Cytoreduction and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Versus Systemic Chemotherapy in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
A Randomised Phase-III Study Comparing Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Versus Modern Systemic Chemotherapy in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see if there is a difference in survival between two different treatment strategies for colorectal peritoneal surface disease. The control arm administered the currently considered standard treatment which is palliative systemic chemotherapy. The experimental arm received the combination treatment cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The investigators hypothesis is that the combination treatment will improve the overall survival.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2003
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2012
CompletedFebruary 1, 2012
January 1, 2012
7.5 years
January 18, 2012
January 31, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
8 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
progression free survival
8 years
Time to secondary treatment
8 years
Radical resectability
5 years
Quality of life
7 years
Health costs
8 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A: CRS plus postop intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
EXPERIMENTALCytoreductive surgery and postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Arm B: Systemic chemotherapy alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORSystemic chemotherapy alone
Interventions
Oxaliplatin 100 mg/ m2 as a 2 h iv infusion + 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/ m2 iv bolus + Isovorin 100 mg/ m2 as a 2 h infusion followed by 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/ m2 as a 46 h infusion. Each cycle is given every other week until 12 cycles have been administered.
Cytoreductive surgery has the goal of completely resecting all visible tumor tissue in the abdomen. Sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has the purpose of an adjuvant treatment to eradicate microscopic residual tumor and prevent recurrences in the abdomen. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil 550 mg/ m2 and intravenous isovorin 30 mg/ m2 day 1-6 med cycles every 4-6 weeks. Six cycles were planned.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Metastatic disease to the peritoneum from colon or rectum (at least two isolated sites of disease)
- verified primary tumor of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum
- Potential resectability as judged by the treating surgeon
- Patient is available for follow-up according to the study protocol
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Extraabdominal metastases or liver metastases
- Paraaortic or other inoperable lymph node metastases
- Clear indication for surgery only (such as obstruction, bleeding or peritonitis)
- Prior treatment of either arm in the study
- Clinical or histopathological diagnosis of Peritoneal Pseudomyxoma
- Age \> 80
- Contraindications for chemotherapy
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Ongoing infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akademiska Sjukhuset (Uppsala University Hospital)
Uppsala, SE-751 85, Sweden
Related Publications (7)
Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E, van Sloothen GW, van Tinteren H, Boot H, Zoetmulder FA. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3737-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.187.
PMID: 14551293BACKGROUNDAssersohn L, Norman A, Cunningham D, Benepal T, Ross PJ, Oates J. Influence of metastatic site as an additional predictor for response and outcome in advanced colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1999 Apr;79(11-12):1800-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690287.
PMID: 10206296BACKGROUNDShepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB. The prognostic importance of peritoneal involvement in colonic cancer: a prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology. 1997 Apr;112(4):1096-102. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70119-7.
PMID: 9097991BACKGROUNDGraf W, Glimelius B, Pahlman L, Bergstrom R. Determinants of prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(9):1119-23. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90307-y.
PMID: 1835620BACKGROUNDElias D, Blot F, El Otmany A, Antoun S, Lasser P, Boige V, Rougier P, Ducreux M. Curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer by complete resection and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer. 2001 Jul 1;92(1):71-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:13.0.co;2-9.
PMID: 11443611BACKGROUNDSaltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, Maroun JA, Ackland SP, Locker PK, Pirotta N, Elfring GL, Miller LL. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343(13):905-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009283431302.
PMID: 11006366BACKGROUNDCashin PH, Mahteme H, Spang N, Syk I, Frodin JE, Torkzad M, Glimelius B, Graf W. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.017. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
PMID: 26751236DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wilhelm Graf, M.D. Ph.D
Uppsala University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., PhD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2012
First Posted
February 1, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2003
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
February 1, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-01