Renal Artery Contrast-Free Trial
REACT
Comparison of Non-contrast Renal Artery Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Contrast-enhanced CT Angiography
1 other identifier
observational
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the results of a clinically ordered abdominal CT angiography to a research non-contrast MR angiogram (MRA). CTA is a "gold-standard" for identifying blockages in the kidney arteries or other blood vessel problems. CTA requires radiation and contrast to obtain useful images. Conversely, the MR abdomen technique being used for the study uses no radiation or contrast and is felt to be a safer option for individuals who have kidney problems. there is benefit to establishing non-contrast MRA as a clinically accurate test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2012
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedAugust 26, 2015
August 1, 2015
9 months
April 10, 2012
August 24, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of non-contrast renal MR angiography for assessment of renal artery stenosis (RAS)
Accuracy of renal T-SLIP for assessing RAS severity in comparison to abdominal CTA. CTA is being used as the gold standard for comparison
up to study closure, estimated 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Safety assessment of non-contrast renal artery imaging
may be followed on average up to 3 months after closure
Image quality
up to study closure, estimated 3 months
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who have had an abdominal CT for any reason will be considered for the REACT study. They may be referred from private practice or imaging center.
You may qualify if:
- The abdominal CTA evaluation form has been completed and confirmed to fit criteria for study enrollment
- The research MRA will be completed within 3 months of abdominal CTA
- Subject signed and dated the informed consent form
- Subject agrees to a "research" abdominal MRA
- Subject is able to follow breathing and scanning instructions
- Subject is at least 18 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has had a significant change in clinical condition between the time of abdominal CTA and abdominal MRA (e.g. worsening renal function, renal vascular intervention)
- Subject has renal stents, or other known material that may affect MR image quality
- Subject has a contraindication to an MRI
- Subject had intravenous gadolinium media within the previous 24 hours
- Subject has a baseline heart rate \>90 beats per minute or respiratory rate \>25 breaths/minute
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Central Coast Cardiolgy
Salinas, California, 93901, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy S. Albert, MD
Central Coast Cardiovascular Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Secretary
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2012
First Posted
April 13, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 26, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08