Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension, 3% for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
The Efficacy and Safety of Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension, 3% in Subjects for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
369
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical study is to compare the safety and efficacy of mapracorat ophthalmic suspension, 3% with its vehicle for the treatment of postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jul 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 3, 2020
CompletedSeptember 3, 2020
August 1, 2020
11 months
May 2, 2012
August 18, 2020
August 18, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells
Anterior chamber (AC) cells were assessed using a 0 to 4 grading scale by an ophthalmologist using slip lamp biomicroscopy. A slit lamp examination of the lids, conjunctiva, limbus, cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous, and lens was performed without pupil dilation. Accumulation of white blood cells in aqueous was assessed. The grades were defined as: 0 = No cells seen; 1 = 1 - 5 cells; 2 = 6 - 15 cells; 3 = 16 - 30 cells; 4 = \>30 cells. Complete resolution of AC cells was defined as Grade 0.
8 days
Percentage of Participants With Grade 0 Pain
Ocular pain was defined as a positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching. The scores ranged from 0=None to 5=Severe, where higher scores indicated worse pain.
8 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells.
15 days
Percentage of Participants With Grade 0 Pain
15 days
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Flare.
15 days
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells and Flare.
15 days
Change From Baseline Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells and Flare Combined
15 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mapracorat
EXPERIMENTALMapracorat ophthalmic suspension, 3%,
Vehicle
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe vehicle of the mapracorat ophthalmic suspension
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who are candidates for routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery.
- Subjects who, in the Investigator's opinion, have potential postoperative pinhole Snellen visual acuity (VA) of at least 20/200 in the study eye.
- Subjects who have ≥ Grade 2 (6 - 15 cells) AC cells in the study eye following cataract surgery (postoperative day 1).
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have a severe/serious ocular condition or history/presence of chronic generalized systemic disease that the Investigator feels might increase the risk to the subject or confound the result(s) of the study.
- Any intraocular inflammation in either eye (cells or flare score greater than Grade 0 at slit lamp examination) or ocular pain greater than Grade 1 in the study eye at the Screening Visit.
- Presence of active external ocular disease: infection or inflammation of the study eye.
- Subjects who have known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the study drug(s) or their components.
- Subjects who currently require or are expected to require treatment with any medication listed as a disallowed medication per the Disallowed Therapy section of the protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Rochester, New York, 14609, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Bausch Health
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Quintus Ngumah, OD, PhD
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2012
First Posted
May 3, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 3, 2020
Results First Posted
September 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08