Retrospective Record Review of Adults and Children Advised for Allergen Immunotherapy (MK-7243-022)
Evaluation of Patient Initiation and Persistence With Advised Allergen Immunotherapy
1 other identifier
observational
8,790
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of participants that initiate allergen immunotherapy (AIT) upon the recommendation of their physician and the proportion of participants that persist with their AIT throughout the recommended course.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 6, 2014
CompletedMarch 3, 2017
January 1, 2017
6 months
March 6, 2012
January 23, 2014
January 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Drops
The percentage of participants who were advised by their physician to start AIT and elected to initiate AIT was calculated. AIT initiation was broken down by type of AIT initiated (SCIT or SLIT).
Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of Treatment
The percentage of participants who initiated SCIT or SLIT and completed 5 years of treatment was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled. If extract refills continued past the recommended time for therapy (e.g. 5 years from the start of therapy), the participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course. If the extract refills stopped prior to the end of the recommended time for therapy, but the last refill occurred within 6 months of the recommended time for therapy, this participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course.
At 5 years
Duration of Treatment With SCIT or SLIT
The mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR who initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.
Up to 5 years
Reason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended Course
The reason for discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT treatment more than 6 months before completion of the recommended course of therapy was recorded. The percentage of participants whose records were reveiwed and who discontinued SCIT or SLIT due to different reasons was calculated.
Up to 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT
Up to 5 years
Duration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR Alone
Up to 5 years
Study Arms (1)
Participants with Allergic Rhinitis (AR)
Patients in a private allergy practice who were diagnosed with AR, with or without asthma, and advised to consider AIT between January 2005 and June 2011 and whose medical records were retrospectively reviewed.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who were managed by physicians in a large allergy practice, recommended for AIT between 2005 and 2011 and identified by their electronic health records.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of AR with or without allergic conjunctivitis (AC)
- Documented provider-to-patient or parent discussion of AIT as a treatment option
You may not qualify if:
- Participants receiving AIT as an AR treatment without documented provider-to-patient or parent discussion of AIT as a treatment option
- Participants receiving immunotherapy for insect sensitivities only
- AIT started before 2005
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ALK-Abelló A/Slead
Related Publications (1)
Anolik R, Schwartz AM, Sajjan S, Allen-Ramey F. Patient initiation and persistence with allergen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Jul;113(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 9.
PMID: 24814759DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- ECOLOGIC OR COMMUNITY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2012
First Posted
March 9, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 3, 2017
Results First Posted
March 6, 2014
Record last verified: 2017-01