Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Imidafenacin and Fesoterodine in Patients With Overactive Bladder
Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Imidafenacin Versus Fesoterodine in Patients With Overactive Bladder
1 other identifier
interventional
207
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy and safety after 12 weeks oral administration of Imidafenacin 0.1mg b.i.d versus Fesoterodine 4mg once daily for the urge incontinence and/or increased urinary frequency associated with urgency as may occur in patients with overactive bladder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2012
CompletedApril 16, 2012
April 1, 2012
10 months
April 12, 2012
April 13, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in daily mean urination frequency between the end of treatment period(Week 12) and the end of observation period(Baseline, Week 0)
up to 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Difference in daily mean Urinary incontinence frequency between each evaluation time(treatment period Week 4, Week 8, Week 12) and the end of observation period(Baseline, week 0)
up to 12 weeks
Difference in daily mean urge incontinence frequency between each evaluation time(treatment period Week 4, Week 8, Week 12) and the end of observation period(Baseline, week 0)
up to 12 weeks
Difference in daily mean nocturia frequency between each evaluation time(treatment period Week 4, Week 8, Week 12) and the end of observation period(Baseline, week 0)
up to 12 weeks
Difference in daily mean urination frequency between each evaluation time(treatment period Week 4, Week 8) and the end of observation period(baselien, week 0)
up to 12 weeks
Difference in QoL score between each evaluation time(treatment period Week 4, Week 8, Week 12) and the end of observation period(Baseline, week 0)
up to 12 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Imidafenacin
EXPERIMENTALFesoterodine
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients with overactive bladder aged 20 years or more
- subject who had the continuos symptom for 3 months or more
- subject prepare a symptom diary and was deemed eligible for the study by the investigator
- times or more of daily mean urination frequency
- times or more of daily mean frequency of a sense of urinary urgency or 2 times or more of urge incontinence frequency
You may not qualify if:
- subjects with clinically significant stress urge incontinence, patients with urinary tract infections or relapsing urinary tract infections who had received treatment more than 4 times in the previous year
- subjects with diseases prohibiting anti-cholinergics from administration
- subjects who used an indwelling catheter or intermittent self intubation program, patients who had prostatic hyperplasia, prostatic cancer, bladder cancer,bladder stones, interstitial cystitis as complications
- subjects who received lower urinary tract surgery within 6 months
- subjects with a catheter placed or intermittent catheterization
- subjects who were deemed ineligible for the study by the investigator or sub-investigator, pregnant women, nursing women, and women who are planning pregnancy or have not used proper contraceptives during the study period
- subjects who are within 1 month after other clinical study was completed
- subjects having 100mL or more of residual urine
- subjects who had acute urinary retention history
- subjects who have been administered Prohibited concomitant medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- LG Life Scienceslead
- Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltdcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
KYU-SUNG LEE, M.D.
Samsung Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2012
First Posted
April 16, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 16, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-04