NCT01529788

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to compare the time to onset of Dysport® versus Botox® in the treatment of lateral orbital rhytids ("crow's feet"). Thirty subjects were enrolled in the study; specifically 30 male or female patients 18 years or older with moderate to severe lateral orbital rhytids at maximum contracture. Each patient were randomized to be treated with Dysport® on one side and Botox® on the other side. Both the injector and patient were blinded to the injected toxin. The efficacy endpoints were determined by investigator and subject live assessment of "crow's feet" at rest and maximum contraction at each visit (every other day for 6 days post-injection, every month for 9 months following) using a validated 5 point photographic scale(no wrinkles \[0\], very fine wrinkles \[1\], fine wrinkles \[2\], moderate wrinkles \[3\] or severe wrinkles \[4\]) used in previous studies. A written description of each photograph was included to help standardize the application of the Photographic Scale.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 8, 2012

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2012

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 30, 2014

Status Verified

September 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

February 8, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 29, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

abobotulinum toxin lateral orbital linesBotoxCosmeticDysportonabotulinum toxinwrinkleslateral orbital lines

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To compare the time to onset of action, efficacy and duration of Dysport® versus Botox® Cosmetic in the treatment of lateral orbital rhytids.

    Subject and investigator assessed grading as well as subject preference

    9 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • To determine the safety and presence of any adverse effects of Dysport® (25 units) versus Botox® Cosmetic (10 units) in the treatment of lateral orbital rhytids.

    9 months

Study Arms (1)

Lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lateral orbital injection of either Botox Cosmetic, 10 units or Dysport, 30 units as a single dose in a randomized (right or left sides) double blind fashion in 90 consecutive subjects

Drug: Right lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or DysportDrug: Left lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport

Interventions

Right lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport (10 units and 30 units, respectively) divided among 4 injection points (0.05 mL \[7.5 units\] per injection point) divided among 4 injection points (0.05mL \[2.5units\]) on Day 0 of the study

Also known as: Botox Cosmetic, Dysport
Lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport

Left lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport (10 units and 30 units, respectively) divided among 4 injection points (0.05 mL \[7.5 units\] per injection point) divided among 4 injection points (0.05mL \[2.5units\]) on Day 0 of the study

Also known as: Botox Cosmetic, Dysport
Lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female patients who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for this study:
  • Eighteen years of age or older.
  • Moderate to severe lateral orbital rhytids at maximum smile (score of \[2\] or \[3\] by physician assessment)
  • Negative pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential.
  • Time and ability to complete the study and comply with instructions.
  • Understanding of the study and contents of the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible for this study:
  • Previous treatment to the glabellar area, forehead or lateral orbital rhytids with Dysport® or Botox® Cosmetic or other botulinum toxin within 180 days of entry into the study. Botulinum toxin treatment of areas other than the lateral orbital rhytids at any time during the study.
  • Patients with an ongoing treatment-related AE from any Dysport® or Botox® Cosmetic or botulinum toxin study.
  • Inability to substantially lessen lateral orbital lines by physically spreading them apart.
  • Permanent or semi-permanent dermal fillers in the lateral orbital rhytids at any time.
  • Ablative skin resurfacing on the lateral orbital rhytids at any time preceding the study or planning to during the current study.
  • Upper eyelid blepharoplasty or brow lift at any time preceding the study or planning to during the current study.
  • Non-ablative treatments in the lateral orbital region for skin dyschromias (e.g. Intense Pulsed Light, light-emitting diodes) at any time during the current study.
  • Non-ablative dermal treatment in the lateral orbital area for skin tightening (e.g. radiofrequency treatments at any time preceding the current study or planned to have this done during the current study.
  • Retinoid, microdermabrasion, or prescription-level glycolic acid treatments to the lateral orbital area within 2 weeks prior to study participation or during the current study.
  • Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with evaluation of the efficacy or safety of the medication.
  • Active infection of the lateral orbital area (e.g. acute acne lesions or ulcers).
  • Pregnant women, nursing mothers, or women who are planning pregnancy during the study, or think they may be pregnant at the start of the study. Throughout the course of the study, women of childbearing potential must use reliable forms of contraception (e.g. abstinence, oral contraceptives for more than 12 consecutive weeks prior to enrollment, or spermicide and condoms).
  • Current history of chronic drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Enrollment in any active study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Maas Clinic

San Francisco, California, 94115, United States

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Elson ML. Evaluation and treatment of the aging face. In: Evaluation and Treatment of the Aging Face. Elson MD, ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995, 1-9.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lowe NJ. Botulinum toxin type A for facial rejuvenation. United States and United Kingdom perspectives. Dermatol Surg. 1998 Nov;24(11):1216-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04100.x.

