Meperidine as the Single Sedative Agent During Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Upper endoscopy is uncomfortable for most patients. Meperidine has both sedative and analgesic effects, so its use may be helpful for patients receiving upper endoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2012
CompletedMarch 8, 2012
March 1, 2012
8 months
February 28, 2012
March 7, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
discomfort score during esophageal intubation
patient self-reported discomfort score during esophageal intubation, assessed with a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS)
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
patient and endoscopist satisfaction score
9 months
patient tolerance of the procedure
9 months
endoscopist perception of patient tolerance ,
9 months
Study Arms (2)
meperidine
EXPERIMENTAL25 mg of meperidine is injected intramuscularly before EGD
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORplacebo was given intramuscularly before EGD
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy in our endoscopic room were enrolled.
You may not qualify if:
- A therapeutic upper endoscopic procedure, sedated endoscopy, contraindication to Buscopan (hyoscine N-butylbromide)
- Allergy to meperidine
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) risk Class 3 or higher
- Renal failure
- Decompensated cirrhosis
- Aged less than 20 years or more than 65 years
- Pregnancy
- Refusal to provide written informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
Chiayi City, Taiwan, 622, Taiwan
Related Publications (5)
Abraham NS, Fallone CA, Mayrand S, Huang J, Wieczorek P, Barkun AN. Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1692-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40157.x.
PMID: 15330904BACKGROUNDIshido S, Kinoshita Y, Kitajima N, Itoh T, Nishiyama K, Tojo M, Yano T, Inatome T, Fukuzaki H, Chiba T. Fentanyl for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 Nov-Dec;38(6):689-92. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70565-3.
PMID: 1473671BACKGROUNDLaluna L, Allen ML, Dimarino AJ Jr. The comparison of midazolam and topical lidocaine spray versus the combination of midazolam, meperidine, and topical lidocaine spray to sedate patients for upper endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Mar;53(3):289-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(01)70400-2.
PMID: 11231385BACKGROUNDDiab FH, King PD, Barthel JS, Marshall JB. Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jun;91(6):1120-5.
PMID: 8651156BACKGROUNDHsieh YH, Lin HJ, Hsieh JJ, Tseng KC, Tseng CW, Hung TH, Leung FW. Meperidine as the single sedative agent during esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;28(7):1167-73. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12183.
PMID: 23431993DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yu-Hsi Hsieh, Dr.
Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2012
First Posted
March 8, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 8, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03