A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Rapid Induction of Cooling in Stroke Patients, Cold Infusions vs. RhinoChill (iCOOL 1)
iCOOL 1
iCOOL 1 (Induction of COOLing 1): A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Rapid Induction of Cooling in Stroke Patients, Cold Infusions vs. RhinoChill
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mild hypothermia improves outcome in patients with global cerebral ischemia after cardiac arrest. Hypothermia seems promising also in other acute hypoxic-ischemic or in brain swelling associated cerebrovascular disease. The narrow-time-frame is a major issue ("time is brain"). To provide immediate cooling without delay, easy to use, mobile and effective methods are needed. Cold infusions (4 °C) are an accepted standard worldwide. The RhinoChill (BeneChill, USA) is a new device. A comparison of these two induction methods has never been done before. Neither was the effect of cold infusions on brain-temperature measured. For the first time iCOOL 1 compares feasibility, safety and efficacy of the two methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2012
CompletedApril 26, 2012
April 1, 2012
1.2 years
March 31, 2012
April 25, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Brain temperature
Primary endpoint: Change of brain temperature during one hour after start of cooling. Repeated measurement ANOVA for within subject contrasts (phase 1 (0 to 15min), 2 (15 to 30min), 3 (30 to 45min) and 4 (45 to 60min)) vs. baseline (-15 to 0min)
-15 to +60min
Secondary Outcomes (3)
(Neuro-)vital parameters
-15 to +60 min
Cerebral autoregulation
-15 to +60 min
Safety
0-6 months
Study Arms (2)
Cold infusions
ACTIVE COMPARATORInfusion of 2L cold crystalloid solution (4°C) over 30 minutes
RhinoChill
ACTIVE COMPARATORNasopharyngeal cooling with the RhinoChill device (BeneChill, USA)
Interventions
Nasopharyngeal cooling with the RhinoChill device
Infusion of 2L cold crystalloid solution (4°C) over 30 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Sedation, intubation and mechanical ventilation
- Combined ICP-temperature-probe
- Indication to lower body temperature
- Age ≥ 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Body weight \> 120 kg
- Fever \> 38.5°C
- Chronic sinusitis
- Current or past fracture or surgery of the paranasal sinuses
- Severe infection with bacteremia or sepsis ≤ 72 h
- Severe renal insufficiency
- Severe liver insufficiency
- Acute pulmonary embolism
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Severe cardiac insufficiency (NYHA ≥ III)
- Threatening ventricular dysrhythmia
- Cardiac dysrhythmia with bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 /min, QTc \> 450 ms, sick sinus syndrome, AV-block II-III°).
- Known hematologic disease with increased risk of thrombosis (e.g. cryoglobulinemia, cold agglutinins, sickle cell anemia)
- Known vasospastic vascular disorder (e.g. Raynaud's phenomenon or thromboangiitis obliterans)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Neuro Intensive Care Unit 2, Dept. of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Poli S, Purrucker J, Priglinger M, Ebner M, Sykora M, Diedler J, Bulut C, Popp E, Rupp A, Hametner C. Rapid Induction of COOLing in Stroke Patients (iCOOL1): a randomised pilot study comparing cold infusions with nasopharyngeal cooling. Crit Care. 2014 Oct 27;18(5):582. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0582-1.
PMID: 25346332DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sven Poli, Dr. med.
University Hospital Heidelberg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Neurologist, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2012
First Posted
April 6, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 26, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-04