NCT01547416

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate whether robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy give rise to the impairment of diaphragmatic function postoperatively, and whether combined general/epidural anesthesia could provide better postoperative diaphragmatic function.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 27, 2012

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2012

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

July 11, 2013

Status Verified

July 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

February 27, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 9, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Diaphragmatic dysfunctionGeneral anesthesiaEpidural Anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change of diaphragm movement using sonography (diaphragm inspiratory amplitude, diaphragm inspiratory and expiratory velocity)on postoperative day 1 and 2 from baseline (day before surgery)

    The measurements of diaphragmatic motion were attained at the posterior surface of the diaphragm. From the tracings on M-mode, the distance between echogenic lines (DIA) in cm and diaphragm inspiratory/expiratory velocity in cm.s-1 during quiet, deep, and sniff breathing were measured on the frozen images. Three consecutive sonographic examinations were performed, and the highest value of three measurements was recorded

    on the day before surgery until postoperative day 2

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in pulmonary function test on postoperative day 1 and 2 from baseline (day before surgery)

    on the day before surgery until postoperative day 2

Study Arms (2)

combined general/epidural anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL

epidural catheter was inserted in group GE at T8/9, T9/10, or T10/11 interspinous space with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle in lateral decubitus position and advanced 5 cm cephalad. Epidural analgesia was maintained using the patient-controlled analgesia technique.

Drug: epidural 250mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL of fentanyl, 5 mL/hr continuous infusion and 0.5 mL bolus dose

General anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients allocated to general anesthesia group did not receive epidural anesthesia.

Drug: no epidural drug administered

Interventions

Before the induction of anesthesia, epidural catheter was inserted in group GE at T8/9, T9/10, or T10/11 interspinous space with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle in lateral decubitus position and advanced 5 cm cephalad. . Epidural analgesia was maintained using the patient-controlled analgesia technique containing 250 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL fentanyl with setting of 5 mL/hr for continuous infusion and 0.5 mL of bolus dose. Lockout time was set to 15 min. General anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg of propofol and 50 mg of rocuronium. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. All the patients were ventilated with controlled mode of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight and respiratory rate was adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide between 35-40 mmHg.

combined general/epidural anesthesia

Patients allocated to general anesthesia group and DID NOT receive epidural anesthesia. General anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg of propofol and 50 mg of rocuronium. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. All the patients were ventilated with controlled mode of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight and respiratory rate was adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide between 35-40 mmHg.

General anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients of over 18 years of age undergoing elective Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with previous history of smoking, cardiopulmonary or neuromuscular disease or obesity (body mass index \> 30 kg.m-2)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Severence Hospital, Yonsei University Health System

Seoul, 120-752, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Injections, EpiduralRopivacaineFentanyl

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Injections, SpinalInjectionsDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeuticsAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Young Jun Oh, M.D. Ph.D.

    Severance Hospital, Yonsi University Health System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2012

First Posted

March 7, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

March 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2012

Last Updated

July 11, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-07

Locations