Comparison Between Anterior and Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach and Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Prospective Randomized Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In total hip arthroplasty several approaches can be used. The newly introduced minimally invasive anterior approach is supposed to cause less damage to tendons and muscles. At the same time there are reports that there are more complications when this approach is used. The direct lateral approach is the most used in Norway and is well documented. There are however those who postulate that there is to high risk of damage to the gluteus medius causing Trendelenburg gait. In the investigators hospital both the anterior and direct lateral approach is used with good result. The investigators main study hypothesis is that there is no difference between the use of anterior or direct lateral approach i total hip arthroplasty in regards to postoperative function and pain, complications, radiological finds (X-ray and MRI), markers for muscle damage (i.e CK-total) or other clinical outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedJune 14, 2013
June 1, 2013
4.9 years
March 13, 2012
June 13, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in function
Function of the operated hip will be evaluated after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months using Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score and 6-minute-walk-test. Improvement in general health will be evaluated by using Eq-5D.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Muscle damage
Day of operation and next four consecutive days
Pain
First four postoperative days
X-ray assessment
3 and 12 months
MRI
3 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Direct lateral approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient operated using direct lateral approach.
Anterior approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient operated using anterior approach.
Interventions
The use of direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty
The use of anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical and radiological diagnosis of coxarthrosis
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgery on affected hip
- No mental disability preventing follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sorlandet Hospital HF
Arendal, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Svein Andreas Svenningsen, M.D, Ph.D
Sorlandet Hospital HF
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2012
First Posted
April 17, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 14, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-06