Preliminary Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Nepadutant in Infant With Feeding Intolerance
A Multicenter, Open Label, Ascending 7 Day-Repeated Dose Study to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Nepadutant In Infants With Feeding Intolerance
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The present pilot study is aimed to obtain preliminary data on the effect of three ascending oral dose levels of nepadutant on the relief of symptoms associated with feeding intolerance. In addition, the assessment of drug exposure (PK assessment) will provide additional information on the dose-effect relationship, thus supporting the dose selection and dosing schedule in the future studies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Aug 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 6, 2023
CompletedMay 6, 2023
August 1, 2022
11 months
January 25, 2012
September 3, 2015
April 12, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).
Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for the assessment of effects at V3 (i.e. end of first week of treatment). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Baseline (V2) and end of first week of treatment (V3)
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).
The results obtained at V3 are used as baseline for the second week treatment period (V4). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
V3 (end of 1st week of treatment) and V4 (end of 2nd week of treatment)
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).
Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for follow-up assessment 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5) Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Baseline (V2) and follow up 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5)
I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Baseline (Visit 2) by First Dose Level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg).
Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs baseline (Visit 2) by first dose level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Baseline (V2) and end of 1st week of treatment(V3)
I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Visit 3 by Second Dose Level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).
Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs Visit 3 by second dose level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
end of first week of treatment (V3) and end of second week of treatment (V4)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Level
up to 4 weeks
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose
Study Arms (3)
Cohort 3
EXPERIMENTALNepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Cohort 2
EXPERIMENTALNepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Cohort 1
EXPERIMENTALNepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants with a clinical diagnosis of feeding intolerance.
- Age ≤ 6 months at the enrolment.
- Normal growth.
- Infants who can refrain from use of erythromycin, metoclopramide, antihistaminic drug, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antacids, antimuscarinic drugs, simethicone and dimethicone from 1 week prior randomization until end of study.
You may not qualify if:
- Any clinically relevant event (excluding those relevant to the condition under study) which has occurred within one week prior to randomization.
- Any pharmacological treatment starting within one week prior to randomization.
- Infants for whom a change in the diet (i.e. weaning) has been performed within one week prior to randomization or is planned during the study period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Menarini Grouplead
Study Sites (5)
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
Children's Center for Digestive Healthcare
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit / University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12207, United States
The University of Toledo College of Medicine\The Toledo Children's Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43606, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study performed in a small number of subjects.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Angela Capriati
- Organization
- Menarini Ricerche
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey L Blumer, MD, PhD
The University of Toledo Medical Center 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo OH 43614 USA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2012
First Posted
February 14, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 6, 2023
Results First Posted
May 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-08