NCT01541969

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new device delivering a sound-based intervention (termed acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation) has significant clinical benefit for people with intrusive tinnitus. It is hypothesised that the particular pattern of sound stimulation delivered by the device acts to break up patterns of synchronous nerve firing in the brain that may be responsible for the sensation of tinnitus. We will also measure brain activity in a subset of participants to determine if the intervention results in changes in brainwave activity.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2012

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 1, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2012

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 18, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 22, 2016

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

February 24, 2012

Results QC Date

April 18, 2015

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

EarHearing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)

    Change in the global score on a 27 item, multi-attribute questionnaire measure of the functional impact of tinnitus (0-100 scale). Change was computed as 'visit 2' - 'visit 6' and so a positive change score indicates a reduction of tinnitus symptoms.

    Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)

    Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

  • Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)

    Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

  • World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Normalized Oscillatory Power in the Delta Brainwave Pattern as Measured by Electroencephalography (EEG)

    Baseline (visit 2) and 12 weeks (visit 6)

  • Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)

    Baseline (visit 2) and 36 weeks (visit 10)

Study Arms (2)

CR Neuromodulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Adaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device. Participants receive the intervention according to the manufacturer/funder training given to the study team.

Device: CR Neuromodulation

Tinnitus masking

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive the same Adaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device, but it will NOT be programmed according to the therapeutic algorithm (0-12 weeks).

Device: Tinnitus masking

Interventions

Ear level device which delivers patterned sound stimulation. The experimental arm will use the device fitted according to audiologist training given by the manufacturer/funder. An individually specified sound stimulation algorithm is hypothesised to interrupt tinnitus generating activity in the brain. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks participants will be unblinded and continue with the same experimental intervention. In weeks 13-36 participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.

Also known as: Acoustic Coordinated Reset Neuromodualtion
CR Neuromodulation

The active comparator uses the same ear level device and also delivers patterned sound but the stimulus will be determined according to an algorithm predicted not to break up tinnitus generating activity in the brain. It may have a masking effect. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks, the participants will be unblinded and the device algorithm will be reprogrammed in the same way as the experimental intervention. In weeks 13-24 participants will be asked to wear the device for 6 hours per day, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. In weeks 25-36 they will be asked to continue using the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.

Also known as: Tinnitus masking only (by CR Neuromodulation device)
Tinnitus masking

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pure tone average \<60 dB HL in the ear where tinnitus is perceived
  • Must be able to hear all stimulation tones presented by the device
  • Chronic subjective tinnitus for more than 3 months
  • Dominant tinnitus frequency measured between 0.2 and 10 kHz
  • At least mild tinnitus score on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
  • Willing to wear the device for 4-6 hours daily during the trial
  • Sufficient command of English language to read, understand and complete the questionnaires
  • Able and willing to give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Objective tinnitus, Meniere's disease, craniomandibular induced Tinnitus
  • Pulsatile tinnitus
  • Intermittent tinnitus
  • Severe anxiety
  • Severe depression
  • Catastrophic tinnitus
  • Hearing-aids wearers for less than 9 months
  • Hearing-aid wearers with audiological adjustments within last 3 months
  • Absolute thresholds \> 70 dB on individual frequencies up to 8 kHz (unable to sufficiently hear the stimulus)
  • Taking part in another trial during the last 30 days before study start
  • The individually tailored training stimulus is uncomfortable or not acceptable to the participant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University College London Ear Institute

London, WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom

Location

NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham

Nottingham, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Gander PE, Hall DA. Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 5;9(12):e114553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114553. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25478690BACKGROUND
  • Hoare DJ, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, McAlpine D, Hall DA. Evaluation of the acoustic coordinated reset (CR(R)) neuromodulation therapy for tinnitus: study protocol for a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 10;14:207. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-207.

    PMID: 23842505BACKGROUND
  • Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

    PMID: 26415998BACKGROUND
  • Pierzycki RH, McNamara AJ, Hoare DJ, Hall DA. Whole scalp resting state EEG of oscillatory brain activity shows no parametric relationship with psychoacoustic and psychosocial assessment of tinnitus: A repeated measures study. Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 14.

    PMID: 26584760BACKGROUND
  • Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Response to Letter: Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:237-238. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 30. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27039256BACKGROUND
  • Hall DA, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, Greenberg D, Sereda M, Hoare DJ. Systematic Evaluation of the T30 Neurostimulator Treatment for Tinnitus: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension. Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):317. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030317.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

Clinical Trial Protocol inadequately specified, particularly (i) device fitting, (ii) tolerance for pitch matching shifts and (iii) monitoring research audiologists after training. Specification of placebo algorithm is not evidenced by published data

Results Point of Contact

Title
Professor Deborah Hall, Professor of Hearing Sciences
Organization
University of Nottingham

Study Officials

  • Deborah A Hall, PhD

    NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Unviersity of Nottingham

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Derek J Hoare, PhD

    NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David McAlpine, PhD

    University College London, Ear Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2012

First Posted

March 1, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

August 22, 2016

Results First Posted

June 18, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations