Study Stopped
Resident Project which was not followed through after graduation
Randomized Trial Comparing Epiretinal Membrane Surgery With and Without Internal Limiting Membrane Removal
A Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Epiretinal Membrane Surgery With and Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Macular epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a semitranslucent, avascular, fibrocellular membrane on the inner surface along the internal limiting membrane (ILM) of the retina. ERM may cause symptomatic visual disturbances and vision loss. Since the 1970s, pars plana vitrectomy has been performed to remove the membranes with few complications, and surgical results are generally good. Recurrence rates of 5-16% have been reported. Recently, ILM peeling in ERM surgery have been popularized by a number of retrospective studies and one prospective case series to minimize the rate of ERM recurrences (16% recurrence in ERM surgery with ILM peel compares to 0% recurrence in ERM surgery without ILM peel). Surgical removal of the friable and transparent ILM is difficult and increases the risk of trauma to the retina. In addition, indocyanine green (ICG), a dye commonly used intra-operatively to enhance ILM visualization, is costly and has been shown to be toxic to the retina. The investigators study will be the first randomized-controlled multi-centred clinical trial to compare the outcomes of ERM surgery with and without ILM peeling. The results will help guide and standardize the surgical treatment of macular ERM; to minimize unnecessary surgical risks, as well as to help economize healthcare cost.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2017
CompletedSeptember 21, 2018
December 1, 2015
3.7 years
January 13, 2012
September 19, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline in macular thickness on optical coherence tomography at 6 months post-surgery (intervention)
Comparing change at 6 months following surgery and baseline
Change from baseline in visual acuity at 6 months post-surgery (intervention)
Comparing change of visual acuity at 6 months following surgery and baseline
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change from baseline in macular thickness on optical coherence tomography at 1 month post-surgery (intervention)
1 month following surgery
Change from baseline in macular thickness on optical coherence tomography at 12 months post-surgery
12 months following surgery
Change from baseline in visual acuity at 1 month post-surgery (intervention)
1 month following surgery (intervention)
Change from baseline in visual acuity at 3 months post-surgery (intervention)
3 months following surgery (intervention)
Change from baseline in visual acuity at 12 months post-surgery (intervention)
12 months following surgery (intervention)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Epiretinal Membrane Surgery without ILM peel
ACTIVE COMPARATOREpiretinal Membrane Surgery with ILM peel (ICG assisted)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCombined CE & IOL and ERM surgery without ILM peel
ACTIVE COMPARATORCombined CE & IOL and ERM surgery with ILM peel (ICG assisted)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
23 gauge pars plana vitrectomy with diluted intravitreal triamcinolone for visualization
Indocyanine green dye is prepared from 25mg powder vial from AKORN INC., 10 mL diluent provided in kit. This is further diluted to final concentration of 0.5mg/mL using 50% sterile dextrose solution
Cataract extraction by phacoemulsification and insertion foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens implant
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- ERM on clinical exam and/or macular OCT
- Visual acuity of 20/40 or worse (attributable to ERM)
You may not qualify if:
- Prior surgery for ERM in the "study eye"
- Macular edema secondary to arterial/venous occlusion(s)
- Central serous retinopathy
- Age related macular degeneration
- Diabetic cystoid macular edema
- Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- Uveitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Related Publications (28)
Shimada H, Nakashizuka H, Hattori T, Mori R, Mizutani Y, Yuzawa M. Double staining with brilliant blue G and double peeling for epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.024. Epub 2009 May 8.
PMID: 19427701BACKGROUNDWise GN. Preretinal macular fibrosis. (An analysis of 90 cases). Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962). 1972;92:131-40. No abstract available.
PMID: 4515504BACKGROUNDFraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Klein R, Varma R; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes in latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;45(6):1732-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1295.
PMID: 15161833BACKGROUNDKlein R, Klein BE, Wang Q, Moss SE. The epidemiology of epiretinal membranes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:403-25; discussion 425-30. No abstract available.
PMID: 7886875BACKGROUNDHirokawa H, Jalkh AE, Takahashi M, Takahashi M, Trempe CL, Schepens CL. Role of the vitreous in idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Feb 15;101(2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90589-1.
PMID: 3946531BACKGROUNDWise GN. Relationship of idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis to posterior vitreous detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975 Mar;79(3):358-62. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(75)90606-6.
PMID: 1121991BACKGROUNDMitchell P, Smith W, Chey T, Wang JJ, Chang A. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes. The Blue Mountains Eye Study, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1997 Jun;104(6):1033-40. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30190-0.
