Hair2Go Label Comprehension and Usability Study
OHR6-LCU
Evaluating Label Comprehension and Usability of the Hair2Go System
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test label comprehension and usability of the hair removal device in 60 male and female participants. The study population will represent the US demographic distribution of skin types and will include varying levels of literacy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 11, 2013
CompletedDecember 25, 2013
November 1, 2013
1 month
April 13, 2012
April 4, 2013
November 27, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percent of Participants Correctly Determining Eligibility for Use of the Device (Responders)
Label comprehension will be based on responses to a questionnaire. Questions will be based on a tiered system by level of importance in responding correctly according to the following: 1. Questions regarding safe use of the system. 2. Questions regarding correct use of the system(not related to safety). In order to demonstrate how well the label instruction, as a whole, was understood by all subjects, the proportion of subjects who correctly understood the label as a whole was calculated by classifying each subject as either a "responder" or "non-responder" based on the following criteria regarding all questions: A subject was considered a responder if he/she correctly answered 11/12 questions related to safety AND 5/6 low category questions not related to safety. The study was considered a success if the response rate (i.e., the proportion of subjects correctly understanding the label based on the responder criteria) was at least 90%.
1 hour
Percentage of Participants Performing Critical/Non-critical Errors
Study staff will record the number of errors according to the following: 1. Critical error: an error that may cause a serious adverse event or an adverse event from a single occurrence 2. Non critical error: An error that, if repeated without correction/intervention, may cause an adverse event.
1-2 hours
Study Arms (1)
Hair2Go device
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Treatment with the device once under observation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females, between 18 and 65 years of age.
- Able to read and understand the written consent form.
- Willing to sign informed consent.
- Able to read and speak English.
- Willing and able to participate in the study procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- The participant or anyone in their household is currently employed by a marketing research department or company, an advertising agency or public relations firm, a pharmaceutical company, a healthcare device manufacturer, a cosmetic or personal care company.
- The participant is currently employed at a salon, day spa or beauty school/college as a stylist, barber, esthetician or beauty instructor.
- The respondent has ever been trained or employed as a healthcare professional.
- The participant normally wears corrective lenses, contacts or glasses to read and does not bring them with him/her to the study site.
- The participant has participated in any market research study, product label study or clinical trial in the past thirty (30) days.
- Non-English speakers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Syneron Medicallead
Study Sites (1)
Consumer Product Testing Company
Fairfield, New Jersey, 07004, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Doran Rozen, Director of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Syneron Beauty
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Caswell, Ph.D.
Consumer Product Testing Company
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2012
First Posted
April 16, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 25, 2013
Results First Posted
October 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11