Local Infiltration Versus Block Against Pains After High Tibial Osteotomy
HTO_pains
Examination of the LIA (Local Infiltration) Versus Regional Blockade as Pain Management for Open-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether patients operated with high tibia open-wedge osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee can be treated more appropriately, so that both healing and rehabilitation are served optimally.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 22, 2016
January 1, 2016
5.7 years
August 2, 2011
January 21, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PN morphine consumption
Use of morphine recorded in medicine journal
Hours (up to 24 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain
Hours (up to 24 hours)
Knee Function
Months (up to 16 months)
General Health Parameters
Months (up to 16 months)
Stability in the osteotomy
Months (up to 16 months)
Study Arms (2)
Femoral Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal Infiltration Anagesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Planned primary open-wedge high tibia osteotomy
- Patients (male/female) ≥ 18 år
- Patients giving written informed consent and authority.
- Patients receiving epidural anaesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with intolerance to trial medications
- Rejection of or contraindicated epidural anaesthesia
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
- Patients with Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35
- Patients that do not read or write Danish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Clinik Farsoe, Aalborg University Hospital
Farsø, Northern Jutland, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anders C Laursen, MD
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
- STUDY CHAIR
Mogens B Laursen, MD, PhD
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2011
First Posted
February 23, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01