Comparison of Early Versus Delay Reconstruction in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tearing
Study of Surgical Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tearing
1 other identifier
interventional
202
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which surgical method is better for anterior cruciate ligament teas in outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2012
CompletedApril 19, 2012
April 1, 2012
Same day
April 18, 2012
April 18, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
quality of life
SF-36 questionnaire consists of 36 questions (two main components: physical and mental), each of which was assigned a score ranging from 0 to 100.
at 6 months post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Tegner activity score
at 6 months post-operatively
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
at 6 months post-operatively
Study Arms (2)
early
OTHERpatients underwent \< 8 weeks reconstruction after injury
delay
OTHERpatients underwent \> 8 weeks reconstruction after injury
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a. patients with confirmed anterior cruciate ligament tearing
You may not qualify if:
- One of the following associated injuries to the index knee as visualized on MRI and/or arthroscopy:
- An unstable longitudinal meniscus tear that requires repair and where the following postoperative treatment (i.e. bracing and limited ROM) interferes with the rehabilitation protocol
- Bi-compartmental extensive meniscus resections
- A cartilage injury representing a full thickness loss down to bone
- A total rupture of MCL/LCL as visualized on MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al-zahra university hospital
Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
hamidreza shemshaki, MD
MD,research comittee
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principle
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2012
First Posted
April 19, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 19, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-04