Evaluation of TeleOphthalmology in AMD-TeleMedicine Solutions to Improve Patient Access and Quality of Vision Outcomes
1 other identifier
observational
169
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis: The use of teleophthalmology for patient screening will result in more rapid patient access for treatment. The use of teleophthalmology to monitor patients with wet AMD post-treatment will result in maintenance of good visual outcomes combined with a reduction in patient travel and improved patients satisfaction in a cost effective manner. Objectives : The Evaluation of Teleophthalmology in AMD project objectives are as follows:
- 1.To evaluate the efficacy of teleophthalmology in screening patients referred to retina specialists for suspected wet AMD.
- 2.To compare the "time to treatment/retreatment" with this program with that of patient's entering the system and being followed conventionally to determine the efficacy of teleophthalmology to provide rapid entry/re-entry into treatment programs.
- 3.To determine the efficacy of teleophthalmology in monitoring patients with wet AMD post therapy.
- 4.To determine the compliance rate for monitoring wet AMD during follow-up utilizing teleophthalmology.
- 5.To evaluate the cost effectiveness of teleophthalmology in screening/monitoring wet AMD patients including direct costs to the OHIP system and indirect costs to the patient/caregiver.
- 6.To assess patient satisfaction with teleophthalmology versus standard clinical care in the monitoring of post-treatment wet AMD.
- 7.To evaluate teleophthalmology as a tool for communication between community based Optometrists /Ophthalmologists and Retina Specialists.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 4, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 7, 2014
CompletedNovember 6, 2017
November 1, 2017
11 months
April 12, 2012
November 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wait time for treatment (naive versus follow-up patients).
One month for Tele-screening evaluation in both groups.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction.
One month.
Study Arms (2)
Group 1R and 1T AMD Screening
Group 1 patients will be collected through all referrals to any of the physician investigators with a provisional diagnosis of possible wet AMD. Any request for clinical evaluation of a patient for presumed wet AMD will be randomized into Group 1R (Routine Screening) and Group 1T (Tele-ophthalmology screening).
Group 2R and 2T Follow up
Group 2 patients will be collected from the patients previously treated for wet AMD within the practices of the physician investigators. All patients in whom the disease is inactive (not receiving active treatment) and who therefore require monitoring will be randomized into Group 2R (Routine Monitoring) and Group 2T (Teleophthalmology Monitoring).
Eligibility Criteria
Group 1: Patients will be collected from all referrals with a provisional diagnosis of possible Wet-AMD to any of the physician investigators. Group 2: Subjects will be collected from patients previously treated at this institution for wet-AMD within the practices of the physician investigators.
You may qualify if:
- Group 1: Patients will be collected from all referrals with a provisional diagnosis of possible Wet-AMD to any of the physician investigators. These patients will subsequently be randomized into Group 1R (Routine Screening) and Group 1T (Tele-ophthalmology Screening)
- Group 2: Patients will be collected from patients previously treated at this institution for Wet-AMD within the practices of the physician investigators. All patients in whom the disease is inactive (not receiving active treatment) and who require monitoring will be randomized into Group 2R (Routine Monitoring) and Group 2T (Tele-Ophthalmology Monitoring).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded if they live more than an hours driving distance from London or from one of the afore-mentioned Ocular Health Centre(s)
- Patients with a presumed diagnosis of Wet-AMD at the time of referral who have previously had diagnostic imaging performed as part of the referral will be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Li B, Powell AM, Hooper PL, Sheidow TG. Prospective evaluation of teleophthalmology in screening and recurrence monitoring of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;133(3):276-82. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5014.
PMID: 25473945DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas G Sheidow, MD, FRCSC
Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2012
First Posted
April 20, 2012
Study Start
April 30, 2013
Primary Completion
April 4, 2014
Study Completion
April 7, 2014
Last Updated
November 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11