PMID: 9186446BACKGROUNDKawasaki R, Wang JJ, Sato H, Mitchell P, Kato T, Kawata S, Kayama T, Yamashita H, Wong TY. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes in an adult Japanese population: the Funagata study. Eye (Lond). 2009 May;23(5):1045-51. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.238. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
PMID: 19440207BACKGROUNDSmiddy WE, Maguire AM, Green WR, Michels RG, de la Cruz Z, Enger C, Jaeger M, Rice TA. Idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Ultrastructural characteristics and clinicopathologic correlation. Ophthalmology. 1989 Jun;96(6):811-20; discussion 821. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32811-9.
PMID: 2740079BACKGROUNDWiznia RA. Posterior vitreous detachment and idiopathic preretinal macular gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Aug 15;102(2):196-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90144-3.
PMID: 3740180BACKGROUNDSidd RJ, Fine SL, Owens SL, Patz A. Idiopathic preretinal gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;94(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90189-1.
PMID: 7091281BACKGROUNDBellhorn MB, Friedman AH, Wise GN, Henkind P. Ultrastructure and clinicopathologic correlation of idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975 Mar;79(3):366-73. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(75)90608-x.
PMID: 1121993BACKGROUNDClarkson JG, Green WR, Massof D. A histopathologic review of 168 cases of preretinal membrane. 1977. Retina. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(5 Suppl):1-17. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200507001-00006. No abstract available.
PMID: 16049358BACKGROUNDAppiah AP, Hirose T, Kado M. A review of 324 cases of idiopathic premacular gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Nov 15;106(5):533-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90581-8.
PMID: 3189467BACKGROUNDTing FS, Kwok AK. Treatment of epiretinal membrane: an update. Hong Kong Med J. 2005 Dec;11(6):496-502.
PMID: 16340027BACKGROUNDMichels RG. A clinical and histopathologic study of epiretinal membranes affecting the macula and removed by vitreous surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1982;80:580-656. No abstract available.
PMID: 6763804BACKGROUNDPuliafito CA, Hee MR, Lin CP, Reichel E, Schuman JS, Duker JS, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG. Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1995 Feb;102(2):217-29. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31032-9.
PMID: 7862410BACKGROUNDFalkner-Radler CI, Glittenberg C, Hagen S, Benesch T, Binder S. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for monitoring epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):798-805. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.034. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
PMID: 20045567BACKGROUNDFraser-Bell S, Guzowski M, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Mitchell P. Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jan;110(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01443-4.
PMID: 12511343BACKGROUNDKwok AKh, Lai TY, Yuen KS. Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;33(4):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01015.x.
PMID: 16033350BACKGROUNDGrewing R, Mester U. Results of surgery for epiretinal membranes and their recurrences. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Apr;80(4):323-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.4.323.
PMID: 8703883BACKGROUNDPark DW, Dugel PU, Garda J, Sipperley JO, Thach A, Sneed SR, Blaisdell J. Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jan;110(1):62-4. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01440-9.
PMID: 12511347BACKGROUNDBovey EH, Uffer S, Achache F. Surgery for epimacular membrane: impact of retinal internal limiting membrane removal on functional outcome. Retina. 2004 Oct;24(5):728-35. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200410000-00007.
PMID: 15492626BACKGROUNDBurk SE, Da Mata AP, Snyder ME, Rosa RH Jr, Foster RE. Indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the retinal internal limiting membrane. Ophthalmology. 2000 Nov;107(11):2010-4. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00375-4.
PMID: 11054324BACKGROUNDGale JS, Proulx AA, Gonder JR, Mao AJ, Hutnik CM. Comparison of the in vitro toxicity of indocyanine green to that of trypan blue in human retinal pigment epithelium cell cultures. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;138(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.02.061.
PMID: 15234283BACKGROUNDYuen D, Gonder J, Proulx A, Liu H, Hutnik C. Comparison of the in vitro safety of intraocular dyes using two retinal cell lines: a focus on brilliant blue G and indocyanine green. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;147(2):251-259.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.031. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
PMID: 18992870BACKGROUNDLim JW, Kim HK, Cho DY. Macular function and ultrastructure of the internal limiting membrane removed during surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;39(1):9-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02377.x.
PMID: 20662848BACKGROUNDLee JW, Kim IT. Outcomes of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: a comparative study. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;54(2):129-34. doi: 10.1007/s10384-009-0778-0. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
PMID: 20401561BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2012
First Posted
February 14, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 22, 2017
Last Updated
September 21, 2018
Record last verified: 2015-12