The Leeds Women's Wellbeing (LWW) Study
LWW
A Study to Investigate the Short and Long Term Effects of Two 12-week Healthy Eating Interventions on Body Weight, Body Composition, Appetite Control, Biomarkers of Health and Subjective Wellbeing in Overweight Women
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this parallel design study is to assess the relative effects of two 12-week healthy eating dietary interventions: general healthy eating (Diet A) and general healthy eating combined with advice to increase fibre intake (Diet B) to at least 25g/day (with a large proportion of the fibre intake derived from cereal or wheat bran), in overweight low-fibre consuming premenopausal female adults on body weight change (kg). It is hypothesized that adding fibre to a healthy eating diet (Diet B) would lead to greater weight loss and/or weight loss maintenance than following a healthy eating diet alone (Diet A).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2012
CompletedMay 22, 2014
May 1, 2014
9 months
December 2, 2011
May 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
body weight change (kg) during the 12 week intervention
Body weight will be measured three times using ADP (BodPod, Concord, CA, USA); once during the inclusion phase (week -1), at the end of the intervention (week 12) and at follow up (one year later). Body weight will also be measured six times using bioimpedance (Tanita, Illinois, USA); once during the inclusion phase (week -1) and then again during weeks 4, 8, 12 of the intervention phase and at follow up (one month later and one year later)
at screening and every 4 weeks at each subsequent visit, the last week of the intervention (week 12), at one month and one year after the intervention has finished
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Food Intake
7 day food diary the week before starting the intervention; 3 day food diaries at baseline (first week of the intervention), then baseline +4 weeks, baseline +8 weeks, baseline +12 weeks, baseline +12 months
Glycaemic regulation
at baseline (first week of the intervention over a period of 3 days) and at baseline +12 weeks (last week of the intervention over a period of 3 days)
Biochemical measures
at baseline (first week of the intervention) and then at baseline +12 weeks (last week of the intervention)
Subjective symptoms, wellbeing and Mood
Wellbeing Diary Booklets (WDBs) will be completed each day from screening till the last week of the intervention (week 12)
Sleep and body shape perception
at baseline (first week of the intervention), baseline +4 weeks, baseline +8 weeks, baseline +12 weeks, baseline +16 weeks and then at baseline +12 months
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
High fibre diet
EXPERIMENTALHealthy eating diet
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Participants were randomly assigned to one of two parallel arms: Diet A:healthy eating without extra advice to increase fibre intake or Diet B: healthy eating with extra advice to increase fibre intake to a minimum of 25g/d. Healthy eating advice was based on the British Heart Foundation booklet: "Food Should Be Fun And Healthy". Participants following Diet A were encouraged to eat breakfast cereals and were provided with complementary cereals and snacks low in fibre. Participants following Diet B were encouraged to eat high fibre breakfast cereals and to incorporate wheat bran fibre in other meals. Complementary high fibre cereals and snacks were provided.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- years of age (premenopausal)
- Self reported good health
- Body Mass Index (BMI) within overweight/obese range (26-35kg/m2)
- Willingness to consume study foods and prepared to eat breakfast cereals as part of the intervention
- Non-smokers or given up more than 6 months ago
- Exercising no more than 4 times per week at a medium intensity
- Weight stable in the last 3 months (fluctuation of no more than 3kg)
- Current fibre intake (≤ 15g/day) according to DINE and verified by 7 day food diary (fibre points)
- Ability to adequately understand verbal and written information in English
You may not qualify if:
- Menopausal or showing menopausal symptoms (e.g. frequent/recurrent hot flushes) at screening or taking any supplements for menopausal symptoms
- Type 2 Diabetes; Cardiac pacemaker fitted
- Taking medication and/or supplements known to affect appetite/body weight in the last 6 months (e.g. asthma, steroids, anti-depressants)
- BMI outside range of 26-35 kg/m2
- Food allergies or aversions to foods likely to be consumed within the study (e.g. wheat bran, nuts)
- Non-smokers or given up more than 6 months ago
- Exercising more than 4 times per week at a medium intensity
- Shift work (night shifts)
- Pregnant or planning a pregnancy within the next year; having been pregnant or lactating within the previous 6 months
- No history of, or current eating disorders as determined using the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26;Gardner et al., 1982; a score higher than 20)
- Current fibre intake (\>15g/day according to DINE)
- Insufficient English language skills to complete all study questionnaires
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Psychological Sciences
Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Louise Dye, Professor
University of Leeds
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2011
First Posted
February 27, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05