Laryngeal Injuries After Anesthesia Induction With Sevoflurane and After Anesthesia Induction With Rocuronium
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Anesthesia induction with sevoflurane is not associated with an increased incidence or severity of laryngeal injuries compared with an anesthesia induction with a muscle relaxant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedFebruary 15, 2013
February 1, 2013
10 months
April 27, 2012
February 13, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
incidence of vocal cord injuries
24 h after tracheal intubation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
incidence of hoarseness
24h, 48 h, and 72 h after tracheal intubation
incidence of soar throat
24h, 48h, and 72 h after tracheal intubation
Study Arms (2)
sevoflurane
ACTIVE COMPARATORanesthesia induction with propofol, remifentanil and sevoflurane
rocuronium
ACTIVE COMPARATORanesthesia induction with propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium
Interventions
anesthesia induction with propofol, remifentanil and sevoflurane; afterwards tracheal intubation
anesthesia induction with propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium; afterwards tracheal intubation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ear-nose-throat surgery
- orotracheal intubation for surgery of the ear
You may not qualify if:
- obesity
- allergy against the study drugs
- patients with a known or suspected difficult airway (Mallampati score 3 or 4 and a mouth opening \< 3.5 cm).
- all patients were examined by stroboscopy one day before surgery and were excluded from the study when preexisting pathologies of the vocal cords were found
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Rostock
Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 18057, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Mencke T, Jacobs RM, Machmueller S, Sauer M, Heidecke C, Kallert A, Pau HW, Noeldge-Schomburg G, Ovari A. Intubating conditions and side effects of propofol, remifentanil and sevoflurane compared with propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium: a randomised, prospective, clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 May 22;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-39. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24860256DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Invastigator, Clinical Associate Professor, Dr. Thomas Mencke
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2012
First Posted
May 3, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-02