Study Stopped
The PI of this study is leaving the institution and enrollment was progressing slowly so we decided to close the study.
Patient Satisfaction With Pain Relief After Ambulatory Hand Surgery
Satisfaction With Pain Relief After Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adequate pain relief has been a priority of the Joint Commission and is featured on national inpatient surveys such as the H-CAHPS. When considering methods for improving satisfaction with pain relief in the United States, a great deal of emphasis has been placed on opioid pain medications. Some of this emphasis on opioid pain medication is driven by the pharmaceutical industry and by advocacy groups with ties to the pharmaceutical industry. There is evidence that the "pain is the fifth vital sign" campaign of the Joint Commission led to an increased incidence of prescription of opioids, but there is less evidence of improved satisfaction with pain relief. There is some evidence of an increase in opioid-related adverse events. As the sales of opioids have tripled from 1999-2008, so has the number of deaths caused by opioid overdose; 14,800 in 2008. The number of visits to the Emergency Department for opioid overdose doubled between 2004 and 2008. Patients in other countries take far less opioid pain medication and are equally satisfied with pain relief. For instance, Lindenhovius et al. found in a retrospective study that Dutch patients take a weak (Tramadol) or no opioid pain medication after ankle fracture surgery and have comparable or better satisfaction with pain relief than American patients, most of whom take oxycodone. That study was repeated prospectively (unpublished) and confirmed that Dutch patients do not feel their pain is undertreated. A study of morphine use after a femur fracture demonstrated that American patients used far more than Vietnamese patients (30 mg/kg versus 0.9 mg/kg), but were more dissatisfied with their pain relief. These sociological differences are striking and suggest strongly that personal factors may be the most important determinant of satisfaction with pain relief. It is our impression that most American hand surgeons give patients a prescription for an opioid pain medication after carpal tunnel release, and that is certainly true in our practice. This seems to be based primarily on the outliers, and intended to avoid confrontation with patients that desire opioids; however, most patients take little or no narcotic pain medication, and many who do use the opioids complain of the side effects-nausea and pruritis in particular. It is therefore not clear whether routine opioids is the optimal pain management strategy after carpal tunnel release. In the study of Stahl et al. from Israel, patients were prescribed acetaminophen rather than opioids after carpal tunnel release and only 20 of 50 patients used acetaminophen; 30 patients did not use acetaminophen or other pain medication at all after the operation. Our aim is to determine if there is a difference in satisfaction with pain relief between patients advised to take opioids compared to patients advised to use over the counter acetaminophen after carpal tunnel release under local anesthesia. A secondary aim is to determine if personal factors account for more of the variability in satisfaction with pain relief than opioid strategy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jul 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 14, 2016
CompletedMarch 14, 2017
February 1, 2017
3.5 years
April 25, 2012
January 11, 2016
February 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction With Pain Relief
an 11-point ordinal scale to ask for the satisfaction of the patients with pain relief. The scale range is from 0-10, where 0 is complete dissatisfaction with pain relief and 10 is complete satisfaction.
at the follow-up, 2 weeks after the operation with suture removal
Secondary Outcomes (8)
QuickDASH
At enrollment prior to surgery
PSEQ
1 day
PHQ-9
1 day
Pain Patients Expect After Surgery
1 day
Expectation of Pain Relief
1 day
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Vicodin 5/325 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORHalf of the patients will be randomized to Vicodin
Acetaminophen 325 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORHalf of the patients will be randomized to Acetaminophen
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older.
- All subjects will be competent adults able to consent on their own behalf for surgery and care.
- Carpal tunnel release
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to give informed consent
- Non English-speaking subjects
- Patients with hypersensitivity to acetaminophen or hydrocodone
- Patients with chronic alcohol abuse
- Patients with hypothyroidism
- Patients with Addison's disease
- Patients with prostatic hypertrophy or urethral stricture
- Patients using any of the following medications:
- MAO or tricyclic antidepressants Antihistaminics Antipsychotic or anti-anxiety medications Phenothiazines Zidovudin Phenobarbital
- Patients who are taking opioid pain medication for another reason prior to surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Neal Chen, MD
- Organization
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David C Ring, MD PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2012
First Posted
April 30, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 14, 2017
Results First Posted
April 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-02