Ketamine-propofol Versus Ketamine Alone for Procedural Sedation in Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Using Ketamine for procedural sedation in adults is often uncomfortable for emergency physicians because of the significant proportion of patients experimenting recovery agitation. The investigators believe that combining propofol to ketamine, the proportion of recovery agitation will be significantly lowered. The objectives of this double-blinded, randomized controlled trial are to compare the proportion of recovery agitation in adults receiving procedural sedation with ketamine-propofol versus ketamine alone, and to compare the proportion of other classical procedural sedation side-effects and parameters such as respiratory depression, hypotension, sedation duration, time of recovery, procedural failures, and levels of satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 31, 2026
March 1, 2026
3.8 years
February 6, 2012
March 26, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of recovery agitation
Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection
Recovery agitation is noted after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Time from first injection to optimal sedation
Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection (30 minutes)
Proportion of respiratory depression
respiratory depression is assessed during procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)
Proportion of arterial hypotension
Hypotension is assessed during procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)
Proportion of vomiting
vomiting is assessed after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)
Recovery time
Recovery time is assessed after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ketamine-propofol
EXPERIMENTALKetamine alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
K= Ketamine I= Intralipid placebo At t0: 1 mg/kg of K (0.1 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.1 ml/kg of I (physical placebo of propofol in the other arm). At t0 + 4 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (Ramsay Sedation Score of 4 or 5): 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.05 ml/kg of I. At t0 + 8 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (Ramsay Sedation Score of 4 or 5): 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.05 ml/kg of I. At t0 + 12 min, if maximal doses have been used (2 mg/kg of K) but the optimal sedation has not been obtained, the procedural sedation will be recorded as a failure in the analysis, and the patient will receive another procedural sedation product (at the discretion of the caregiver).
K= Kétamine P= Propofol RSS= Ramsay Sedation Score At t0: 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.1 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.5 mg/k of P (0.1 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 4 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (RSS of 4 or 5): 0.25 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.25 mg/kg of P (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 8 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (RSS of 4 or 5): 0.25 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.25 mg/kg of P (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 12 min, if maximal doses have been reached (1 mg/kg of K + 1 mg/kg of P) but the optimal sedation has not been obtained, the procedural sedation will be recorded as a failure in the analysis, and the patient will receive another procedural sedation product (at the discretion of the caregiver).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and older
- indication of procedural sedation
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to propofol or ketamine
- alcohol or drug intoxication
- altered mental status
- ASA physical status score \> 2
- hemodynamic unstability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital St Roch
Nice, 06006, France
Related Publications (1)
Lemoel F, Contenti J, Giolito D, Boiffier M, Rapp J, Istria J, Fournier M, Ageron FX, Levraut J. Adverse Events With Ketamine Versus Ketofol for Procedural Sedation on Adults: A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(12):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/acem.13226. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
PMID: 28493642RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fabien LEMOEL, MD
CHU de Nice, FRANCE
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jacques LEVRAUT, PD, MD
CHU de Nice, FRANCE
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2012
First Posted
March 6, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 31, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03