    PMID: 9834741BACKGROUND
  • Guerrissi J, Sarkissian P. Local injection into mimetic muscles of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of facial lines. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Nov;39(5):447-53. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199711000-00002.

    PMID: 9374139BACKGROUND
  • Foster JA, Barnhorst D, Papay F, Oh PM, Wulc AE. The use of botulinum A toxin to ameliorate facial kinetic frown lines. Ophthalmology. 1996 Apr;103(4):618-22. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30644-1.

    PMID: 8618761BACKGROUND
  • Guyuron B, Huddleston SW. Aesthetic indications for botulinum toxin injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Apr;93(5):913-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199404001-00003.

    PMID: 8134483BACKGROUND
  • Blitzer A, Brin MF, Keen MS, Aviv JE. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of hyperfunctional lines of the face. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Sep;119(9):1018-22. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880210108015.

    PMID: 8357583BACKGROUND
  • Carruthers JD, Carruthers JA. Treatment of glabellar frown lines with C. botulinum-A exotoxin. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992 Jan;18(1):17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03295.x.

    PMID: 1740562BACKGROUND
  • Fagien S. Botox for the treatment of dynamic and hyperkinetic facial lines and furrows: adjunctive use in facial aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Feb;103(2):701-13. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00055.

    PMID: 9950563BACKGROUND
  • Ramirez AL, Reeck J, Maas CS. Botulinum toxin type B (MyoBloc) in the management of hyperkinetic facial lines. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 May;126(5):459-67. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.124706.

    PMID: 12075218BACKGROUND
  • Kim EJ, Ramirez AL, Reeck JB, Maas CS. The role of botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc) in the treatment of hyperkinetic facial lines. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Oct;112(5 Suppl):88S-93S; discussion 94S-97S. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000082197.88799.84.

    PMID: 14504489BACKGROUND
  • Carruthers JA, Lowe NJ, Menter MA, Gibson J, Nordquist M, Mordaunt J, Walker P, Eadie N; BOTOX Glabellar Lines I Study Group. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Jun;46(6):840-9. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.121356.

    PMID: 12063480BACKGROUND
  • Ascher B, Klap P, Marion MH, Chanteloub F. [Botulinum toxin in the treatment of frontoglabellar and periorbital wrinkles. An initial study]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1995 Feb;40(1):67-76. French.

    PMID: 7668808BACKGROUND
  • Ascher B. Facial rejuvenation by non-endoscopic lifting and botulinum toxin injection. Les Cahiers D'Ophthalmologie 2000;45:25-31.

    BACKGROUND
  • Olver JM. Botulinum toxin A treatment of overactive corrugator supercilii in thyroid eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 May;82(5):528-33. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.5.528.

    PMID: 9713061BACKGROUND
  • Erian A, Ionescu NE. Combination treatment of glabellar rhytids. Int J Cosmetic Surg 1999;7(1):14-17.

    BACKGROUND
  • Feller G, Bayerl C, Jung E, Rzany B. Treatment of dynamic facial wrinkles with botulinum toxin type A (Dysport®)-a pilot study. Akt Deramtol 2000;26:65-9.

    BACKGROUND
  • Le Louarn C. [Botulinum toxin and facial wrinkles: a new injection procedure]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1998 Oct;43(5):526-33. French.

    PMID: 9882892BACKGROUND
  • Altman DG. How large a sample? Statistics in Practice. London, UK: British Medical Association 1982.

    BACKGROUND
  • McLarty JW, Levine RJ. How many subjects are required for a study? IRB. 1987 Sep-Oct;9(5):1-3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11649896BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

abobotulinumtoxinABotulinum Toxins, Type A

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Botulinum ToxinsMetalloendopeptidasesEndopeptidasesPeptide HydrolasesHydrolasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesMetalloproteasesBacterial ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsBacterial ToxinsToxins, BiologicalBiological Factors

Study Officials

  • Corey S Maas, MD

    The Maas Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2012

First Posted

February 9, 2012

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion

September 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2014

Last Updated

September 30, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-09

Locations