Study Stopped
The unexpected increase in morbidity of the hemoclip group
The Use of Prophylactic Hemoclips in the Endoscopic Resection of Large Pedunculated Polyps
Is the Use of Prophylactic Hemoclips in the Endoscopic Resection of Large Pedunculated Polyps Useful? A Prospective and Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of our study is to analyze the advantages of the prophylactic use of hemoclips before polypectomy in our usual clinical practice, through a prospective randomized study that determines their effectiveness compared to conventional polypectomy, assessing the decrease in immediate and delayed post-polypectomy bleeding
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 25, 2012
CompletedMay 25, 2012
April 1, 2012
3.1 years
March 27, 2012
March 28, 2012
April 25, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Number of Polyps With Complications After Polypectomy (The Total Complication Rate)
In order to test the ability of prophylactic hemoclipping to prevent post-polypectomy bleeding, the investigators were required to register all the adverse events that occurred. These adverse events were called "complications", despite their severity and clinical significance
Between four and six weeks after the polypectomy, the patients were contacted by phone in order to confirm the absence of delayed bleeding
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difficult to Place the Clip
During endoscopic procedure was performed (between 2007 and 2010: period over which the study was conducted)
Study Arms (2)
Hemoclip
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn group HEMOCLIP, one or more clips were placed (based on the criteria of the endoscopist in accordance with the size of the pedicle), and the polyp was subsequently resected using a diathermy loop
Conventional Polipectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn group CONVENTIONAL POLYPECTOMY, a conventional polypectomy was performed, which was not aided beforehand by any other hemostatic technique
Interventions
A rotatable clip-fixing device "Quickclip 2" standard was used (Olympus Medical Systems Corp. Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan), with an opening diameter of 135º and a maximum insertion portion diameter of 2.6 mm
Disposable electrosurgical snares (Olympus Medical Systems Corp. Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan) and an electrosurgery unit ERBE (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Germany) were used for polyp resection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with one or more pedunculated polyps, the heads of which measured more than 1cm (regardless of the stalk thickness and length), and they were compared against the size of the biopsy forceps (6mm) and subsequently confirmed in the anatomical specimen
- Not to have any hemostatic alterations at the time the endoscopy was performed (confirmed by the usual blood tests taken before the procedure).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 18 years of age
- Patients with a platelet count of less than 50000, INR larger than 1.5
- Patients who refused to give their informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
Leganés, Madrid, 28911, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Quintanilla E, Castro JL, Rabago LR, Chico I, Olivares A, Ortega A, Vicente C, Carbo J, Gea F. Is the use of prophylactic hemoclips in the endoscopic resection of large pedunculated polyps useful? A prospective and randomized study. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;2(4):183-188. doi: 10.4161/jig.23741. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
PMID: 23687606DERIVEDQuintanilla E, Castro JL, Rabago LR, Chico I, Olivares A, Ortega A, Vicente C, Carbo J, Gea F. Is the use of prophylactic hemoclips in the endoscopic resection of large pedunculated polyps useful? A prospective and randomized study. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;2(2):99-104. doi: 10.4161/jig.22210. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
PMID: 23687598DERIVED
Limitations and Caveats
Not to reach the sample size established previously in the initial design, implies bias and decreases the strength of the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dra Elvira Quintanilla
- Organization
- Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elvira M Quintanilla, MD
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Luis R Rábago, PhD
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2012
First Posted
March 29, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
August 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 25, 2012
Results First Posted
May 25, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-04