Real-Time fMRI Feedback Effects on Pain Perception
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging may be a viable treatment for chronic pain in the future.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 14, 2019
CompletedJune 14, 2019
March 1, 2019
6.1 years
February 10, 2012
May 10, 2018
March 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Average Unpleasantness
All participants will undergo thermal pain threshold testing directly before (Baseline) and after MRI. Participants will be asked to rate pain unpleasantness, on a scale of 0-10, before the fMRI Paradigm (Baseline) and directly after the fMRI paradigm (after MRI). 0="no unpleasantness" and 10="worst unpleasantness imaginable"
Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours
Average Pain Rating
All participants will undergo thermal pain threshold testing directly before (Baseline) and after MRI scan.Participants will be asked to rate painfulness of the thermal stimuli applied, on a scale of 0-10, before the fMRI Paradigm (Baseline) and directly after the fMRI paradigm (after MRI). 0="no pain" and 10="worst pain imaginable"
Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours
Ability to Distract
All participants will undergo thermal pain threshold testing before and after fMRI paradigm. Participants will rate the ability to distract themselves from the thermal stimuli, on a scale of 0-10, before fMRI paradigm (Baseline) and after fMRI paradigm, 0="not able to distract at all" and 10="completely able to distract". A Higher rating represents greater ability to distract from thermal pain stimuli.
Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours
Study Arms (2)
ACC Real Time fMRI Feedback
EXPERIMENTALEach participant will undergo thermal pain threshold assessments ten times using the Medoc Pathway System with MRI-compatible ATS Thermode (30mmX30mm; Medoc Inc, Israel). Participants will be instructed to "focus on the thermal stimuli" for the first 5 trials, and to engage in three cognitive pain inhibition strategies (Attention/Distraction Strategy, Stimulus Quality/Severity Strategy, and the Control Strategy. The participants will be randomly assigned to receive Real Time fMRI Feedback of inverse activation in the rACC after each pain/rest block during the last 3 fMRI scans in the form of two simple thermometer images on the in-scanner computer display.
PFC Real Time fMRI Feedback
EXPERIMENTALEach participant will undergo thermal pain threshold assessments ten times using the Medoc Pathway System with MRI-compatible ATS Thermode (30mmX30mm; Medoc Inc, Israel). Participants will be instructed to "focus on the thermal stimuli" for the first 5 trials, and to engage in three cognitive pain inhibition strategies (Attention/Distraction Strategy, Stimulus Quality/Severity Strategy, and the Control Strategy. The participants will be randomly assigned to receive Real Time fMRI Feedback of inverse activation in the PFC after each pain/rest block during the last 3 fMRI scans in the form of two simple thermometer images on the in-scanner computer display.
Interventions
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attend away from the thermal stimulus (for example, to the other side of the body). Vividly imagine they are somewhere else, or engage in a high-demanding mental task such as counting backward by 7's or completing math problems to distract from the experience
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attempt to perceive the stimulus as a neutral sensory experience rather than pain. Attempt to perceive the stimulus as low intensity rather than high intensity.
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attempt to take control of their perception of the painful experience.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy adults ages 18-65
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical depression
- Anxiety
- Substance dependence or chronic pain
- Ferrous metal implants
- Cardiac pacemakers or other implanted medical devices that might be adversely impacted by the MRI scanner magnetic field
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jeffrey J. Borckardt
- Organization
- Medical University of South Carolina
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffery J Borckardt, PhD
Medical University of South Carolina
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2012
First Posted
April 30, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 14, 2019
Results First Posted
June 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03