Comparing Bowel Preparation Regimens for Flexible Sigmoidoscopy
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing PicoSalax, Versus PicoSalax and Fleet Enema Versus Fleet Enema Alone for Sigmoidoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Objective and Hypothesis: The investigators objective is to help determine the efficacy of oral and rectal bowel preparation regimens for sigmoidoscopy. The investigators hypothesis is that oral preparation will reduce the amount of repeat rectal enemas required and improve the quality of a bowel exam at the sigmoidoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 25, 2015
September 1, 2015
3.5 years
March 1, 2012
September 23, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of colon cleansing
The primary outcomes for this trial will be the quality of colon cleansing in the area of the colon examined. We will use a modified Ottawa bowel preparation scoring system measured at the time of endoscopy
At the time of the flexible sigmoidoscopy, therefore, within 24 hours of flexible sigmoidoscopy
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Patient tolerance questionnaire
At the time of the flexible sigmoidoscopy, therefore, within 24 hours of flexible sigmoidoscopy
Requirement for an additional rectal enema.
At the time of the flexible sigmoidoscopy, therefore, within 24 hours of flexible sigmoidoscopy
Maximum length of scope inserted
At the time of the flexible sigmoidoscopy, therefore, within 24 hours of flexible sigmoidoscopy
Reason for discontinuing further advancement of the scope
At the time of the flexible sigmoidoscopy, therefore, within 24 hours of flexible sigmoidoscopy
Study Arms (3)
Picosalax with rectal enema
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm will receive one satchet of Picosalx and a rectal enema before the sigmoidoscopy for their bowel preparation regimen.
rectal enema
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of patients will receive only a rectal enema for bowel preparation before their flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Pico-Salax
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatient will take one sachet of pico-salax
Interventions
One sachet of picosalax will be given with at least 4 cups of clear fluids.
The patient will have an enema inserted into the rectum and the liquid contents of the enema will be squeezed into the rectum. The patient will need to hold in the enema for several minutes then can release it.
Pt will take one sachet of Pico-salax the evening prior to procedure and fleet enema 1 hour before leaving home on the morning of the procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- previous colorectal surgery and patients with reduced renal function or other medical conditions that would increase the risk of receiving oral PicoSalx would be excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada
Hotel Dieu Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5G2, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lawrence Hookey, MD
Queen's University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samson K. Haimanot, MD
Queen's University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Queen's University, Department of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2012
First Posted
March 14, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 25, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09