Cocktail Sedation Containing Propofol Versus Conventional Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
1 other identifier
interventional
205
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) practically requires moderate to deep sedation by a combination of benzodiazepine and opioid. Propofol as a sole agent may cause oversedation. A combination (cocktail) of infused propofol, meperidine, and midazolam can reduce the dosage of propofol and may result in a lower risk of oversedation. The investigators prospectively compare the efficacy, recovery time, patient satisfactory, and side effects between cocktail and conventional sedations in patients undergoing ERCP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2006
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2012
CompletedFebruary 28, 2012
February 1, 2012
2.7 years
February 16, 2012
February 27, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
procedure related time
(1) induction time (the time from sedation to scope intubation), (2) procedural time (the time from scope intubation to scope withdrawal), and (3) recovery time (the time from scope withdrawal to full recovery (modified Aldrete score of 10)). The induction time and procedural time were recorded by the nurse in the endoscopy unit.
participants will be followed for the duration of procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cardiopulmonary complications
participants will be followed for the duration of procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Study Arms (2)
conventional group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor induction, 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered. To maintain conscious level of patient at moderate or deep level, 25 mg of meperidine and/or 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered as necessary.
cocktail group
EXPERIMENTALFor induction, 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered. To maintain conscious level of patient at moderate or deep level, 1% propofol at the rate of 1 mg/kg/hr was administered. An additional 0.5 mg/kg bolus was administered as needed to achieve the designed conscious level.
Interventions
For induction, 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered in both groups. In the cocktail group, one milligram per kilogram body weight of 1% propofol emulsion (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Irvine, CA) was slowly infused by an automated pump (Terufusion syringe pump TE-331, Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). To maintain conscious level of patient in the conventional group to be at moderate or deep level, 25 mg of meperidine and/or 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered as necessary, whereas patients in the cocktail group were continuously administered with 1% propofol at the rate of 1 mg/kg/hr. An additional 0.5 mg/kg bolus was administered as needed to achieve the designed conscious level.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for ERCP
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical classification IV - V
- History of sulfite, egg or soy bean allergy
- Emergency need for ERCP
- Informed consent could not be obtained
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gastroenterology Unit, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Patumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
Related Publications (1)
Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R, Ridtitid W, Kongkam P, Poonyathawon S, Ponauthai Y, Sumdin S, Kullavanijaya P. Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Aug 9;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-20.
PMID: 22873637DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rungsun Rerknimitr, MD
Gastroenterology unit, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2012
First Posted
February 28, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 28, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-02