NCT01584336

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer compared with open total gastrectomy. This study will performed via prospective, multicenter design.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
168

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2 gastric-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_2 gastric-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 24, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2012

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

April 22, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 5, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Gastric cancer, laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality

    The primary purpose of this study is that the incidence of morbidity and mortality after LATG. We will access the postoperative morbidity including as follows: wound complication, intra-abdominal fluid collection or abscess, intra-abdominal bleeding, intraluminal bleeding, intestinal obstruction, ileus, anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic leakage, fistula, pancreatitis, pulmonary complication, urinary complication, renal complication, hepatic complication, cardiac complication, endocrine complication, and stasis. Also we will evaluate the incidence of postoperative mortality after LATG.

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • the surgical outcomes according to the method of reconstruction

    1 month

Study Arms (1)

LATG group

EXPERIMENTAL

It means the patients who will be enrolled in our study.

Procedure: LATG

Interventions

LATGPROCEDURE

1. After laparoscopic observation, the surgeon must check the possibility of laparoscopic surgery (without the serosal invasion of cancer or peritoneal metastasis or lymph node metastasis to splenic hilum). If the gastric cancer with serosal invasion or grossly lymph node metastasis to splenic hilum, operator must convert the operation method to open gastrectomy 2. The operator undergoes the laparoscopic total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection(including the status of lymph nodes - No #1,2,3,4sa,4sb,4d,5,6,7,8a,9,11p and 11d, and/or 12a). 3. The operator can choose any reconstruction method of esophagojejunostomy according to surgeon's preference. 4. After then, the operator performs the jejunojejunostomy.

Also known as: Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG)
LATG group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pathologically diagnosed as gastric adenocarcinoma under preoperative endoscopic biopsy
  • range of age ; over 20 years to under 80 years
  • preoperative stage : cT1N0M0, cT1N1M0, cT2N0M0 (7th UICC)
  • The patient who is needed the total gastrectomy because the upper margin of cancer is located between upper 1cm and lower 5cm to esophagogastric junction
  • the gastric cancer which is not included the indication of the endoscopic mucosal dissection
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status; 0 and 1
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score ; 1, 2, 3
  • Written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient who shows distant metastasis under preoperative examination
  • The patient with medical history for upper abdominal surgery with open method in the past
  • The patient with medical history for distal gastrectomy due to benign or malignant gastric disease in the past(remnant stomach cancer)
  • The patient with double cancer synchronous or metachronous within 5 years
  • Enlarged lymph nodes of the splenic hilum in the preoperative evaluation
  • The patient who has been enrolled other clinical study within 6 months
  • Vulnerable patients who lacks mental capacity and are pregnant or planning a pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital

Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 420-767, South Korea

RECRUITING

Ajou University Hospital

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 443-749, South Korea

RECRUITING

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Daegu, 700-712, South Korea

RECRUITING

Kyungpook National University medical Center

Daegu, 702-210, South Korea

RECRUITING

Incheon St, Mary's Hostpial, The Catholic University of Korea

Incheon, 403-720, South Korea

RECRUITING

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, 110-744, South Korea

RECRUITING

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, 110-799, South Korea

RECRUITING

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, 110-799, South Korea

RECRUITING

Yonsei University Severance Hospital

Seoul, 120-752, South Korea

RECRUITING

Yonsei University Severance Hospital

Seoul, 120-752, South Korea

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Kim SG, Lee YJ, Ha WS, Jung EJ, Ju YT, Jeong CY, Hong SC, Choi SK, Park ST, Bae K. LATG with extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy: is this minimal invasive surgery for gastric cancer? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Aug;18(4):572-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0106.

    PMID: 18721007BACKGROUND
  • Kunisaki C, Makino H, Oshima T, Fujii S, Kimura J, Takagawa R, Kosaka T, Akiyama H, Morita S, Endo I. Application of the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1300-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1367-5. Epub 2010 Oct 17.

    PMID: 20953884BACKGROUND
  • Nunobe S, Hiki N, Tanimura S, Kubota T, Kumagai K, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. Three-step esophagojejunal anastomosis with atraumatic anvil insertion technique after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Sep;15(9):1520-5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1489-7. Epub 2011 May 10.

    PMID: 21557017BACKGROUND
  • Okabe H, Obama K, Tanaka E, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Itami A, Watanabe G, Kanaya S, Sakai Y. Intracorporeal esophagojejunal anastomosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):2167-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9987-8. Epub 2008 Jun 14.

    PMID: 18553203BACKGROUND
  • Kim MG, Kim BS, Kim TH, Kim KC, Yook JH, Kim BS. The effects of laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy on surgical outcomes in the treatment of gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011 Apr;80(4):245-50. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.80.4.245. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

  • Kanagale P, Lohray BB, Misra A, Davadra P, Kini R. Formulation and optimization of porous osmotic pump-based controlled release system of oxybutynin. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007 Jul 13;8(3):E53. doi: 10.1208/pt0803053.

  • Mochiki E, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, Andoh H, Ohno T, Aihara R, Asao T, Kuwano H. Laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for upper and middle gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):1997-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0015-9. Epub 2008 Jul 2.

  • Kawamura H, Yokota R, Homma S, Kondo Y. Comparison of invasiveness between laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2009 Nov;33(11):2389-95. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0208-y.

  • Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Takemura M, Tanaka Y, Fujiwara Y, Osugi H. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: experience with more than 600 cases. Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1161-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9786-2. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

  • Lee SE, Ryu KW, Nam BH, Lee JH, Kim YW, Yu JS, Cho SJ, Lee JY, Kim CG, Choi IJ, Kook MC, Park SR, Kim MJ, Lee JS. Technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;100(5):392-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.21345.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stomach Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesStomach Diseases

Study Officials

  • Gyu-Seok Cho, M.D., Ph.D.

    Soonchunhyang University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Gyu-Seok Cho, M.D., Ph.D.

CONTACT

Gui-Ae Jeong, M.D., Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2012

First Posted

April 24, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

March 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 6, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-02

Locations