NCT01549340

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of participants that initiate allergen immunotherapy (AIT) upon the recommendation of their physician and the proportion of participants that persist with their AIT throughout the recommended course.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8,790

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2012

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2012

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 6, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

March 3, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

March 6, 2012

Results QC Date

January 23, 2014

Last Update Submit

January 18, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

RhinitisAllergen immunotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Percentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Drops

    The percentage of participants who were advised by their physician to start AIT and elected to initiate AIT was calculated. AIT initiation was broken down by type of AIT initiated (SCIT or SLIT).

    Up to 5 years

  • Percentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of Treatment

    The percentage of participants who initiated SCIT or SLIT and completed 5 years of treatment was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled. If extract refills continued past the recommended time for therapy (e.g. 5 years from the start of therapy), the participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course. If the extract refills stopped prior to the end of the recommended time for therapy, but the last refill occurred within 6 months of the recommended time for therapy, this participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course.

    At 5 years

  • Duration of Treatment With SCIT or SLIT

    The mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR who initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.

    Up to 5 years

  • Reason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended Course

    The reason for discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT treatment more than 6 months before completion of the recommended course of therapy was recorded. The percentage of participants whose records were reveiwed and who discontinued SCIT or SLIT due to different reasons was calculated.

    Up to 5 years

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT

    Up to 5 years

  • Duration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR Alone

    Up to 5 years

Study Arms (1)

Participants with Allergic Rhinitis (AR)

Patients in a private allergy practice who were diagnosed with AR, with or without asthma, and advised to consider AIT between January 2005 and June 2011 and whose medical records were retrospectively reviewed.

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients who were managed by physicians in a large allergy practice, recommended for AIT between 2005 and 2011 and identified by their electronic health records.

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of AR with or without allergic conjunctivitis (AC)
  • Documented provider-to-patient or parent discussion of AIT as a treatment option

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants receiving AIT as an AR treatment without documented provider-to-patient or parent discussion of AIT as a treatment option
  • Participants receiving immunotherapy for insect sensitivities only
  • AIT started before 2005

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Anolik R, Schwartz AM, Sajjan S, Allen-Ramey F. Patient initiation and persistence with allergen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Jul;113(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, PerennialRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalRhinitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rhinitis, AllergicNose DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System DiseasesRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfections

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
ECOLOGIC OR COMMUNITY
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2012

First Posted

March 9, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2012

Last Updated

March 3, 2017

Results First Posted

March 6, 2014

Record last verified: 2017-01