Pilot Study to Determine Percent Tissue Perfusion and Cellular Viability Using SPY Imaging
Pilot Study for: Eye vs. Spy - A Prospective, Randomized Study Evaluating Patient Outcomes With the Use of SPY Imaging During Amputations or Debridements
2 other identifiers
interventional
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Little is known about chronic wound microenvironments, especially in peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and diabetic patients. At the demarcation line, the percentage of viable cells and tissue is unclear. A means to determine cell viability, particularly discerning an apoptotic or necrotic cell pathway would indicate where the line of demarcation should be drawn. The information generated would better predict clinical outcome using SPY Imaging. Cellular studies are needed to successfully confirm a clear line of demarcation to eliminate surgeon subjectivity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 11, 2020
March 1, 2020
6.7 years
January 27, 2012
March 9, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Determination of percent cellular viability
Determine percent cellular viability (vs. apoptotic/dead) of cells at demarcation line
6 weeks
Rate of infection, dehiscence and re-amputation
Rate of infection, dehiscence and re-amputation in patients undergoing SPY imaging
20 weeks
Number of debridements, revisional surgeries and days of stay in hospital
The endpoint for evaluation will be the number of revisional surgeries and number of days of stay in hospital within 20 weeks of the first procedure.
20 weeks
Study Arms (4)
SPY Imaging
EXPERIMENTALSPY Imaging Prior to Amputation or Debridements (50 participants)
No SPY Imaging
NO INTERVENTIONAmputation or Debridements as Standard of Care (50 participants)
Validation Against Angiogram
EXPERIMENTALPatients who are scheduled to undergo an angiogram will also receive ICG angiography (SPY). This will occur at specific time points: 1.) before the angiogram/intervention is performed 2.) immediately after the angiogram/intervention is performed 3.) 5-7 days after angiogram/intervention 4.) 21-30 days after angiogram/intervention. (30 participants)
Establishing Normal Values
EXPERIMENTALTo establish baseline lower extremity perfusion in non-PVD patients. Patients requiring an angiogram for other vascular processes unrelated to the lower extremity will be recruited into this study. ICG angiography (SPY) of the lower extremity will be performed at the time of the angiogram. (30 Participants)
Interventions
Intravenous(1X) in conjunction with SPY Imaging (1 arm)
SPY Imaging to assess tissue perfusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is at least 18 years or older.
- Subject has PVD demonstrated by angiogram.
- Subject is undergoing the first amputation/debridement after vascular intervention, if intervention is/was warranted.
- Subject has had a vascular consult and/or intervention.
- Subject must sign an IRB approved informed consent.
- Subject is willing and able to complete required follow up.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has no evidence of PVD
- Subject's wound presents with a malignancy in the wound bed.
- Subject has liver disease (Previously diagnosed with liver disease or elevated AST, ALT, Alk Phos, or Bilirubin labs within 30 days of procedure).
- Subject has a disorder or situation that the investigator believes will interfere with study compliance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Georgetown University Medical Center; Center for Wound Healing
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher E Attinger, MD
Georgetown University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of the Division of The Center for Wound Healing
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2012
First Posted
January 31, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03