Comparative Study of the Magnetically Guided Capsule Endoscopy Versus High Definition Gastroscopy
"EVALUATION CLINIQUE D'UNE CAPSULE A GUIDAGE MAGNETIQUE POUR L'EXPLORATION GASTRIQUE "Capsule Dirigée Versus Gastroscopie à Haute Définition""
1 other identifier
interventional
189
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A capsule steered by magnetic field force developed by Siemens and Olympus has recently been evaluated in a pilot series in man with encouraging results (Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Pangtay I, Hibi T, Kudo S, Tajiri H. Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope. Endoscopy. 2010;42:541-5. Epub 2010 Jun 30.18). This blinded prospective study investigates the accuracy of the magnetically guided capsule (MGCE) compared to gastroscopy in patients with focal lesions and / or gastric symptoms and indication for upper GI Endoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedJune 18, 2019
June 1, 2019
6 months
March 7, 2012
June 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy (MGCE) as compared to unblinded gastroscopy in the diagnosis of focal lesions.
To evaluate the accuracy of MGCE, which is performed by the first examiner. After the MGCE examination, conventional gastroscopy is performed by the second examiner and then the results of the two studies are compared.
2 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Accuracy of capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of diffuse and minor lesions
2 days
Examination times of capsule and conventional gastroscopy
1 hour
Patient acceptance of capsule gastroscopy and conventional gastroscopy
2 days
Adverse events of both procedures
14 days
Study Arms (1)
patients requiring upper GI endoscopy
OTHERpatients with upper abdominal complaints requiring upper GI endoscopy
Interventions
"a) MGCE capsule The MGCE capsule is custom-made for observation of the stomach. It is 31 mm in length and 11 mm in diameter and equipped with two image sensors. It contains a permanent magnet to enable magnetic guidance in the stomach by magnetic field." "b) Guidance system The magnet guidance system is custom-made to guide the MGCE capsule inside the stomach. It has a footprint of 1m× 2m and generates a very low level magnetic fields." c) Conventional gastroscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with gastric focal lesions (Group A)
- Patients with gastric symptoms and indicated for Upper GI endoscopy (Group B)
- Age of 18 years to 75 years"
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with dysphagia or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction
- Patients with suspected or known intestinal stenoses
- Overt GI bleeding
- Known large and obstructing tumors of the upper GI tract
- Patients after upper GI surgery or abdominal surgery altering GI anatomy
- Patients under full anticoagulation
- Patient in poor general condition (ASA III/IV)
- Patients with claustrophobia
- Patients using equipment that may be affected by radio transmission
- Patients using equipment that may be affected by magnetic field
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy "
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorflead
- Institute Arnault Tzanck, Francecollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nicecollaborator
- Keio Universitycollaborator
- Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Japancollaborator
- The Jikei University School of Medicine, Japancollaborator
- Olympus Corporationcollaborator
- Siemens AGcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institut Arnault Tzanck , Avenue du Docteur Maurice Donat
Saint-Laurent-du-Var, Cote Azur, 06721, France
Related Publications (3)
Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Pangtay I, Hibi T, Kudo SE, Tajiri H. Blinded nonrandomized comparative study of gastric examination with a magnetically guided capsule endoscope and standard videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):373-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.030. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
PMID: 22154417BACKGROUNDRey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Pangtay I, Hibi T, Kudo S, Tajiri H. Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope. Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):541-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255521. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
PMID: 20593331BACKGROUNDDenzer UW, Rosch T, Hoytat B, Abdel-Hamid M, Hebuterne X, Vanbiervielt G, Filippi J, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Kudo SE, Tajiri H, Treszl A, Wegscheider K, Greff M, Rey JF. Magnetically guided capsule versus conventional gastroscopy for upper abdominal complaints: a prospective blinded study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;49(2):101-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110.
PMID: 24618504RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
J F Rey, MD
Institut Arnault Tzanck, St. Laurent du Var, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2012
First Posted
March 15, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06