Effects of Bolus and Continuous Nasogastric Feeding on Small Bowel Water Content and Blood Flow
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Following surgery some patients are unable to swallow. For those requiring nutritional support a tube is sometimes passed through the nose into the stomach to provide feeding. Traditionally this type of feeding is given slowly over the course of the day. However, it is thought that this mode of feeding might increase the amount of fluid entering the bowel contributing to symptoms of diarrhoea. An alternative strategy of feeding, given in larger volumes in a shorter space of time resembles normal feeding patterns and may reduce the amount of water entering the bowel. In this study we want to use a non invasive medical imaging technique called "magnetic resonance imaging" (or MRI) to look at the volume of bowel water following these two feeding strategies in 12 healthy volunteers. Each volunteer will have a tube inserted into the stomach via the nose and undergo the two feeding strategies at least 7 days apart. We will take repeated images using the MRI scanner to assess the bowel response and some samples of blood are required for analysis of blood sugar.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Jan 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedMay 6, 2013
May 1, 2013
11 months
March 12, 2012
May 3, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Small bowel water volume (ml)
Small bowel water content assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
0-240 min
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Gastric emptying
0-240 min
Superior mesenteric artery blood flow
0-240 min
Peptide YY
0-240 min
Insulin
0-240 min
Glucose
0-240 min
Study Arms (2)
NG bolus feeding over 5 min
ACTIVE COMPARATORTube bolus (TB): feed administered via syringe through NG tube over 5 min.
Continuous NG feeding over 4 h
PLACEBO COMPARATORContinuous tube drip feeding (TD): feed pump delivered via the NG tube over 4 h.
Interventions
Tube bolus (TB): 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., administered via the NG tube over 5 min.
Continuous tube drip feeding (TD): 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., delivered via feeding pump through the NG tube over 4 h.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy
- Male
- Able to undergo safe magnetic resonance scanning
You may not qualify if:
- Female
- Chronic medical conditions
- Regular medication
- Unable to undergo safe magentic resonance scanning
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Smoking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Centre
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (9)
Dempsey DT, Mullen JL, Buzby GP. The link between nutritional status and clinical outcome: can nutritional intervention modify it? Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Feb;47(2 Suppl):352-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/47.2.352.
PMID: 3124596BACKGROUNDStroud M, Duncan H, Nightingale J; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut. 2003 Dec;52 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):vii1-vii12. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.suppl_7.vii1. No abstract available.
PMID: 14612488BACKGROUNDKeohane PP, Attrill H, Love M, Frost P, Silk DB. Relation between osmolality of diet and gastrointestinal side effects in enteral nutrition. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 3;288(6418):678-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6418.678.
PMID: 6421429BACKGROUNDKocan MJ, Hickisch SM. A comparison of continuous and intermittent enteral nutrition in NICU patients. J Neurosci Nurs. 1986 Dec;18(6):333-7. doi: 10.1097/01376517-198612000-00004.
PMID: 2949027BACKGROUNDSarap AN, Sarap MD, Childers J. Small bowel necrosis in association with jejunal tube feeding. JAAPA. 2010 Nov;23(11):28, 30-2. doi: 10.1097/01720610-201011000-00006.
PMID: 21086887BACKGROUNDMelis M, Fichera A, Ferguson MK. Bowel necrosis associated with early jejunal tube feeding: A complication of postoperative enteral nutrition. Arch Surg. 2006 Jul;141(7):701-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.7.701.
PMID: 16847244BACKGROUNDLobo DN, Hendry PO, Rodrigues G, Marciani L, Totman JJ, Wright JW, Preston T, Gowland P, Spiller RC, Fearon KC. Gastric emptying of three liquid oral preoperative metabolic preconditioning regimens measured by magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adult volunteers: a randomised double-blind, crossover study. Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;28(6):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
PMID: 19500889BACKGROUNDHoad CL, Marciani L, Foley S, Totman JJ, Wright J, Bush D, Cox EF, Campbell E, Spiller RC, Gowland PA. Non-invasive quantification of small bowel water content by MRI: a validation study. Phys Med Biol. 2007 Dec 7;52(23):6909-22. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/23/009. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
PMID: 18029983BACKGROUNDMarciani L, Cox EF, Hoad CL, Pritchard S, Totman JJ, Foley S, Mistry A, Evans S, Gowland PA, Spiller RC. Postprandial changes in small bowel water content in healthy subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2010 Feb;138(2):469-77, 477.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.10.055. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
PMID: 19909743BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abeed H Chowdhury, BSc MRCS
University of Nottingham
- STUDY CHAIR
Tim Bowling, MD FRCP
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2012
First Posted
March 19, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 6, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05