Efficacy and Safety of Diosmin 600mg Versus Placebo on Painful Symptomatology in Patients With Chronic Venous Disease of Lower Limbs
EDEN
Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Diosmin 600mg on Painful Symptomatology in Patients With Chronic Venous Disease of Lower Limbs: a Multicentric, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial in Parallel Groups
1 other identifier
interventional
378
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diosmin has a well established use status in improvement of the symptoms of venolymphatic insufficiency: heavy legs, pain, primo-decubitus restlessness and as complement treatment of capillary fragility. Nevertheless, diosmin 600 mg did not benefit from a rigorous clinical study versus placebo, to establish its efficacy in the pain relief in Chronic Venous Disease (CVD). The aim of this project led by Dr. Guex is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diosmin 600 mg - DIOVENOR® on the painful symptoms of CVD of the lower limbs, in a multicentre, controlled, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedApril 29, 2013
April 1, 2013
1.2 years
February 10, 2012
April 26, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of Visual analog Scale score for assessment of the painful venous symptomatology
baseline and after 28 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
- Painful symptom intensity (daily VAS score) Area Under the Curve
28 days
- Daily VAS score for Response rate
28 days
- Daily VAS score for Time to response
28 days
- Score of Quality of life questionnaire (SQOR-V)
Between baseline and 28 days
- Patient's and physician's global satisfaction score
At 28 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Diosmin
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient, man or woman, aged 18 and over,
- Patient presenting a C1s or C2s venous disease grade of the lower limbs
- Patient presenting a painful venous symptomatology in the lower limbs for at least 15 days.
- Patient suffering from venous symptomatology in one leg with a painful symptom intensity higher or equal to 30 mm (VAS= 100mm)
You may not qualify if:
- Patient using elastic venous compression
- Patient presenting permanent oedema,
- Patients presenting venous skin changes,
- Patient whose activity in the 4 following weeks (that is to say during the study) would be different from his/her usual activities (before the study),
- Patient suffering from a pathology generating other pains than venous pains in the lower limbs,
- Patient with a history of lower limbs trauma responsible for sequel pains,
- Patient with a known deep venous reflux,
- Patient having a known hypersensitivity to diosmin or one of the excipients
- Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption ),
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dr Jean-Jérôme GUEX
Nice, 06000, France
Related Publications (1)
Martinez-Zapata MJ, Vernooij RW, Simancas-Racines D, Uriona Tuma SM, Stein AT, Moreno Carriles RMM, Vargas E, Bonfill Cosp X. Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 3;11(11):CD003229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003229.pub4.
PMID: 33141449DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Jérôme GUEX, MD
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2012
First Posted
February 15, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 29, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04