Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin D and Repletion Strategies
CEDARS
A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of High-quality Vitamin D3 Nutritional Supplements to Replete Serum Vitamin D
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The importance of vitamin D (VitD) in the prevention and treatment of human health conditions has gained increased attention in recent years. As a result, medical providers of all categories are screening clinical VitD status frequently, yet become challenged with how to best advise patients regarding repletion of VitD status, i.e. which form of VitD replacement is most effective. It has been recognized that to achieve significant effects - serum concentrations \>30ng/ml (75 nmol/ml) - it is necessary, as well as safe, to recommend substantially higher doses than were previously thought sufficient. These higher doses can be easily achieved orally. This clinical trial aims to compare absorption of three available forms of this fat-soluble vitamin, due to the potential differences in absorption of different preparations. High-quality powdered, chewable and lipid-emulsified VitD are readily available as supplements, yet these have not been systematically compared. This three-arm, randomized clinical trial will compare the difference in serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OH)D concentration between the three arms at baseline and after random administration of one of the three VitD preparations for 12-weeks at a dosage of 10,000 IU VitD per day. The investigators hypothesize that the three forms of vitD will result in an equivalent increase in serum 25OHD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2010
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2012
CompletedFebruary 2, 2012
January 1, 2012
1.1 years
November 8, 2011
January 31, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in mean serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration
To compare the change in serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OHD) concentration between three forms of supplemental vitamin D3: a lipid-emulsified form administered in a sesame oil base, a non-emulsified chewable tablet, and a non-emulsified form administered as a capsule, following 12 weeks of supplementation (10,000 IU/day) in D3 insufficient patients (baseline 25-OHD \<33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml)) patients.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of participants reaching 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration >=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml) between groups
12 weeks
Change in mean Klotho protein concentration
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in Toll-like receptor concentration in monocytes
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in mean cardiometabolic risk factors
Baseline- 12 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Powder D3 Capsule - 2,000 IU per Cap
ACTIVE COMPARATORVital Nutrients
Chewable D3 Tablet - 2,000 IU per Tab
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntegrative Therapeutics Inc.
Liquid D3 Drop - 2,000 IU per Drop
ACTIVE COMPARATORBiotics Research
Interventions
10,000 IU per Day for 12 Weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provision of informed consent
- Between18-65 years of age; there is an age-related decline in the absorption, transport or liver hydroxylation of orally-consumed VitD (Harris, 1999) therefore adults older than 65 will be excluded. This population is also at greater risk of being on medications with potential medication interactions, e.g. anticoagulants.
- Willingness to perform baseline screening tests: serum 25-OHD, CBC, Comprehensive metabolic chemistry panel (electrolytes, hepatic and renal function tests, lipids, HgA1C, insulin and glucose)
- Screening serum 25-OHD \<33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml). If \>=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml), subjects will participate in the research study as baseline controls for the nested studies of Klotho and TLR-4.
- Ability to read and speak English
- Willingness to be randomized to one of three active treatments for 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have a serum baseline 25-OHD \>=33ng/ml (82.5 nmol/ml) will be excluded once the VitD sufficient baseline control recruitment goal is met
- Subjects who have historical or current use of extra-dietary VitD, other than what is in a multivitamin, for the previous 3 months.
- LFTs: AST\>60 U/L; ALT\>65 U/L; Alkaline phosphatase \>120 U/L. Total bilirubin\>1.5 mg/dL
- Serum creatinine\>1.4 mg/dL; BUN \>25 mg/dL5. Subjects who are pregnant, or could become pregnant, unless they are using regular birth control (OCPs, condoms, IUD).
- Subjects who have established osteoporosis.
- Subjects who have history or symptoms of a parathyroid disorder.
- Subjects who have difficulty swallowing pills.
- Subjects who are unwilling to use sunscreen.
- Subjects who have had a past adverse reaction to sunscreen.
- Subjects who are taking medications over the previous 3 months that interfere with the metabolism of VitD (anti-convulsants, anti-coagulants, oral corticosteroids, or barbiturates).
- Subjects with any psychological conditions or substance abuse that may make the subject non- adherent, such as history of bipolar disorder, mania, untreated anxiety or other mood disorder, as determined by the site PI.
- Other severe illness or mental incapacity that, in the opinion of the site PI, would render the potential subject incapable of participating in the study.
- Allergy to sesame oil base
- Heart arrhythmia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Lokahi Health Center
Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, 96740, United States
Bastyr University
Kenmore, Washington, 98028, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ryan Bradley, ND, MPH
Bastyr University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2011
First Posted
February 2, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
November 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 2, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-01