The Effect of Direct Referral for Fast CT Scan in Early Lung Cancer Detection in General Practice
1 other identifier
interventional
650
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: The primary investigation of lung cancer (LC) is for 85% of the cases conducted through General Practice, sadly it tends to take a relatively long time from first time the patient is seen by their General Practitioner and until they are diagnosed. LC symptoms are common, but usual because of benign diseases. Only 33% of LC patients presenting with alarm symptoms. On average a General Practitioner in Denmark sees only one patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer a year and the doctor will therefore get the clinical experience that when they refer a patient, test often come out negative and they therefore fail to refer and delay will increase - with a poorer prognosis as a result. Centrally in the diagnosis is conventional chest X-ray, which unfortunately is inefficient in many cases, while CT scanning has proven effective even for small tumors. Hypothesis and aims: The project has three main hypotheses to be tested 1) the GP's use of cancer fast-track and detection of suspected lung cancer can be optimized in relation to interpretation of symptoms and subsequent referral practices and radiological investigation. 2) General Practitioners with special training can change the referral routines and 3) direct access to fast CT scanning leads to earlier diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods: The first part of the study is a register-based study of lung cancer patients' road to diagnosis, based on a database of newly diagnosed cancer patients in a year. Second part of the study is a clinical, randomized study of the effect of referral directly to fast chest CT scan. Primary endpoint is delay, secondary endpoints are referral pattern (use of fast-track packet), primary use of CT and 1-year mortality. Furthermore side effects, including patient groups with increased delay. The study will contribute new knowledge to the way GP's interpret symptoms, the way they refer their patients when they suspect cancer, their use of diagnostic imaging and cancer fast-track pathways. It will then provide a unique opportunity to create the necessary knowledge about the effects of direct referral to fast CT scan and it might be a decision aid whether to open for direct CT scan in General Practice for a group of patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Nov 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedAugust 7, 2013
August 1, 2013
1.7 years
January 20, 2012
August 5, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Delay
Time from first presentation i General Practice to the patient obtains the diagnosis
12 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Referral pattern (use of fast-track packet)
12 month
Primary use of CT
12 month
1-year mortality.
24 month
Study Arms (2)
CT scan and education
EXPERIMENTALAll general practices referring to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital.Randomized 1:1. In the intervention group, GPs continue to refer to the lung cancer fast track when indicated. In addition, they are allowed to refer directly to a rapid chest CT scan in cases where they find reasons to examine the patient for lung diseases without having sufficient suspicion of lung cancer to refer the patient to the lung cancer fast track. The GPs will be offered special training related to the diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice before the new referral option is introduced. This will be done by offering training sessions and written material.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONCluster eligibility: all practices referring to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital. Randomized 1:1. Control arm continues with the usual referral pattern
Interventions
GPs get direct access to chest CT scans for their patients. The GPs will be offered special training related to the diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice.This will be done by offering training sessions and written material. The training will include risk groups, alarm symptoms, symptom complexes and interpretation of CT scan descriptions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all practices referring to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital.
You may not qualify if:
- former lung cancer patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Aarhus
Aarhus, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Guldbrandt LM, Fenger-Gron M, Rasmussen TR, Rasmussen F, Meldgaard P, Vedsted P. The effect of direct access to CT scan in early lung cancer detection: an unblinded, cluster-randomised trial. BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 25;15:934. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1941-2.
PMID: 26608727DERIVEDGuldbrandt LM, Rasmussen TR, Rasmussen F, Vedsted P. Implementing direct access to low-dose computed tomography in general practice--method, adaption and outcome. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112162. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25383780DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Vedsted, Professor
The Research Unit for Generel Practice
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2012
First Posted
February 6, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 7, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08