NCT01565993

Brief Summary

The aim of our study is to analyze the advantages of the prophylactic use of hemoclips before polypectomy in our usual clinical practice, through a prospective randomized study that determines their effectiveness compared to conventional polypectomy, assessing the decrease in immediate and delayed post-polypectomy bleeding

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
108

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2007

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2007

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2010

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 25, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 25, 2012

Status Verified

April 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

March 27, 2012

Results QC Date

March 28, 2012

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2012

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Number of Polyps With Complications After Polypectomy (The Total Complication Rate)

    In order to test the ability of prophylactic hemoclipping to prevent post-polypectomy bleeding, the investigators were required to register all the adverse events that occurred. These adverse events were called "complications", despite their severity and clinical significance

    Between four and six weeks after the polypectomy, the patients were contacted by phone in order to confirm the absence of delayed bleeding

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Difficult to Place the Clip

    During endoscopic procedure was performed (between 2007 and 2010: period over which the study was conducted)

Study Arms (2)

Hemoclip

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In group HEMOCLIP, one or more clips were placed (based on the criteria of the endoscopist in accordance with the size of the pedicle), and the polyp was subsequently resected using a diathermy loop

Device: Hemoclip

Conventional Polipectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In group CONVENTIONAL POLYPECTOMY, a conventional polypectomy was performed, which was not aided beforehand by any other hemostatic technique

Device: Conventional Polipectomy

Interventions

HemoclipDEVICE

A rotatable clip-fixing device "Quickclip 2" standard was used (Olympus Medical Systems Corp. Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan), with an opening diameter of 135º and a maximum insertion portion diameter of 2.6 mm

Hemoclip

Disposable electrosurgical snares (Olympus Medical Systems Corp. Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan) and an electrosurgery unit ERBE (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Germany) were used for polyp resection

Conventional Polipectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with one or more pedunculated polyps, the heads of which measured more than 1cm (regardless of the stalk thickness and length), and they were compared against the size of the biopsy forceps (6mm) and subsequently confirmed in the anatomical specimen
  • Not to have any hemostatic alterations at the time the endoscopy was performed (confirmed by the usual blood tests taken before the procedure).

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18 years of age
  • Patients with a platelet count of less than 50000, INR larger than 1.5
  • Patients who refused to give their informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa

Leganés, Madrid, 28911, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Quintanilla E, Castro JL, Rabago LR, Chico I, Olivares A, Ortega A, Vicente C, Carbo J, Gea F. Is the use of prophylactic hemoclips in the endoscopic resection of large pedunculated polyps useful? A prospective and randomized study. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;2(4):183-188. doi: 10.4161/jig.23741. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

  • Quintanilla E, Castro JL, Rabago LR, Chico I, Olivares A, Ortega A, Vicente C, Carbo J, Gea F. Is the use of prophylactic hemoclips in the endoscopic resection of large pedunculated polyps useful? A prospective and randomized study. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;2(2):99-104. doi: 10.4161/jig.22210. Epub 2012 Apr 1.

Limitations and Caveats

Not to reach the sample size established previously in the initial design, implies bias and decreases the strength of the study.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dra Elvira Quintanilla
Organization
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa

Study Officials

  • Elvira M Quintanilla, MD

    Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Luis R Rábago, PhD

    Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2012

First Posted

March 29, 2012

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Primary Completion

August 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2010

Last Updated

May 25, 2012

Results First Posted

May 25, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-04

Locations