NCT01527214

Brief Summary

Background: The primary investigation of lung cancer (LC) is for 85% of the cases conducted through General Practice, sadly it tends to take a relatively long time from first time the patient is seen by their General Practitioner and until they are diagnosed. LC symptoms are common, but usual because of benign diseases. Only 33% of LC patients presenting with alarm symptoms. On average a General Practitioner in Denmark sees only one patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer a year and the doctor will therefore get the clinical experience that when they refer a patient, test often come out negative and they therefore fail to refer and delay will increase - with a poorer prognosis as a result. Centrally in the diagnosis is conventional chest X-ray, which unfortunately is inefficient in many cases, while CT scanning has proven effective even for small tumors. Hypothesis and aims: The project has three main hypotheses to be tested 1) the GP's use of cancer fast-track and detection of suspected lung cancer can be optimized in relation to interpretation of symptoms and subsequent referral practices and radiological investigation. 2) General Practitioners with special training can change the referral routines and 3) direct access to fast CT scanning leads to earlier diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods: The first part of the study is a register-based study of lung cancer patients' road to diagnosis, based on a database of newly diagnosed cancer patients in a year. Second part of the study is a clinical, randomized study of the effect of referral directly to fast chest CT scan. Primary endpoint is delay, secondary endpoints are referral pattern (use of fast-track packet), primary use of CT and 1-year mortality. Furthermore side effects, including patient groups with increased delay. The study will contribute new knowledge to the way GP's interpret symptoms, the way they refer their patients when they suspect cancer, their use of diagnostic imaging and cancer fast-track pathways. It will then provide a unique opportunity to create the necessary knowledge about the effects of direct referral to fast CT scan and it might be a decision aid whether to open for direct CT scan in General Practice for a group of patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
650

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable lung-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 20, 2012

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2012

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2013

Status Verified

August 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

January 20, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Lung cancerearly detectionCT scanGeneral PracticeEffect of Computed Tomography scansClinical medical education

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Delay

    Time from first presentation i General Practice to the patient obtains the diagnosis

    12 month

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Referral pattern (use of fast-track packet)

    12 month

  • Primary use of CT

    12 month

  • 1-year mortality.

    24 month

Study Arms (2)

CT scan and education

EXPERIMENTAL

All general practices referring to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital.Randomized 1:1. In the intervention group, GPs continue to refer to the lung cancer fast track when indicated. In addition, they are allowed to refer directly to a rapid chest CT scan in cases where they find reasons to examine the patient for lung diseases without having sufficient suspicion of lung cancer to refer the patient to the lung cancer fast track. The GPs will be offered special training related to the diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice before the new referral option is introduced. This will be done by offering training sessions and written material.

Radiation: CT scan and education

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Cluster eligibility: all practices referring to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital. Randomized 1:1. Control arm continues with the usual referral pattern

Interventions

GPs get direct access to chest CT scans for their patients. The GPs will be offered special training related to the diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice.This will be done by offering training sessions and written material. The training will include risk groups, alarm symptoms, symptom complexes and interpretation of CT scan descriptions.

CT scan and education

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • all practices referring to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital.

You may not qualify if:

  • former lung cancer patients.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Aarhus

Aarhus, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Guldbrandt LM, Fenger-Gron M, Rasmussen TR, Rasmussen F, Meldgaard P, Vedsted P. The effect of direct access to CT scan in early lung cancer detection: an unblinded, cluster-randomised trial. BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 25;15:934. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1941-2.

  • Guldbrandt LM, Rasmussen TR, Rasmussen F, Vedsted P. Implementing direct access to low-dose computed tomography in general practice--method, adaption and outcome. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112162. eCollection 2014.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Interventions

Educational Status

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Socioeconomic FactorsPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Peter Vedsted, Professor

    The Research Unit for Generel Practice

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2012

First Posted

February 6, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

July 1, 2013

Study Completion

July 1, 2013

Last Updated

August 7, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-08

Locations