Onabotulinum Toxin Type A and Abobotulinum Toxin Type A Crow's Feet Rhytid Study
A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Time to Onset, and Duration of Two Botulinum Type A Exotoxins (Onabotulinum Toxin A and Abobotulinum Toxin A) in the Treatment of "Crow's Feet."
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to compare the time to onset of Dysport® versus Botox® in the treatment of lateral orbital rhytids ("crow's feet"). Thirty subjects were enrolled in the study; specifically 30 male or female patients 18 years or older with moderate to severe lateral orbital rhytids at maximum contracture. Each patient were randomized to be treated with Dysport® on one side and Botox® on the other side. Both the injector and patient were blinded to the injected toxin. The efficacy endpoints were determined by investigator and subject live assessment of "crow's feet" at rest and maximum contraction at each visit (every other day for 6 days post-injection, every month for 9 months following) using a validated 5 point photographic scale(no wrinkles \[0\], very fine wrinkles \[1\], fine wrinkles \[2\], moderate wrinkles \[3\] or severe wrinkles \[4\]) used in previous studies. A written description of each photograph was included to help standardize the application of the Photographic Scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 30, 2014
September 1, 2014
3 years
February 8, 2012
September 29, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the time to onset of action, efficacy and duration of Dysport® versus Botox® Cosmetic in the treatment of lateral orbital rhytids.
Subject and investigator assessed grading as well as subject preference
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To determine the safety and presence of any adverse effects of Dysport® (25 units) versus Botox® Cosmetic (10 units) in the treatment of lateral orbital rhytids.
9 months
Study Arms (1)
Lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport
ACTIVE COMPARATORLateral orbital injection of either Botox Cosmetic, 10 units or Dysport, 30 units as a single dose in a randomized (right or left sides) double blind fashion in 90 consecutive subjects
Interventions
Right lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport (10 units and 30 units, respectively) divided among 4 injection points (0.05 mL \[7.5 units\] per injection point) divided among 4 injection points (0.05mL \[2.5units\]) on Day 0 of the study
Left lateral orbital injection of Botox Cosmetic or Dysport (10 units and 30 units, respectively) divided among 4 injection points (0.05 mL \[7.5 units\] per injection point) divided among 4 injection points (0.05mL \[2.5units\]) on Day 0 of the study
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for this study:
- Eighteen years of age or older.
- Moderate to severe lateral orbital rhytids at maximum smile (score of \[2\] or \[3\] by physician assessment)
- Negative pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential.
- Time and ability to complete the study and comply with instructions.
- Understanding of the study and contents of the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible for this study:
- Previous treatment to the glabellar area, forehead or lateral orbital rhytids with Dysport® or Botox® Cosmetic or other botulinum toxin within 180 days of entry into the study. Botulinum toxin treatment of areas other than the lateral orbital rhytids at any time during the study.
- Patients with an ongoing treatment-related AE from any Dysport® or Botox® Cosmetic or botulinum toxin study.
- Inability to substantially lessen lateral orbital lines by physically spreading them apart.
- Permanent or semi-permanent dermal fillers in the lateral orbital rhytids at any time.
- Ablative skin resurfacing on the lateral orbital rhytids at any time preceding the study or planning to during the current study.
- Upper eyelid blepharoplasty or brow lift at any time preceding the study or planning to during the current study.
- Non-ablative treatments in the lateral orbital region for skin dyschromias (e.g. Intense Pulsed Light, light-emitting diodes) at any time during the current study.
- Non-ablative dermal treatment in the lateral orbital area for skin tightening (e.g. radiofrequency treatments at any time preceding the current study or planned to have this done during the current study.
- Retinoid, microdermabrasion, or prescription-level glycolic acid treatments to the lateral orbital area within 2 weeks prior to study participation or during the current study.
- Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with evaluation of the efficacy or safety of the medication.
- Active infection of the lateral orbital area (e.g. acute acne lesions or ulcers).
- Pregnant women, nursing mothers, or women who are planning pregnancy during the study, or think they may be pregnant at the start of the study. Throughout the course of the study, women of childbearing potential must use reliable forms of contraception (e.g. abstinence, oral contraceptives for more than 12 consecutive weeks prior to enrollment, or spermicide and condoms).
