Irinotecan in Combination With Cisplatin in Pediatric Patients With Unfavorable Prognosis Gliomas
Phase II, Single Arm, Open Label Clinical Trial With Irinotecan in Combination With Cisplatin in Pediatric Patients With Unfavorable Prognosis Gliomas
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Tumours of the brain and of the central nervous system (CNS) are the most common solid tumours in children. Amongst these, gliomas are the most frequent, although this term covers different histological subtypes, the most frequent being astrocytoma. However, they are rare diseases of low prevalence. The interest in the cisplatin/irinotecan combination in brain tumours motivated a previous pilot study at our hospital, with encouraging results. This experience, together with the need for new strategies for high-risk pediatric gliomas has motivated the conduct of this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Nov 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 24, 2015
August 1, 2015
4.6 years
March 29, 2012
August 21, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety and objective response rate (ORR).
The primary objective is to determine the safety and objective response rate (ORR), defined according to the criteria given in the CPMP/EWP/205/95/Rev.3/Corr.2, of irinotecan + cisplatin in pediatric patients with gliomas, through clinical signs and MR. The primary variable is the ORR.
Clinical signs, AEs, SAEs, ARs, SARs, Imaging and Audiometry changes: from baseline to FUP month 12.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Duration of the response.
Clinical signs: baseline and every week (w1to21)+FUP month 3,6,9,12. Imaging (RM Baseline+w10&20+FUP month 3,6,9,12/PET: Baseline+w20).
Safety of the combined Irinotecan+Cisplatin therapy
Clinical signs, AEs, SAEs, ARs, SARs: baseline and every week (w1to21)+FUP month 3,6,9,12.Blood (hemo/chem):baseline&every week (w 1 to 21, except w10). Audiometry: baseline+w20+m6+m12.
Possible associations of gene MGMT promoter and microsatellites instability with reference to response to study treatment
Clinical signs: baseline and every week (w1to21)+FUP month 3,6,9,12. Imaging (RM Baseline+w10&20+FUP month 3,6,9,12/PET: Baseline+w20). Genomic study: baseline (week-14 to-9)
To assess the applicability and efficacy of volumetric measurements as a treatment tumor-response indicator.
Clinical signs: baseline (day-14to-9) and every week (w1to21)+FUP month 3,6,9,12. Imaging (RM Baseline day-14to -9 +w10&20+FUP month 3,6,9,12.
To assess the applicability and efficacy of metabolic study by PET-methionine
Clinical signs: baseline (day-14to-9) and every week (w1to21)+FUP month 3,6,9,12. PET: Baseline day-14to -9 + w20).
Study Arms (1)
Irinotecan plus Cisplatin combination
EXPERIMENTALThis is a open-label study with only one treatment experimental arm. The patients will be treated, in a weekly basis, with 30 mg/m2 of cisplatino plus 65 mg/m2 of irinotecán (one cycle), until a total of 16 cycles.
Interventions
Irinotecan and Cisplatin will be administered weekly ambulatory, intravenous (iv), until to reach a total of 16 cycles. Cisplatin is administered first and then Irinotecan. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2/d (iv) in one hour,followed by Irinotecan 65 mg/m2/d iv in one hour. There is a one-week rest period every 4 cycles. The total treatment length including 16 cycles + rest weeks is 19 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histological confirmation of neoplasia, except for intrinsic brain stem tumour and optic pathway glioma in one patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).
- Pertaining to one of the diagnostic groups: Cohort 1: Recently diagnosed high grade glioma. Cohort 2: Recurrent high grade glioma. Cohort 3: Intrinsic brain stem tumour. Cohort 4: High risk low grade glioma.
- Measurable primary or metastatic tumours with at least one 10 mm diameter lesion in two MR dimensions.
- Absence of prior treatment with cisplatin or irinotecan.
- Aged between 6 months to 18 years.
- Lansky/Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70% (Appendix 6.1). Neurological deficits secondary to the tumour should be stable before entering the trial.
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months.
- Adequate organic function, including haematological, renal and hepatic function.
- Wash-out period of at least 3 weeks after chemotherapy and 6 weeks after nitrosoureas or radiotherapy. Recovery from all toxic effects of previous treatments.
