NCT01544725

Brief Summary

Using Ketamine for procedural sedation in adults is often uncomfortable for emergency physicians because of the significant proportion of patients experimenting recovery agitation. The investigators believe that combining propofol to ketamine, the proportion of recovery agitation will be significantly lowered. The objectives of this double-blinded, randomized controlled trial are to compare the proportion of recovery agitation in adults receiving procedural sedation with ketamine-propofol versus ketamine alone, and to compare the proportion of other classical procedural sedation side-effects and parameters such as respiratory depression, hypotension, sedation duration, time of recovery, procedural failures, and levels of satisfaction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2012

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2012

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 31, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

February 6, 2012

Last Update Submit

March 26, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Procedural sedationKetamine-propofolKetamine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of recovery agitation

    Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Recovery agitation is noted after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Time from first injection to optimal sedation

    Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection (30 minutes)

  • Proportion of respiratory depression

    respiratory depression is assessed during procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

  • Proportion of arterial hypotension

    Hypotension is assessed during procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

  • Proportion of vomiting

    vomiting is assessed after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

  • Recovery time

    Recovery time is assessed after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ketamine-propofol

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Procedural sedation with ketamine-propofol combination

Ketamine alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Procedural sedation with ketamine alone

Interventions

K= Ketamine I= Intralipid placebo At t0: 1 mg/kg of K (0.1 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.1 ml/kg of I (physical placebo of propofol in the other arm). At t0 + 4 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (Ramsay Sedation Score of 4 or 5): 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.05 ml/kg of I. At t0 + 8 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (Ramsay Sedation Score of 4 or 5): 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.05 ml/kg of I. At t0 + 12 min, if maximal doses have been used (2 mg/kg of K) but the optimal sedation has not been obtained, the procedural sedation will be recorded as a failure in the analysis, and the patient will receive another procedural sedation product (at the discretion of the caregiver).

Ketamine alone

K= Kétamine P= Propofol RSS= Ramsay Sedation Score At t0: 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.1 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.5 mg/k of P (0.1 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 4 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (RSS of 4 or 5): 0.25 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.25 mg/kg of P (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 8 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (RSS of 4 or 5): 0.25 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.25 mg/kg of P (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 12 min, if maximal doses have been reached (1 mg/kg of K + 1 mg/kg of P) but the optimal sedation has not been obtained, the procedural sedation will be recorded as a failure in the analysis, and the patient will receive another procedural sedation product (at the discretion of the caregiver).

Ketamine-propofol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years and older
  • indication of procedural sedation

You may not qualify if:

  • allergy to propofol or ketamine
  • alcohol or drug intoxication
  • altered mental status
  • ASA physical status score \> 2
  • hemodynamic unstability

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hôpital St Roch

Nice, 06006, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Lemoel F, Contenti J, Giolito D, Boiffier M, Rapp J, Istria J, Fournier M, Ageron FX, Levraut J. Adverse Events With Ketamine Versus Ketofol for Procedural Sedation on Adults: A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(12):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/acem.13226. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fractures, BoneJoint Dislocations

Interventions

Ketamine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Fabien LEMOEL, MD

    CHU de Nice, FRANCE

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jacques LEVRAUT, PD, MD

    CHU de Nice, FRANCE

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2012

First Posted

March 6, 2012

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 31, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations