A Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Nerve Block Ropivacaine Concentrations
A Comparison of 0.1 and 0.2% Ropivacaine in Lumbar Plexus Catheters After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparison of Postoperative Analgesia and Motor Function.
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Peripheral nerve blocks are the standard of care for pain management after hip replacement surgery at UPMC Shadyside. This prospective, randomized study is intended to assess the effect of 0.1 versus 0.2% ropivacaine in lumbar plexus nerve catheter infusions after total hip arthroplasty. Ropivacaine peripheral nerve block infusions have been utilized as the standard of care at UPMC Shadyside for many years. Ropivacaine, a less potent left-isomer of bupivacaine, is often used in place of bupivacaine due to less motor blockade and less severe cardiovascular and central nervous system potential toxicity. The primary goal of this study to examine the effect of a low concentration infusion of ropivacaine (0.1%) on postoperative analgesia (evaluated by opioid consumption after 36 hours) compared with the standard accepted concentration of 0.2% ropivacaine in lumbar plexus catheters after primary total hip arthroplasty. Secondary goals are to examine motor function, VAS scores and patient satisfaction with pain control in low concentration 0.1% ropivacaine compared with 0.2% ropivacaine lumbar plexus infusions upto 36 hours after primary total hip arthroplasty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 25, 2016
CompletedJanuary 17, 2018
December 1, 2017
1.3 years
March 6, 2012
March 23, 2016
December 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Opiate Consumption Postoperatively
Postoperative opiate consumption at 24 hours
24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Patient Satisfaction With Pain Control
24 hours postoperatively
Numeric Rating Scale Pain Score With Movement at 24 Hours
24 hours postoperatively
Number of Participants With Increased Infusion Rates
Subjects will be followed postoperatively until postoperative day 2 (i.e. the discontinuation of the lumbar plexus catheters)
Number of Participants With Decreased Infusion Rates
Subjects will be followed postoperatively until postoperative day 2 (i.e. the discontinuation of the lumbar plexus catheters)
Study Arms (2)
0.2% ropivacaine nerve block (standard of care)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.2% ropivacaine in lumbar plexus nerve catheter infusions for postoperative analgesia
0.1% ropivacaine infusion in nerve block catheter
EXPERIMENTAL0.1% ropivacaine in lumbar plexus nerve catheter infusions
Interventions
Either 0.1% or 0.2% ropivacaine will be infused at 7 mL/hr through lumbar plexus nerve block catheter based upon randomization, and can then receive a 6 ml bolus of either 0.1% or 0.2% ropivacaine. Additional pain relief will be available by nurse administered boluses of additional local anesthetic (from their randomized infusion) with a maximum dose of an extra 3 ml per bolus and limited to one bolus per hour. This bolus of their randomized local anesthetic will remain available until the nerve catheters are removed. Nerve block infusion rates may be increased to 9 ml/h for patients with increased pain without increased motor blockade as determined by the acute interventional perioperative pain service (AIPPS) or decreased to 5 ml/h for patients with increased motor blockade or weakness from the peripheral nerve block as determined by the AIPPS .All continuous lumbar plexus catheters will be removed on post operative day (POD) 2.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-75 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score I-III
- Scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty at UPMC Shadyside Hospital in Pittsburgh, PA.
- No contraindications to peripheral nerve catheter placement
- Patients not expected to receive therapeutic anticoagulation in the postoperative period.
- No known drug allergies to study medications
- Patients willing to receive spinal anesthesia as operative anesthetic
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years or older than 75 years.
- Any contraindication to a placement of continuous lumbar plexus peripheral nerve catheter.
- American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status IV or greater.
- Chronic painful conditions.
- Preoperative opioid tolerant use (opioid use for greater than 6 contiguous months before surgery).
- Coagulation abnormalities or patients who are expected to be on therapeutic anticoagulants postoperatively.
- Allergy to any of the drugs/agents used study protocol.
- Pregnancy
- Having an altered mental status (not oriented to place, person, or time)
- Any comorbid condition that, in the judgment of the consulting orthopedic surgeon or intraoperative anesthesiologist, would proscribe the patient from any aspect of the study.
- Patient refusal.
- Patient requiring postoperative management in the ICU
- Lumbar plexus catheter placed by loss of resistance technique.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sylvia Wilsonlead
Study Sites (1)
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Related Publications (6)
Siddiqui ZI, Cepeda MS, Denman W, Schumann R, Carr DB. Continuous lumbar plexus block provides improved analgesia with fewer side effects compared with systemic opioids after hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.008.
PMID: 17961837BACKGROUNDMarino J, Russo J, Kenny M, Herenstein R, Livote E, Chelly JE. Continuous lumbar plexus block for postoperative pain control after total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):29-37. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00079.
PMID: 19122076BACKGROUNDZink W, Graf BM. Local anesthetic myotoxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;29(4):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.02.008.
PMID: 15305253BACKGROUNDLeone S, Di Cianni S, Casati A, Fanelli G. Pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical use of new long acting local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Acta Biomed. 2008 Aug;79(2):92-105.
PMID: 18788503BACKGROUNDPaauwe JJ, Thomassen BJ, Weterings J, van Rossum E, Ausems ME. Femoral nerve block using ropivacaine 0.025%, 0.05% and 0.1%: effects on the rehabilitation programme following total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):948-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05538.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PMID: 18540926BACKGROUNDde Leeuw MA, Dertinger JA, Hulshoff L, Hoeksema M, Perez RS, Zuurmond WW, de Lange JJ. The efficacy of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine for combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):241-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00209.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
PMID: 18503623BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Susan Sandusky
- Organization
- University of Pittsburgh
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sylvia Wilson, MD
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
- STUDY CHAIR
Jacques E Chelly, MD, PhD, MBA
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Regional Anesthesia Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2012
First Posted
March 16, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 17, 2018
Results First Posted
April 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-12