- Current history of chronic drug or alcohol abuse.
- Enrollment in any active study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Maas Cliniclead
- Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Maas Clinic
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Related Publications (19)
Elson ML. Evaluation and treatment of the aging face. In: Evaluation and Treatment of the Aging Face. Elson MD, ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995, 1-9.
BACKGROUNDLowe NJ. Botulinum toxin type A for facial rejuvenation. United States and United Kingdom perspectives. Dermatol Surg. 1998 Nov;24(11):1216-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04100.x.
PMID: 9834741BACKGROUNDGuerrissi J, Sarkissian P. Local injection into mimetic muscles of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of facial lines. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Nov;39(5):447-53. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199711000-00002.
PMID: 9374139BACKGROUNDFoster JA, Barnhorst D, Papay F, Oh PM, Wulc AE. The use of botulinum A toxin to ameliorate facial kinetic frown lines. Ophthalmology. 1996 Apr;103(4):618-22. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30644-1.
PMID: 8618761BACKGROUNDGuyuron B, Huddleston SW. Aesthetic indications for botulinum toxin injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Apr;93(5):913-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199404001-00003.
PMID: 8134483BACKGROUNDBlitzer A, Brin MF, Keen MS, Aviv JE. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of hyperfunctional lines of the face. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Sep;119(9):1018-22. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880210108015.
PMID: 8357583BACKGROUNDCarruthers JD, Carruthers JA. Treatment of glabellar frown lines with C. botulinum-A exotoxin. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992 Jan;18(1):17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03295.x.
PMID: 1740562BACKGROUNDFagien S. Botox for the treatment of dynamic and hyperkinetic facial lines and furrows: adjunctive use in facial aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Feb;103(2):701-13. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00055.
PMID: 9950563BACKGROUNDRamirez AL, Reeck J, Maas CS. Botulinum toxin type B (MyoBloc) in the management of hyperkinetic facial lines. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 May;126(5):459-67. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.124706.
PMID: 12075218BACKGROUNDKim EJ, Ramirez AL, Reeck JB, Maas CS. The role of botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc) in the treatment of hyperkinetic facial lines. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Oct;112(5 Suppl):88S-93S; discussion 94S-97S. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000082197.88799.84.
PMID: 14504489BACKGROUNDCarruthers JA, Lowe NJ, Menter MA, Gibson J, Nordquist M, Mordaunt J, Walker P, Eadie N; BOTOX Glabellar Lines I Study Group. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Jun;46(6):840-9. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.121356.
PMID: 12063480BACKGROUNDAscher B, Klap P, Marion MH, Chanteloub F. [Botulinum toxin in the treatment of frontoglabellar and periorbital wrinkles. An initial study]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1995 Feb;40(1):67-76. French.
PMID: 7668808BACKGROUNDAscher B. Facial rejuvenation by non-endoscopic lifting and botulinum toxin injection. Les Cahiers D'Ophthalmologie 2000;45:25-31.
BACKGROUNDOlver JM. Botulinum toxin A treatment of overactive corrugator supercilii in thyroid eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 May;82(5):528-33. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.5.528.
PMID: 9713061BACKGROUNDErian A, Ionescu NE. Combination treatment of glabellar rhytids. Int J Cosmetic Surg 1999;7(1):14-17.
BACKGROUNDFeller G, Bayerl C, Jung E, Rzany B. Treatment of dynamic facial wrinkles with botulinum toxin type A (Dysport®)-a pilot study. Akt Deramtol 2000;26:65-9.
BACKGROUNDLe Louarn C. [Botulinum toxin and facial wrinkles: a new injection procedure]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1998 Oct;43(5):526-33. French.
PMID: 9882892BACKGROUNDAltman DG. How large a sample? Statistics in Practice. London, UK: British Medical Association 1982.
BACKGROUNDMcLarty JW, Levine RJ. How many subjects are required for a study? IRB. 1987 Sep-Oct;9(5):1-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 11649896BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Corey S Maas, MD
The Maas Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2012
First Posted
February 9, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 30, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09