Impact of the Preservation of the Gastric Antrum in the Technique of Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of the Morbid Obesity
QUALISLEEVE
2 other identifiers
interventional
346
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The bariatric surgery is recognized, at present, as the only effective therapeutic for the patients with morbid obesity. Two surgical procedures (said restrictive) are considered as consensual: the adjustable calibrated horizontal gastroplasty under laparoscopy (ring périgastric) and Gastric Bypass under laparoscopy (LGBP). The longitudinal gastrectomy (sleeve gastrectomy) is a technique of bariatric surgery recently validated (HAS on 2008). It consists of the realization of a partial gastrectomy of 2/3 (Fundus, gastric Body +/- antrum). However, lot of technical disagreements are brought back by expert teams. The most important disagreement concerns the conservation or the exeresis of the gastric antrum. In fact, the conservation of gastric antrum could facilitate the gastric emptying and to decrease the RGO (main complication) and act on the regulations of hormones modulators of the insulino-secretion. A prospective,randomized study comparing these both techniques is necessary to determine a unique consensual technique
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 17, 2019
CompletedJanuary 10, 2020
January 1, 2020
5.5 years
February 27, 2012
January 7, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the frequency appearance of RGO after surgery intervention (between two techniques longitudinal gastrectomy) in patients of morbid obesity
The main objective of this study is to compare the frequency of post-operative gastronomic appearance of gastroesophagal reflux(RGO) between both techniques of longitudinal gastrectomy under laparoscopy (gastrectomy coupling sleeve with antrum conservation or without antrum conservation) at patients with morbid obesity.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Assessment of efficiency on loss of weight and global post-operative morbidity between both surgery techniques.
12 months
Impact assessment of both types' surgery on the comorbidity and treatments of obesity
12 months
Assessment of gastrinemia between both groups (efficacy assessment)
at 1,3,12 months
Study Arms (2)
bariatric surgery 1
OTHERLongitudinal gastrectomy (sleeve gastrectomy) is a technique of bariatric surgery. In this arm, patients have a bariatric surgery with conservation of gastric antrum.
bariatric surgery 2
EXPERIMENTALLongitudinal gastrectomy (sleeve gastrectomy) is a technique of bariatric surgery. In this arm, patients have a bariatric surgery with ablation of gastric antrum.
Interventions
The longitudinal gastrectomy (sleeve gastrectomy) is a technique of bariatric surgery recently validated (HAS on 2008).It consists of the realization of a partial gastrectomy of 2/3 (Fundus, gastric Body +/- antrum). However, lot of technical disagreements are brought back by expert teams. The most important disagreement concerns the conservation or the exeresis of the gastric antrum. In fact, the conservation of gastric antrum could facilitate the gastric emptying and to decrease the RGO (main complication) and act on the regulations of hormones modulators of the insulino-secretion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with an indication of bariatric surgery (Recommendations HAS) defined as follows:
- IMC = 40kg/m² with failure of the dietary treatments during at least 1 year, or
- IMC = 35kg/m ² if associated comorbidity (HTA, diabetes, gonarthrose, sleep apnea, dyslipidemia, severe respiratory diseases)
- Patients motivated by this surgery and to accept the post-operative constraints.
- Age: \> 18 years and \< 65 years.
- patient having received an favorable opinion to the multidisciplinary meeting
- patient with his/her consent.
- patient with French insurance
You may not qualify if:
- Women Patients presenting a current pregnancy (not effective contraception during the first year after surgery) or in age to procreate and without means of effective contraception (oestroprogestational)
- patient with a contraindication to the anesthesia
- patient with grave psychiatric disorders (psychotic, paranoid)
- Emotionally unstable Patient or showing psychiatric characteristics which according to the opinion of the psychologist or the surgeon are incompatible with this type of surgery
- patient with surgical histories esogastric
- Patient with an inflammation of the digestive system (severe esophagitis, gastrointestinal ulcer, CROHN disease)
- Patient with a severe cardiopulmonary affection or other severe organic affection
- patient with a risk of bleedings in the superior gastrointestinal part (esophageal varice)
- Patient with gastrointestinal congenital defects (stenosis, atresia)
- Patient with chronic alcoholism or drug addiction
- patient having a serious infection (HIV)
- Patient who refuses categorically the diet imposed by this surgery
- patient with a food of type "sweet eaters" (sweet food, high calorie liquid).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Montpellierlead
- University Hospital, Marseillecollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nicecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
CHRU Montpellier, Hopital Saint-Eloi
Montpellier, 34295, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nocca David, PU-PH
CHRU de Montpellier
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2012
First Posted
March 12, 2012
Study Start
September 30, 2011
Primary Completion
March 28, 2017
Study Completion
May 17, 2019
Last Updated
January 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01