- Subjects of fertile age should use an effective birth control method throughout the entire study. Women of child-bearing age will be included after a negative pregnancy test result.
- Informed consent of the parents or legal representative, and informed consent of the mature minor.
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent administration of any other anti-cancer treatment.
- Pre-existing, non-controlled diarrhoea
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Treatment in another clinical trial.
- Serious concomitant disease that could compromise the completion of the trial. -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital Sant Joan de Deulead
- Fundació Sant Joan de Déucollaborator
- Spanish National Health Systemcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Sant Joan De Déu
Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08950, Spain
Related Publications (23)
Alonso M, Hamelin R, Kim M, Porwancher K, Sung T, Parhar P, Miller DC, Newcomb EW. Microsatellite instability occurs in distinct subtypes of pediatric but not adult central nervous system tumors. Cancer Res. 2001 Mar 1;61(5):2124-8.
PMID: 11280776BACKGROUNDBlaney S, Berg SL, Pratt C, Weitman S, Sullivan J, Luchtman-Jones L, Bernstein M. A phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients: a pediatric oncology group study. Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Jan;7(1):32-7.
PMID: 11205914BACKGROUNDBomgaars L, Berg SL, Blaney SM. The development of camptothecin analogs in childhood cancers. Oncologist. 2001;6(6):506-16. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.6-6-506.
PMID: 11743213BACKGROUNDBomgaars L, Kerr J, Berg S, Kuttesch J, Klenke R, Blaney SM. A phase I study of irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule in pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Jan;46(1):50-5. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20355.
PMID: 15768380BACKGROUNDBomgaars LR, Bernstein M, Krailo M, Kadota R, Das S, Chen Z, Adamson PC, Blaney SM. Phase II trial of irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4622-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6103.
PMID: 17925558BACKGROUNDBouffet E, Mottolese C, Jouvet A, Philip I, Frappaz D, Carrie C, Brunat-Mentigny M. Etoposide and thiotepa followed by ABMT (autologous bone marrow transplantation) in children and young adults with high-grade gliomas. Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jan;33(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00369-3.
PMID: 9071906BACKGROUNDBrat DJ, Shehata BM, Castellano-Sanchez AA, Hawkins C, Yost RB, Greco C, Mazewski C, Janss A, Ohgaki H, Perry A. Congenital glioblastoma: a clinicopathologic and genetic analysis. Brain Pathol. 2007 Jul;17(3):276-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00071.x. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
PMID: 17465990BACKGROUNDBroniscer A, Chintagumpala M, Fouladi M, Krasin MJ, Kocak M, Bowers DC, Iacono LC, Merchant TE, Stewart CF, Houghton PJ, Kun LE, Ledet D, Gajjar A. Temozolomide after radiotherapy for newly diagnosed high-grade glioma and unfavorable low-grade glioma in children. J Neurooncol. 2006 Feb;76(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-7409-5.
PMID: 16200343BACKGROUNDCoggins CA, Elion GB, Houghton PJ, Hare CB, Keir S, Colvin OM, Bigner DD, Friedman HS. Enhancement of irinotecan (CPT-11) activity against central nervous system tumor xenografts by alkylating agents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998;41(6):485-90. doi: 10.1007/s002800050771.
PMID: 9554593BACKGROUNDCosetti M, Wexler LH, Calleja E, Trippett T, LaQuaglia M, Huvos AG, Gerald W, Healey JH, Meyers PA, Gorlick R. Irinotecan for pediatric solid tumors: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002 Feb;24(2):101-5. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200202000-00009.
PMID: 11990694BACKGROUNDCrews KR, Stewart CF, Jones-Wallace D, Thompson SJ, Houghton PJ, Heideman RL, Fouladi M, Bowers DC, Chintagumpala MM, Gajjar A. Altered irinotecan pharmacokinetics in pediatric high-grade glioma patients receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Jul;8(7):2202-9.
PMID: 12114421BACKGROUNDDonson AM, Addo-Yobo SO, Handler MH, Gore L, Foreman NK. MGMT promoter methylation correlates with survival benefit and sensitivity to temozolomide in pediatric glioblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Apr;48(4):403-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20803.
