NCT01532518

Brief Summary

The present pilot study is aimed to obtain preliminary data on the effect of three ascending oral dose levels of nepadutant on the relief of symptoms associated with feeding intolerance. In addition, the assessment of drug exposure (PK assessment) will provide additional information on the dose-effect relationship, thus supporting the dose selection and dosing schedule in the future studies.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2011

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 25, 2012

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 14, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
10.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 6, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

January 25, 2012

Results QC Date

September 3, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 12, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Feeding intoleranceInfanttachykinin antagonistInfant colicNepadutant

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).

    Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for the assessment of effects at V3 (i.e. end of first week of treatment). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

    Baseline (V2) and end of first week of treatment (V3)

  • The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).

    The results obtained at V3 are used as baseline for the second week treatment period (V4). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

    V3 (end of 1st week of treatment) and V4 (end of 2nd week of treatment)

  • The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).

    Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for follow-up assessment 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5) Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

    Baseline (V2) and follow up 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5)

  • I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Baseline (Visit 2) by First Dose Level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg).

    Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs baseline (Visit 2) by first dose level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

    Baseline (V2) and end of 1st week of treatment(V3)

  • I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Visit 3 by Second Dose Level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).

    Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs Visit 3 by second dose level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

    end of first week of treatment (V3) and end of second week of treatment (V4)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Level

    up to 4 weeks

  • A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

    0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

  • A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

    0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

  • A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

    0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

  • A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

    0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

Study Arms (3)

Cohort 3

EXPERIMENTAL

Nepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days

Drug: Nepadutant

Cohort 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days

Drug: Nepadutant

Cohort 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Nepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for additional 7 days

Drug: Nepadutant

Interventions

Nepadutant oral solution

Also known as: MEN 11420
Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 6 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Infants with a clinical diagnosis of feeding intolerance.
  • Age ≤ 6 months at the enrolment.
  • Normal growth.
  • Infants who can refrain from use of erythromycin, metoclopramide, antihistaminic drug, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antacids, antimuscarinic drugs, simethicone and dimethicone from 1 week prior randomization until end of study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any clinically relevant event (excluding those relevant to the condition under study) which has occurred within one week prior to randomization.
  • Any pharmacological treatment starting within one week prior to randomization.
  • Infants for whom a change in the diet (i.e. weaning) has been performed within one week prior to randomization or is planned during the study period.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Arkansas Children's Hospital

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States

Location

Children's Center for Digestive Healthcare

Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States

Location

Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit / University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States

Location

SUNY Downstate Medical Center

Albany, New York, 12207, United States

Location

The University of Toledo College of Medicine\The Toledo Children's Hospital

Toledo, Ohio, 43606, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colic

Interventions

MEN 11420

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Infant, Newborn, DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Limitations and Caveats

Study performed in a small number of subjects.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Angela Capriati
Organization
Menarini Ricerche

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey L Blumer, MD, PhD

    The University of Toledo Medical Center 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo OH 43614 USA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2012

First Posted

February 14, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion

July 1, 2012

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 6, 2023

Results First Posted

May 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2022-08

Locations