NCT01543360

Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to compare the rate of successful establishment of a central venous catheter in the first two attempts of ultrasound-guided puncture between two techniques: (1) a subclavian technique versus (2) an axillary technique.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
132

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 20, 2012

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 5, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2012

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 23, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 23, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

February 20, 2012

Last Update Submit

November 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

axillary veinsub clavian veincomparison of strategies

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Central venous catheter established within first 2 puncture attempts

    yes/no

    approximately 3 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Central venous catheter established upon first punction attempt

    approximately 3 minutes

  • Establishment of a central venous catheter

    approximately 3 minutes

  • The time necessary for the establishment of a central venous catheter

    approximately 3 minutes

  • The time necessary for the establishment of a central venous catheter

    approximately 3 minutes

  • presence/absence of complications

    Day 1

Study Arms (2)

Axillary strategy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The first two attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed via the distal approach (axillary vein). The third and fourth attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the medial approach (subclavian vein).

Procedure: Axillary strategy

Subclavian strategy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The first two attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the medial approach (subclavian vein). The third and fourth attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the distal approach (axillary vein).

Procedure: Subclavian strategy

Interventions

The first two attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed via the distal approach (axillary vein). The third and fourth attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the medial approach (subclavian vein). The same puncture material/devices will be used in both arms of the study.

Axillary strategy

The first two attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the medial approach (subclavian vein). The third and fourth attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the distal approach (axillary vein). The same puncture material/devices will be used in both arms of the study.

Subclavian strategy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is available for 24 hours of follow-up
  • Patient requiring the establishment of a central venous catheter

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • Patient has a body mass index \< 15 or \> 40
  • Congenital or acquired anatomical deformity (radiation therapy, trauma, surgery) of the axillary and/or subclavian regions
  • Bleeding disorder (platelets \< 50,000, prothrombine \< 50%, activated cephaline time \> 2 times the control value)
  • Severe hypoxemia defined by a ratio PaO2 / FIO2 \< 100
  • Infection of the puncture area
  • Known thrombosis of the subclavian or axillary veins
  • Scheduled length of hospitalization less than 24 hours
  • Agitated or non-cooperative patient
  • The patient has already been included in this study
  • subclavian and axillary veins are not simultaneously echogenic on one or both sides (left and right).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Buzancais G, Roger C, Bastide S, Jeannes P, Lefrant JY, Muller L. Comparison of two ultrasound guided approaches for axillary vein catheterization: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):215-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev458.

Study Officials

  • Jean Yves Lefrant, MD PhD

    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2012

First Posted

March 5, 2012

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 23, 2013

Study Completion

May 23, 2013

Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2015-03

Locations