NCT01581606

Brief Summary

Hypothesis: The use of teleophthalmology for patient screening will result in more rapid patient access for treatment. The use of teleophthalmology to monitor patients with wet AMD post-treatment will result in maintenance of good visual outcomes combined with a reduction in patient travel and improved patients satisfaction in a cost effective manner. Objectives : The Evaluation of Teleophthalmology in AMD project objectives are as follows:

  1. 1.To evaluate the efficacy of teleophthalmology in screening patients referred to retina specialists for suspected wet AMD.
  2. 2.To compare the "time to treatment/retreatment" with this program with that of patient's entering the system and being followed conventionally to determine the efficacy of teleophthalmology to provide rapid entry/re-entry into treatment programs.
  3. 3.To determine the efficacy of teleophthalmology in monitoring patients with wet AMD post therapy.
  4. 4.To determine the compliance rate for monitoring wet AMD during follow-up utilizing teleophthalmology.
  5. 5.To evaluate the cost effectiveness of teleophthalmology in screening/monitoring wet AMD patients including direct costs to the OHIP system and indirect costs to the patient/caregiver.
  6. 6.To assess patient satisfaction with teleophthalmology versus standard clinical care in the monitoring of post-treatment wet AMD.
  7. 7.To evaluate teleophthalmology as a tool for communication between community based Optometrists /Ophthalmologists and Retina Specialists.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
169

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2013

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 12, 2012

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2012

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 30, 2013

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 4, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 7, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

November 6, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 12, 2012

Last Update Submit

November 2, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Age Related Macular DegenerationTeleophthalmologyScreeningDiagnosisTimingTreatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Wait time for treatment (naive versus follow-up patients).

    One month for Tele-screening evaluation in both groups.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient satisfaction.

    One month.

Study Arms (2)

Group 1R and 1T AMD Screening

Group 1 patients will be collected through all referrals to any of the physician investigators with a provisional diagnosis of possible wet AMD. Any request for clinical evaluation of a patient for presumed wet AMD will be randomized into Group 1R (Routine Screening) and Group 1T (Tele-ophthalmology screening).

Group 2R and 2T Follow up

Group 2 patients will be collected from the patients previously treated for wet AMD within the practices of the physician investigators. All patients in whom the disease is inactive (not receiving active treatment) and who therefore require monitoring will be randomized into Group 2R (Routine Monitoring) and Group 2T (Teleophthalmology Monitoring).

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Group 1: Patients will be collected from all referrals with a provisional diagnosis of possible Wet-AMD to any of the physician investigators. Group 2: Subjects will be collected from patients previously treated at this institution for wet-AMD within the practices of the physician investigators.

You may qualify if:

  • Group 1: Patients will be collected from all referrals with a provisional diagnosis of possible Wet-AMD to any of the physician investigators. These patients will subsequently be randomized into Group 1R (Routine Screening) and Group 1T (Tele-ophthalmology Screening)
  • Group 2: Patients will be collected from patients previously treated at this institution for Wet-AMD within the practices of the physician investigators. All patients in whom the disease is inactive (not receiving active treatment) and who require monitoring will be randomized into Group 2R (Routine Monitoring) and Group 2T (Tele-Ophthalmology Monitoring).

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients will be excluded if they live more than an hours driving distance from London or from one of the afore-mentioned Ocular Health Centre(s)
  • Patients with a presumed diagnosis of Wet-AMD at the time of referral who have previously had diagnostic imaging performed as part of the referral will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care

London, Ontario, N6A 4V2, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Li B, Powell AM, Hooper PL, Sheidow TG. Prospective evaluation of teleophthalmology in screening and recurrence monitoring of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;133(3):276-82. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5014.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Macular DegenerationDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesEye DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Thomas G Sheidow, MD, FRCSC

    Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2012

First Posted

April 20, 2012

Study Start

April 30, 2013

Primary Completion

April 4, 2014

Study Completion

April 7, 2014

Last Updated

November 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-11

Locations