Study Stopped
Logistical reasons (institutional reorganization of ambulatory surgery)
Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Venous Access Port Implantation
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two different surgical techniques for implementation of totally implantable central venous access ports. Ultrasound-guided suclavian vein puncture is compared to cephalic vein dissection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jun 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedOctober 23, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.5 years
April 21, 2012
October 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
surgical procedure time
during surgical procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
primary implementation success rate
during surgical procedure
overall implementation success rate
during surgical procedure
technique conversion rate and causes
during surgical procedure
pain during surgical procedure
during surgical procedure
pain at 5 days
5 days post-procedure
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
US-guided subclavian vein puncture
EXPERIMENTALCephalic vein dissection
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Central venous access port implementation through ultrasound-guided subclavian vein puncture and Seldinger technique
Central venous access port implementation through cephalic vein dissection and cutdown
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18
- Informed consent
- Need for central venous access port implementation under local anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Impaired blood clotting
- Ongoing antiplatelet drugs therapy, except acetylsalicylic acid
- Trauma or surgical past history on both shoulder girdles
- Known central venous thrombosis (subclavian vein, upper vena cava)
- Known pneumothorax
- Septic state
- Agranulocytosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Lausanne, Department of Visceral Surgery
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nicolas Demartines
University Hospital Lausanne, Department of Visceral Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2012
First Posted
April 24, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10