Placement of Perineural Catheters in the Popliteal Region
Comparison of Techniques for Placement of Perineural Catheters in the Popliteal Region
1 other identifier
interventional
40
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the hydrolocalization technique for placement of popliteal perineural catheters in comparison with the stimulating catheters. A non inferiority trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 12, 2012
November 1, 2012
1.2 years
February 3, 2012
November 9, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
consumption of local anesthetics
36 hours PO
Secondary Outcomes (1)
pain scores
36 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Hydrolocalization technique group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTechnique of placement of popliteal perineural catheter using the hydrolocalization technique with ultrasound
Stimulating Catheter technique group
ACTIVE COMPARATORA technique for placement of popliteal catheter with the aid of a neurostimulator
Interventions
Placement of perineural catheters in the popliteal region comparing two techniques. while the drugs used are the same (ropivacaine 0.6% for initial bolus and 0.2% for continuous technique) we will compare dosage required in each group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults
- BMI less than 30
You may not qualify if:
- known allergies to local anesthetics or other drugs used
- patient refusal
- any local or systemic contraindication to the use of popliteal block
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Attikon Hospitallead
Study Sites (2)
Attikon Hospital
Athens, Greece
Policlinico Tor Vergata
Rome, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Saranteas T, Adoni A, Sidiropoulou T, Paraskeuopoulos T, Kostopanagiotou G. Combined ultrasound imaging and hydrolocalization technique for accurate placement of perineural catheters. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):1008-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer375. No abstract available.
PMID: 22088876BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tatiana F Sidiropoulou, MD, PhD
Attikon Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Theodosios Saranteas, MD, PhD
Attikon Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Georgia G Kostopanagiotou, MD, PhD
Attikon Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer in Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2012
First Posted
March 7, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 12, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11