOS, MD.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
- STUDY CHAIR
AITZIBER AGUINAGA, Pharm. D.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
- STUDY CHAIR
JOSE R YUSTE, MD. Ph.D.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
- STUDY CHAIR
JOSE R AZANZA, MD. Ph.D.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor, Ph. D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2012
First Posted
May 4, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 19, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02