PMID: 16609952BACKGROUNDEsteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E, Goodman SN, Hidalgo OF, Vanaclocha V, Baylin SB, Herman JG. Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 9;343(19):1350-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011093431901. Erratum In: N Engl J Med 2000 Dec 7;343(23):1740.
PMID: 11070098BACKGROUNDFallik D, Borrini F, Boige V, Viguier J, Jacob S, Miquel C, Sabourin JC, Ducreux M, Praz F. Microsatellite instability is a predictive factor of the tumor response to irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 15;63(18):5738-44.
PMID: 14522894BACKGROUNDFinlay JL, Geyer JR, Turski PA, Yates AJ, Boyett JM, Allen JC, Packer RJ. Pre-irradiation chemotherapy in children with high-grade astrocytoma: tumor response to two cycles of the '8-drugs-in-1-day' regimen. A Childrens Cancer Group study, CCG-945. J Neurooncol. 1994;21(3):255-65. doi: 10.1007/BF01063775.
PMID: 7699420BACKGROUNDFurman WL, Stewart CF, Poquette CA, Pratt CB, Santana VM, Zamboni WC, Bowman LC, Ma MK, Hoffer FA, Meyer WH, Pappo AS, Walter AW, Houghton PJ. Direct translation of a protracted irinotecan schedule from a xenograft model to a phase I trial in children. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1815-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1815.
PMID: 10561220BACKGROUNDGallia GL, Rand V, Siu IM, Eberhart CG, James CD, Marie SK, Oba-Shinjo SM, Carlotti CG, Caballero OL, Simpson AJ, Brock MV, Massion PP, Carson BS Sr, Riggins GJ. PIK3CA gene mutations in pediatric and adult glioblastoma multiforme. Mol Cancer Res. 2006 Oct;4(10):709-14. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0172.
PMID: 17050665BACKGROUNDGilbertson RJ, Hill DA, Hernan R, Kocak M, Geyer R, Olson J, Gajjar A, Rush L, Hamilton RL, Finkelstein SD, Pollack IF. ERBB1 is amplified and overexpressed in high-grade diffusely infiltrative pediatric brain stem glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 1;9(10 Pt 1):3620-4.
PMID: 14506149BACKGROUNDGnekow AK, Kortmann RD, Pietsch T, Emser A. Low grade chiasmatic-hypothalamic glioma-carboplatin and vincristin chemotherapy effectively defers radiotherapy within a comprehensive treatment strategy -- report from the multicenter treatment study for children and adolescents with a low grade glioma -- HIT-LGG 1996 -- of the Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH). Klin Padiatr. 2004 Nov-Dec;216(6):331-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832355.
PMID: 15565548BACKGROUNDGrill J, Couanet D, Cappelli C, Habrand JL, Rodriguez D, Sainte-Rose C, Kalifa C. Radiation-induced cerebral vasculopathy in children with neurofibromatosis and optic pathway glioma. Ann Neurol. 1999 Mar;45(3):393-6. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:33.0.co;2-b.
PMID: 10072056BACKGROUNDGrovas AC, Boyett JM, Lindsley K, Rosenblum M, Yates AJ, Finlay JL. Regimen-related toxicity of myeloablative chemotherapy with BCNU, thiotepa, and etoposide followed by autologous stem cell rescue for children with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: report from the Children's Cancer Group. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999 Aug;33(2):83-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(199908)33:23.0.co;2-g.
PMID: 10398181BACKGROUNDHegi ME, Diserens AC, Godard S, Dietrich PY, Regli L, Ostermann S, Otten P, Van Melle G, de Tribolet N, Stupp R. Clinical trial substantiates the predictive value of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Mar 15;10(6):1871-4. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0384.
PMID: 15041700BACKGROUNDHertzberg RP, Caranfa MJ, Holden KG, Jakas DR, Gallagher G, Mattern MR, Mong SM, Bartus JO, Johnson RK, Kingsbury WD. Modification of the hydroxy lactone ring of camptothecin: inhibition of mammalian topoisomerase I and biological activity. J Med Chem. 1989 Mar;32(3):715-20. doi: 10.1021/jm00123a038.
PMID: 2537428BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
OFELIA CRUZ, MD, PhD
HOSPITAL DE SANT JOAN DE DÈU
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2012
First Posted
April 10, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08