Dobutamine Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Echocardiography for the Assessment of Outcome. Are the Two Imaging Modalities Comparable?
1 other identifier
observational
5,008
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (DCMR) are both established non-invasive techniques, used in the clinical routine for the diagnostic classification and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). In this regard, regional wall motion abnormalities (WMA) during dobutamine stress, precede the development of ST-segment depression and anginal symptoms, enabling the detection of anatomically significant CAD and the assessment of clinical outcomes. In a head-to-head comparison between the 2 techniques, favourable diagnostic characteristics in terms of higher sensitivity and accuracy were noted for DCMR compared to DSE. Although it has been reported that stress induced WMA both in DCMR and in DSE are independent predictors for hard cardiac events such as cardiac death or myocardial infarction, the value of the 2 techniques for the risk stratification of patients with CAD has not been compared to each other so far. Comparison of these 2 non-invasive techniques is important, because referring physicians need to know which modality is more reliable for the identification of patients at higher risk for subsequent cardiac events, who would benefit from early invasive therapy. In the investigators study the investigators therefore sought to compare the ability of DSE versus DCMR to predict subsequent hard cardiac events and revascularization procedures in a patient cohort with high CAD prevalence. Their predictive value was compared to that of conventional atherogenic risk factors and to resting WMA. In addition, the investigators sought to determine if both techniques are equally suitable for structuring invasive or conservative treatment according to the presence or absence of inducible ischemia, respectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2001
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2001
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2012
CompletedApril 2, 2012
March 1, 2012
11 years
March 29, 2012
March 30, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MACEs)
4-6 years of follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Late revascularization (90 days after the MR-examination)
4-6 years
Study Arms (2)
DSE
Patients, who underwent Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography (DSE)
DSCMR
Patients, who underwent Dobutamine Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (DSCMR)
Eligibility Criteria
Consecutive patients referred to our institution for clinically indicated dobutamine stress testing (either DSCMR or DSE) due to suspected or known CAD(with/without prior revascularization and with/without history of previous myocardial infarction).
You may qualify if:
- written informed consent before the DSE or DSCMR-examination
You may not qualify if:
- unstable angina
- severe arterial hypertension (\>200/120mmHg)
- moderate or severe valvular disease
- general contraindications to dobutamine stress echocardiography:poor echogenic windows limiting endocardial border detection in ≥2 myocardial segments
- general contraindications to dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance: implanted pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillator, claustrophobia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Heidelberg, Department of Cardiology
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof Dr. med Grigorios Korosoglou, University of Heidelberg, Department of Cardiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2012
First Posted
April 2, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2001
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 2, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03