Evaluation of the CR Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus
RESET2
Systematic Evaluation of the Acoustic CR ® Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new device delivering a sound-based intervention (termed acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation) has significant clinical benefit for people with intrusive tinnitus. It is hypothesised that the particular pattern of sound stimulation delivered by the device acts to break up patterns of synchronous nerve firing in the brain that may be responsible for the sensation of tinnitus. We will also measure brain activity in a subset of participants to determine if the intervention results in changes in brainwave activity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 18, 2015
CompletedAugust 22, 2016
May 1, 2015
1.5 years
February 24, 2012
April 18, 2015
July 21, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)
Change in the global score on a 27 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.
Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)
Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)
Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)
Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Oscillatory Power in the Delta Brainwave Pattern as Measured by Electroencephalography (EEG)
Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)
Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)
Baseline (visit 2) and 36 weeks (visit 10)
Study Arms (2)
CR Neuromodulation
EXPERIMENTALAdaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device. Participants receive the intervention according to the manufacturer/funder training given to the study team.
Tinnitus masking
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive the same Adaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device, but it will NOT be programmed according to the therapeutic algorithm (0-12 weeks).
Interventions
Ear level device which delivers patterned sound stimulation. The experimental arm will use the device fitted according to audiologist training given by the manufacturer/funder. An individually specified sound stimulation algorithm is hypothesised to interrupt tinnitus generating activity in the brain. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks participants will be unblinded and continue with the same experimental intervention. In weeks 13-36 participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.
The active comparator uses the same ear level device and also delivers patterned sound but the stimulus will be determined according to an algorithm predicted not to break up tinnitus generating activity in the brain. It may have a masking effect. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks, the participants will be unblinded and the device algorithm will be reprogrammed in the same way as the experimental intervention. In weeks 13-24 participants will be asked to wear the device for 6 hours per day, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. In weeks 25-36 they will be asked to continue using the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pure tone average \<60 dB HL in the ear where tinnitus is perceived
- Must be able to hear all stimulation tones presented by the device
- Chronic subjective tinnitus for more than 3 months
- Dominant tinnitus frequency measured between 0.2 and 10 kHz
- At least mild tinnitus score on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
- Willing to wear the device for 4-6 hours daily during the trial
- Sufficient command of English language to read, understand and complete the questionnaires
- Able and willing to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Objective tinnitus, Meniere's disease, craniomandibular induced Tinnitus
- Pulsatile tinnitus
- Intermittent tinnitus
- Severe anxiety
- Severe depression
- Catastrophic tinnitus
- Hearing-aids wearers for less than 9 months
- Hearing-aid wearers with audiological adjustments within last 3 months
- Absolute thresholds \> 70 dB on individual frequencies up to 8 kHz (unable to sufficiently hear the stimulus)
- Taking part in another trial during the last 30 days before study start
- The individually tailored training stimulus is uncomfortable or not acceptable to the participant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trustlead
- University of Nottinghamcollaborator
- University College, Londoncollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University College London Ear Institute
London, WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham
Nottingham, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom
Related Publications (6)
Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Gander PE, Hall DA. Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 5;9(12):e114553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114553. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25478690BACKGROUNDHoare DJ, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, McAlpine D, Hall DA. Evaluation of the acoustic coordinated reset (CR(R)) neuromodulation therapy for tinnitus: study protocol for a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 10;14:207. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-207.
PMID: 23842505BACKGROUNDFackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
PMID: 26415998BACKGROUNDPierzycki RH, McNamara AJ, Hoare DJ, Hall DA. Whole scalp resting state EEG of oscillatory brain activity shows no parametric relationship with psychoacoustic and psychosocial assessment of tinnitus: A repeated measures study. Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
PMID: 26584760BACKGROUNDFackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Response to Letter: Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:237-238. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 27039256BACKGROUNDHall DA, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, Greenberg D, Sereda M, Hoare DJ. Systematic Evaluation of the T30 Neurostimulator Treatment for Tinnitus: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension. Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):317. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030317.
PMID: 35326273DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Clinical Trial Protocol inadequately specified, particularly (i) device fitting, (ii) tolerance for pitch matching shifts and (iii) monitoring research audiologists after training. Specification of placebo algorithm is not evidenced by published data
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor Deborah Hall, Professor of Hearing Sciences
- Organization
- University of Nottingham
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Deborah A Hall, PhD
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Unviersity of Nottingham
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Derek J Hoare, PhD
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David McAlpine, PhD
University College London, Ear Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2012
First Posted
March 1, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 22, 2016
Results First Posted
June 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05